UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) | |
ý |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 |
|
OR |
|
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to |
Commission file number 001-31553
CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE HOLDINGS INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
36-4459170 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
|
30 South Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois (Address of principal executive offices) |
60606 (Zip Code) |
|
(312) 930-1000 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES ý NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES ý NO o
The number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of common stock as of June 30, 2003 was as follows: 6,697,165 shares of Class A common stock, $0.01 par value; 6,243,381 shares of Class A common stock, Class A-1, $0.01 par value; 6,722,418 shares of Class A common stock, Class A-2, $0.01 par value; 6,678,289 shares of Class A common stock, Class A-3, $0.01 par value; 6,426,422 shares of Class A common stock, Class A-4, $0.01 par value; 625 shares of Class B common stock, Class B-1, $0.01 par value; 813 shares of Class B common stock, Class B-2, $0.01 par value; 1,287 shares of Class B common stock, Class B-3, $0.01 par value; and 413 shares of Class B common stock, Class B-4, $0.01 par value.
CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE HOLDINGS INC.
FORM 10-Q
|
|
Page |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: | ||||
Item 1. |
Financial Statements |
3 |
||
Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 |
3 |
|||
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Six Months and Three Months Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 |
4 |
|||
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 |
5 |
|||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 |
6 |
|||
Item 2. |
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
12 |
||
Item 3. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
25 |
||
Item 4. |
Controls and Procedures |
26 |
||
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION: |
||||
Item 4. |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
27 |
||
Item 6. |
Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K |
29 |
||
Signatures |
30 |
2
CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
|
June 30, 2003 |
December 31, 2002 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assets | ||||||||
Current Assets: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 392,835 | $ | 339,260 | ||||
Proceeds from securities lending activities | 1,057,976 | 985,500 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,190 and $1,232 | 69,316 | 50,865 | ||||||
Other current assets | 8,350 | 11,515 | ||||||
Cash performance bonds and security deposits | 1,968,317 | 1,827,991 | ||||||
Total current assets | 3,496,794 | 3,215,131 | ||||||
Property, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization |
107,096 |
109,563 |
||||||
Other assets | 36,360 | 30,322 | ||||||
Total Assets | $ | 3,640,250 | $ | 3,355,016 | ||||
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity |
||||||||
Current Liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 29,173 | $ | 27,607 | ||||
Payable under securities lending agreements | 1,057,976 | 985,500 | ||||||
Other current liabilities | 59,692 | 48,396 | ||||||
Cash performance bonds and security deposits | 1,968,317 | 1,827,991 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 3,115,158 | 2,889,494 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
648 |
2,328 |
||||||
Other liabilities | 19,411 | 17,055 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 3,135,217 | 2,908,877 | ||||||
Shareholders' Equity: | ||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 9,860,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding | | | ||||||
Series A junior participating preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 140,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding | | | ||||||
Class A common stock, $0.01 par value, 138,000,000 shares authorized, 32,708,875 and 32,530,372 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively | 327 | 325 | ||||||
Class B common stock, $0.01 par value, 3,138 shares authorized, issued and outstanding | | | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 187,118 | 179,669 | ||||||
Unearned restricted stock compensation | (1,234 | ) | (665 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings | 318,822 | 266,810 | ||||||
Total shareholders' equity | 505,033 | 446,139 | ||||||
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity | $ | 3,640,250 | $ | 3,355,016 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2003 |
2002 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||||
Revenues | |||||||||||||||
Clearing and transaction fees | $ | 218,207 | $ | 162,159 | $ | 115,808 | $ | 84,274 | |||||||
Quotation data fees | 25,369 | 24,390 | 13,570 | 11,925 | |||||||||||
GLOBEX access fees | 7,605 | 6,408 | 3,883 | 3,278 | |||||||||||
Communication fees | 4,828 | 4,911 | 2,412 | 2,506 | |||||||||||
Investment income | 3,310 | 2,921 | 2,164 | 1,304 | |||||||||||
Securities lending interest income | 4,886 | 9,789 | 2,029 | 6,275 | |||||||||||
Other | 8,690 | 6,571 | 4,429 | 3,518 | |||||||||||
Total Revenues | 272,895 | 217,149 | 144,295 | 113,080 | |||||||||||
Securities lending interest expense | (4,488 | ) | (8,525 | ) | (1,904 | ) | (5,548 | ) | |||||||
Net Revenues | 268,407 | 208,624 | 142,391 | 107,532 | |||||||||||
Expenses | |||||||||||||||
Compensation and benefits | 71,214 | 60,108 | 37,970 | 29,335 | |||||||||||
Occupancy | 12,575 | 11,089 | 6,294 | 5,308 | |||||||||||
Professional fees, outside services and licenses | 14,939 | 15,638 | 7,561 | 8,377 | |||||||||||
Communications and computer and software maintenance | 23,299 | 21,633 | 11,182 | 11,325 | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 26,532 | 23,151 | 13,321 | 12,337 | |||||||||||
Marketing, advertising and public relations | 7,136 | 2,917 | 1,534 | 1,354 | |||||||||||
Other | 9,588 | 8,436 | 5,159 | 5,007 | |||||||||||
Total Expenses | 165,283 | 142,972 | 83,021 | 73,043 | |||||||||||
Income before income taxes | 103,124 | 65,652 | 59,370 | 34,489 | |||||||||||
Income tax provision | (41,990 | ) | (26,002 | ) | (24,357 | ) | (13,498 | ) | |||||||
Net Income | $ | 61,134 | $ | 39,650 | $ | 35,013 | $ | 20,991 | |||||||
Earnings per Common Share: | |||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 1.88 | $ | 1.38 | $ | 1.07 | $ | 0.73 | |||||||
Diluted | 1.81 | 1.33 | 1.03 | 0.71 | |||||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares: | |||||||||||||||
Basic | 32,579,249 | 28,787,562 | 32,624,015 | 28,800,423 | |||||||||||
Diluted | 33,865,296 | 29,706,321 | 33,867,000 | 29,656,429 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
Class A Common Stock |
Class B Common Stock |
Common Stock and Additional Paid-in Capital |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unearned Restricted Stock Compensation |
Retained Earnings |
Accumulated Net Unrealized Securities Gains |
Total Shareholders' Equity |
||||||||||||||||
|
Shares |
Shares |
Amount |
|||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2002 | 32,530,372 | 3,138 | $ | 179,994 | $ | (665 | ) | $ | 266,810 | $ | | $ | 446,139 | |||||||
Net income |
61,134 |
61,134 |
||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options | 157,903 | 3,224 | 3,224 | |||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit related to employee stock options | 2,205 | 2,205 | ||||||||||||||||||
Quarterly cash dividends on common stock of $0.14 per share | (9,122 | ) | (9,122 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Vesting of issued restricted Class A common stock | 20,600 | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | 1,215 | 1,215 | ||||||||||||||||||
Grant of 12,800 shares of restricted Class A common stock | 807 | (807 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization of unearned restricted Class A common stock | 238 | 238 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance June 30, 2003 | 32,708,875 | 3,138 | $ | 187,445 | $ | (1,234 | ) | $ | 318,822 | $ | | $ | 505,033 | |||||||
Balance December 31, 2001 | 28,771,562 | 3,138 | $ | 59,517 | $ | (1,461 | ) | $ | 190,033 | $ | 277 | $ | 248,366 | |||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | 39,650 | 39,650 | ||||||||||||||||||
Change in net unrealized gain on securities, net of tax of $560 | 839 | 839 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income | 40,489 | |||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividend on common stock of $0.60 per share | (17,333 | ) | (17,333 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Vesting of issued restricted Class A common stock | 46,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation | 1,975 | 1,975 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of unearned restricted Class A common stock | 557 | 557 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance June 30, 2002 | 28,817,562 | 3,138 | $ | 61,492 | $ | (904 | ) | $ | 212,350 | $ | 1,116 | $ | 274,054 | |||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2003 |
2002 |
||||||
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 61,134 | $ | 39,650 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 26,532 | 23,151 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation | 1,453 | 2,532 | ||||||
Deferred income tax benefit | (4,791 | ) | (2,839 | ) | ||||
Loss on investment in joint venture | 2,434 | 1,102 | ||||||
Gain on sale of marketable securities | | (167 | ) | |||||
Loss on disposal of fixed assets | 927 | | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts | (42 | ) | 114 | |||||
Increase in accounts receivable | (18,408 | ) | (7,729 | ) | ||||
Decrease (increase) in other current assets | 3,166 | (4,005 | ) | |||||
Increase in other assets | (3,682 | ) | (1,488 | ) | ||||
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable | 1,566 | (5,386 | ) | |||||
Increase in other current liabilities | 17,842 | 633 | ||||||
Increase in other liabilities | 2,356 | 1,332 | ||||||
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities | 90,487 | 46,900 | ||||||
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: | ||||||||
Purchases of property, net | (24,993 | ) | (32,667 | ) | ||||
Capital contributions to joint venture | (3,413 | ) | (3,071 | ) | ||||
Purchases of marketable securities | | (47,666 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities | | 35,836 | ||||||
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities | (28,406 | ) | (47,568 | ) | ||||
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: | ||||||||
Payments on long-term debt | (2,608 | ) | (2,994 | ) | ||||
Cash dividends | (9,122 | ) | (17,333 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from exercised stock options | 3,224 | | ||||||
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities | (8,506 | ) | (20,327 | ) | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 53,577 | (20,995 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 339,260 | 69,101 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 392,835 | $ | 48,106 | ||||
Supplemental Disclosure Of Cash Flow Information: | ||||||||
Interest paid | $ | 222 | $ | 346 | ||||
Income taxes paid | 34,411 | 34,440 | ||||||
Capital leases-asset additions and related obligations | | 558 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared by Chicago Mercantile Exchange Holdings Inc. (CME Holdings) without audit. Certain notes and other information normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted. In the opinion of management, the accompanying consolidated financial statements include all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position of CME Holdings as of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the periods indicated.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements should be read in connection with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in Exhibit 13.1 of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange Holdings Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. Quarterly results are not necessarily indicative of results for any subsequent period.
Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2002 financial statements to conform to the presentation in 2003.
2. PERFORMANCE BONDS AND SECURITY DEPOSITS
Each firm that clears futures and options on futures contracts traded on the exchange is required to deposit and maintain specified performance bonds in the form of cash, U.S. Government securities or bank letters of credit. These performance bonds are available only to meet the financial obligations of that clearing firm to the exchange. Cash performance bonds and security deposits may fluctuate due to the investment choices available to clearing firms and the change in the amount of deposits required. As a result, these assets may vary significantly over time. See Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Exhibit 13.1 to CME Holdings Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.
3. GUARANTEES
Interest Earning Facility. Clearing firms, at their option, may instruct Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (CME) to invest cash on deposit for performance bond purposes in a portfolio of securities that is part of the Interest Earning Facility (IEF) program. The first IEF was organized in 1997 as two limited liability companies. Interest earned, net of expenses, is passed on to participating clearing firms. The principal of the first IEFs totaled $231.9 million at June 30, 2003 and is guaranteed by the exchange as long as clearing firms maintain investment balances in this portfolio. The investment portfolio of these facilities is managed by two of the exchange's approved settlement banks, and eligible investments include U.S. Treasury bills and notes, U.S. Treasury strips and reverse repurchase agreements. The maximum average portfolio maturity is 90 days and the maximum maturity for an individual security is 13 months. If funds invested in the IEF are required to be liquidated due to a clearing firm redemption transaction and funds are not immediately available due to lack of liquidity in the investment portfolio, default of a repurchase counterparty, or loss in market value, CME guarantees the amount of the requirement. FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 45, "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements of Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others," requires that an entity (CME) issuing a guarantee recognize, at the inception of the guarantee, a liability equal to the fair value of the guarantee. CME has evaluated its requirements under FIN No. 45 and concluded that no significant liability is required to be recorded.
7
Intellectual Property Indemnifications. Some agreements with customers accessing GLOBEX® and utilizing our market data services and SPAN® software contain indemnifications from intellectual property claims that may be made against them as a result of their use of these products. The potential future claims relating to these indemnifications cannot be estimated and, therefore, in accordance with FIN No. 45, no liability has been recorded.
4. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation (FIN) No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest EntitiesAn Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 51." FIN No. 46 requires the primary beneficiary to consolidate a variable interest entity (VIE) if it has a variable interest that will absorb a majority of the entity's expected losses if they occur, receive a majority of the entity's expected residual returns if they occur, or both. FIN No. 46 applies immediately to VIE's created after January 31, 2003 and is required to be adopted for periods after June 30, 2003. CME expects to adopt FIN No. 46 beginning with the reporting period ending September 30, 2003. The first IEFs as described above have been determined to be a VIE subject to consolidation (Note 3). If consolidation occurred at June 30, 2003, the effect would be to increase assets and liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet by $231.9 million, the balance in the first IEFs at that date. Such consolidation would have no significant impact on net revenues and would have no effect on net income.
CME also holds a variable interest in OneChicago, LLC, our 40% owned joint venture with the Chicago Board Options Exchange. The company has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of the VIE and therefore does not meet the consolidation requirements under FIN No. 46.
5. LEGAL MATTERS
In November 2002, a former employee filed a complaint in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, which was subsequently amended to allege common law claims of retaliatory discharge and racial discrimination. He is seeking damages in excess of $3 million. In June 2003, the employee filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois alleging that his employment was terminated because of his race in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and that his termination violated Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, as amended. The employee is seeking reinstatement, back pay and benefits, punitive damages in the amount of $200,000, plus actual damages. CME has removed the state court action to federal court based on exclusive federal jurisdiction and to join the case with the federal court action, and the employee has filed a motion to remand the state court action. Based on its investigation to date and advice from legal counsel, management believes these claims are without merit and will defend them vigorously.
6. CAPITAL STOCK
On June 24, 2003, CME Holdings completed a secondary public offering of its Class A common stock. All 1,220,635 shares sold in the offering were sold by selling shareholders and included 75,981 shares of Class A common stock subject to stock options. The shares of Class A common stock were sold at a price to the public of $69.60 per share. CME Holdings did not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling shareholders and incurred $0.7 million in expenses in connection with the offering.
Shares Outstanding. As of June 30, 2003, 6,684,365 shares of Class A common stock, 6,231,881 shares of Class A-1 common stock, 6,710,918 shares of Class A-2 common stock, 6,666,789 shares of
8
Class A-3 common stock, 6,414,922 shares of Class A-4 common stock, 625 shares of Class B-1 common stock, 813 shares of Class B-2 common stock, 1,287 shares of Class B-3 common stock and 413 shares of Class B-4 common stock were issued and outstanding. This does not include 58,800 shares of Class A common stock subject to restricted stock awards, which are not vested. CME Holdings has no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding.
Transfer Restrictions.
Class A Common Stock. Each class of CME Holdings Class A common stock is identical, except that the shares of Class A-1, A-2, A-3 and A-4 common stock are subject to transfer restrictions contained in CME Holdings' Certificate of Incorporation. The number of shares outstanding at June 30, 2003 and the timing of the expiration of the transfer restrictions are set forth below. Until these transfer restrictions lapse, shares of Class A-1, A-2, A-3 and A-4 common stock may not be sold or transferred separately from a share of Class B common stock, subject to limited exceptions specified in CME Holdings' Certificate of Incorporation. There are no restrictions on the shares of Class A common stock sold in the secondary public offering. Pursuant to CME Holdings' Certificate of Incorporation, as a result of the secondary offering, transfer restrictions on the Class A-1 shares that were not sold in the secondary offering will remain in effect until June 4, 2004.
|
Shares Outstanding |
Transfer Restrictions Expire |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Class A | 6,684,365 | Not restricted | |||
Class A-1 | 6,231,881 | June 4, 2004 | |||
Class A-2 | 6,710,918 | December 7, 2003 | |||
Class A-3 | 6,666,789 | June 4, 2004 | |||
Class A-4 | 6,414,922 | June 4, 2004 | |||
Total Class A Shares Outstanding | 32,708,875 | ||||
7. STOCK OPTIONS
In June 2003, CME granted additional stock options to various employees under the Omnibus Stock Plan. The options vest over a five-year period, with 20% vesting one year after the grant date and on that same date in each of the following four years. The options have a 10-year term with an exercise price of $63.01, the market price at the grant date. In accordance with FAS 123, the fair value of the options granted to employees was $8.3 million, measured at the grant date using the Black-Scholes method of valuation. A risk-free rate of 2.52% was used over a period of six years with a 29.2% volatility factor and a 1.3% dividend yield. This compensation expense will be recognized over the vesting period. In June 2003, CME also granted 12,800 shares of restricted stock that have the same vesting provisions as the stock options granted at that time. Compensation expense of $0.8 million relating to restricted stock will be recognized over the vesting period.
9
The following table summarizes stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2003:
|
Number of Shares |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Class A |
Class B |
|||
Balance at December 31, 2002 | 2,522,978 | 156 | |||
Granted | 465,900 | ||||
Exercised | (127,724 | ) | (5 | ) | |
Cancelled | (10,300 | ) | |||
Balance at June 30, 2003 | 2,850,854 | 151 | |||
In April 2003, the CEO exercised 6.86% of the Tranche A portion of his stock option. Under the provisions of the CEO's employment agreement, CME is allowed to provide Class A shares for the value of the Class B portion of the option. As a result, the option was satisfied through the issuance of 79,522 Class A shares, of which 49,343 were issued from the Omnibus Stock Plan. The remaining shares were issued to satisfy the Class B portion of the option and represented authorized and unissued shares of the company registered pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-8.
Total stock options and the portion that can be exercised at June 30, 2003 are as follows:
|
|
Total Options Outstanding |
Exercisable Shares |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEO Option: | |||||||
Tranche A: | Class A Shares Class B Shares |
669,946 73 |
535,957 58 |
||||
Tranche B: | Class A Shares Class B Shares |
719,289 78 |
575,431 62 |
||||
Employee Options: | |||||||
Class A Shares | 1,461,619 | 585,431 | |||||
Total Stock Options | 2,851,005 | 1,696,939 | |||||
8. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of all classes of common stock outstanding for each reporting period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the increase in shares using the treasury stock method to reflect the impact of an equivalent number of shares of common stock if stock options and restricted stock awards were exercised or converted into common stock. The dilutive effect of the option granted to the CEO is calculated as if the entire
10
option, including the Class A share and Class B share portions of the option, would be satisfied through the issuance of Class A shares.
|
Six Months Ended June 30 |
Three Months Ended June 30 |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2003 |
2002 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
|
(in thousands, except share and per share data) |
||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 61,134 | $ | 39,650 | $ | 35,013 | $ | 20,991 | |||||
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares: |
|||||||||||||
Basic | 32,579,249 | 28,787,562 | 32,624,015 | 28,800,423 | |||||||||
Effect of stock options | 1,251,715 | 883,246 | 1,216,749 | 837,724 | |||||||||
Effect of restricted stock grants | 34,332 | 35,513 | 26,236 | 18,272 | |||||||||
Diluted | 33,865,296 | 29,706,321 | 33,867,000 | 29,656,429 | |||||||||
Earnings per Share: |
|||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 1.88 | $ | 1.38 | $ | 1.07 | $ | 0.73 | |||||
Diluted | 1.81 | 1.33 | 1.03 | 0.71 |
11
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2002
Overview
Our operations for the six months ended June 30, 2003 resulted in net income of $61.1 million compared to net income of $39.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002. The increase in net income resulted primarily from a 28.7% increase in net revenues that was only partially offset by a 15.6% increase in operating expenses. The increase in net revenues was driven by a 34.6% increase in revenue from clearing and transaction fees that resulted from a 21.5% increase in total trading volume during the first six months of 2003 when compared to the first six months of 2002. This increase in clearing and transaction fees exceeded the percentage increase in trading volume primarily as a result of the increase in trades executed through our GLOBEX® electronic trading platform, which resulted in a higher average rate per trade, and a shift in the mix of products traded. Increases in compensation and benefits as well as the $5.1 million of expenses related to our brand advertising campaign in the first quarter of 2003 and greater depreciation expense were the primary contributors to the increase in total operating expenses.
Trading volume for the six months ended June 30, 2003 totaled 315.0 million contracts, representing an average daily trading volume of 2.5 million contracts. This was a 21.5% increase over the 259.2 million contracts traded during the same period in 2002, representing an average daily trading volume of 2.1 million contracts. Many volume trading records were established in the first six months of 2003. Daily volume for the month of June 2003 averaged 3.0 million contracts per day, the highest in CME history, and the average daily volume in March 2003 averaged 2.8 million contracts per day, the second highest in CME history. In addition, on March 17, 2003, 1.7 million contracts were traded on GLOBEX, the highest GLOBEX volume day on record, when excluding TRAKRSSM volume.
Revenues
Total revenues increased $55.8 million, or 25.7%, from $217.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to $272.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. Net revenues increased $59.8 million, or 28.7%, from the first half of 2002 as compared to the same period in 2003. The increase in revenues was attributable primarily to a 21.5% increase in average daily trading volume for the six months ended June 30, 2003 when compared to the six months ended June 30, 2002. In the first six months of 2003, electronic trading volume represented 42.3% of total trading volume, or nearly 1.1 million contracts per day, an 82.3% increase over the same period in 2002. Increased trading volume levels resulted from: continued volatility in currencies and U.S. stocks early in 2003; significant mortgage refinancing activity and the reduction in the Fed funds rate in June 2003 that resulted in increased volume in our interest rate products; geopolitical and economic uncertainty; increased customer demand for the liquidity provided by our markets; and product offerings that allowed customers to manage their risks. The additional clearing and transaction fees resulting from the increase in trading volume were augmented by increased revenue generated from our market data offerings, GLOBEX access fees, investment income, our fees for managing the Interest Earning Facility (IEF) program and trading revenue from GFX, our wholly owned subsidiary that utilizes GLOBEX to trade in foreign exchange and Eurodollar futures contracts. Partially offsetting these increases in revenue were modest declines in securities lending interest income, net of interest expense, and losses incurred on the trade-in of certain technology equipment.
Clearing and Transaction Fees. Clearing and transaction fees, which include clearing fees, GLOBEX electronic trading fees and other volume-related charges increased $56.0 million, or 34.6%, from $162.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to $218.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. A significant portion of the increase was attributable to the 21.5% increase in average
12
daily trading volume. In addition to the increase in trading volume, there was a substantial increase in the percentage of trading volume executed through GLOBEX, our electronic trading platform. In the first six months of 2003, GLOBEX volume represented 42.3% of total trading volume compared to 28.2% during the same period in 2002. Also, the product mix shifted to more equity product volume. For the six months ended June 30, 2003, equity products represented 44.0% of trading volume, compared to 31.8% during the same period of 2002. By contrast, for the six months ended June 30, 2003, interest rates represented 49.5% of our volume, compared to 62.0% during the same period in 2002. Fees for interest rate products are lower than fees for equity products. In the normal course of business, we audit our clearing firms for compliance with our fee policies and assessments are issued for any deficiencies noted. Clearing and transaction fees revenue increased in the first six months of 2003 as the result of clearing firm assessments for clearing and transaction fees resulting from these audits and included one assessment for $2.5 million. In addition, clearing and transaction fees for the first six months of 2002 were reduced by $5.0 million as a result of a reserve established in June 2002 for a one-time payment to clearing firms relating to our fee adjustment policy and clearing firm account management errors. There was no similar reserve in the first six months of 2003.
The average rate, or revenue, per contract increased from $0.626 for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to $0.693 for the same period in 2003. The increase was primarily the result of the increase in percentage of trades executed through GLOBEX, which has a higher average rate per trade, and the product mix shift. In addition, the tiered pricing for Eurodollar products was changed effective March 1, 2003. The thresholds for obtaining the tiered pricing discounts were increased, and the amount of the discount was decreased. As a result, the average rate per contract during the first six months of 2003 reflects a reduction of approximately $0.018 for the effect of tiered pricing compared to a $0.040 reduction in the first six months of 2002. In addition, the clearing firm assessment for clearing and transaction fees of $2.5 million added approximately $0.008 to our average rate per contract for the six months ended June 30, 2003. With respect to the first six months of 2002, the average rate per contract was reduced by approximately $0.016 as a result of the $5.0 million reserve established in June 2002 to allow clearing firms to submit clearing fee adjustments for prior periods. Partially offsetting these factors that resulted in an increase in the average rate per contract in the first six months of 2003 was a decrease in the percentage of trades executed by non-member customers from 23% for the first half of 2002 to 22% for the first half of 2003. We believe our lower fee structure for members has resulted in the acquisition of trading rights by parties intending to trade significant volumes on our exchange, creating an increase in member volume. In addition, an incentive program was implemented effective March 1, 2003 to stimulate volume in the back months of the Eurodollar futures contract, or those contract months that trade three to 10 years into the future. This program reduced our average rate per contract approximately $0.004 or $1.3 million, for the six months ended June 30, 2003. Finally, in July 2002, we began trading a new contract, Long-Short Technology TRAKRS, that was followed by two additional TRAKRS contracts through June 30, 2003. Similar to limits on certain GLOBEX fees, transaction fees for this contract are limited based on the size of the order. The average rate per contract on these trades in the first six months of 2003 was $0.011. As a result, TRAKRS volume had an adverse impact on our overall rate per contract during the six months ended June 30, 2003. If volume and fees for TRAKRS were excluded from the first half of 2003, our average rate per contract would have increased by approximately $0.008 to $0.701.
13
The following table shows the average daily trading volume in our four product areas, the portion that was traded electronically through the GLOBEX platform, and clearing and transaction fee revenues expressed in total dollars and as an average rate per contract:
|
Six Months Ended June 30 |
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product Area |
Percentage Increase/ (Decrease) |
|||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
Interest Rate | 1,257,513 | 1,295,102 | (2.9 | )% | ||||||
Equity | 1,116,995 | 664,073 | 68.2 | |||||||
Foreign Exchange | 131,707 | 99,446 | 32.4 | |||||||
Commodity | 34,332 | 31,810 | 7.9 | |||||||
Total Volume | 2,540,547 | 2,090,431 | 21.5 | |||||||
GLOBEX Volume |
1,075,068 |
589,826 |
82.3 |
|||||||
GLOBEX Volume as a Percent of Total Volume | 42.3 | % | 28.2 | % | ||||||
Clearing and Transaction Fee Revenues (in thousands) | $ | 218,207 | $ | 162,159 | ||||||
Average Rate per Contract | $ | 0.693 | $ | 0.626 |
With the exception of our interest rate products, we experienced an increase in trading volume in each product area in the first six months of 2003 when compared to the same period in 2002. With respect to interest rate products, in 2002, there was uncertainty related to interest rate levels that was not as evident in the first quarter of 2003. The reduction in interest rate product trading volume experienced in the first three months of 2003 was partially offset by increased trading volume in the second quarter of 2003 that resulted from mortgage refinancing activity and the 0.25% reduction in the Fed funds rate announced by the U.S. Federal Reserve Board in June 2003. Our equity product volume was influenced by the volatility in U.S. equity markets that was evident in the first three months of 2003, primarily as a result of economic conditions and geopolitical uncertainty. This volatility, combined with increased distribution to customers through GLOBEX and marketing efforts to increase awareness of our product offerings, drove the growth in volume in our equity products. The growth in foreign exchange volume is primarily due to improvements in our GLOBEX trading system and our central counterparty clearing which makes these products increasingly important to large banks and investment banks. Price levels and volatility patterns that contributed to the increase in volume in our commodity products during the first quarter of 2003 continued through the second quarter of 2003.
Our volume discounts for Eurodollar contracts changed as of March 1, 2003. This change included an increase in the volume levels that must be traded to receive the discount and a decrease in the maximum discount that could be received. Also, effective March 1, 2003, we implemented an incentive plan to promote liquidity in the back months of our Eurodollar futures by offering incentives for high volume traders. The total expense under this incentive plan will not exceed $4.0 million for the 10-month period ending December 31, 2003.
Effective September 2, 2003, we will reduce GLOBEX electronic trading customer fees that are associated with calendar spread "rolls" in our E-mini stock index contracts for customer accounts from $0.50 to $0.10 per side. As a result, the overall customer rate for these roll trades, when executed as a spread, will be reduced from $1.14 to $0.74 per side. A roll occurs when a position in an expiring contract is replaced by a similar position in the new front-month contract.
On that same date we will also reduce GLOBEX electronic trading system fees for Eurodollar contracts and other interest rate products from $0.25 per side to $0.10 per side for CME members, clearing members and their affiliates.
14
Additionally, we will establish a market maker program for Eurodollar futures traded on GLOBEX during non-floor trading hours. The electronic Eurodollar market maker program will be open to CME members, lessees and those who trade proprietary accounts at member firms. In order to participate in the market maker program, individuals or firms will be required to post sizeable bids and offers in designated Eurodollar futures contracts during non-floor trading hours, or between 2:00 p.m. and 7:20 a.m. Central Time Monday through Thursday and Sundays from 5:30 p.m.
A substantial portion of our clearing as well as transaction fees, telecommunications fees and various service charges included in other revenue are billed to the clearing firms of the exchange. The majority of clearing and transaction fees received from clearing firms represent charges for trades executed on behalf of the customers of the various clearing firms. We currently have approximately 70 clearing firms. Should a clearing firm withdraw from the exchange, we believe the customer portion of that firm's trading activity would likely transfer to another clearing firm of the exchange. Therefore, we do not believe we are exposed to significant risk from the loss of revenue received from any particular clearing firm.
Quotation Data Fees. Quotation data fees increased $1.0 million, or 4.0%, from $24.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to $25.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. The increase resulted primarily from the change to our fee structure that was implemented on April 1, 2003. At that time, we changed the fees for our professional service by increasing the fee for additional screens from $12 per month to $20 per month and lowering the fee for first locations from $60 per month to $50 per month. At June 30, 2003, there were approximately 58,000 subscribers to our market data and the data was accessible from approximately 176,000 screens and included approximately 25,000 subscribers to our lower-priced non-professional service. This represented a decrease of approximately 9,000 screens from June 30, 2002 when the total was approximately 185,000 screens. While the number of subscribers has increased from approximately 50,000 subscribers at June 30, 2002, the increase occurred in our lower-priced non-professional E-mini market data service. The change in the number of subscribers, screens and locations from the first half of 2002 to the first half of 2003 is consistent with the trend experienced over the course of 2002, primarily as a result of contraction within the financial services industry.
For the six months ended June 30, 2003, the two largest resellers of our market data represented approximately 50% of our quotation data fees revenue. Should one of these vendors no longer subscribe to our market data, we believe the majority of that firm's customers would likely subscribe to our market data through another reseller. Therefore, we do not believe we are exposed to significant risk from the loss of revenue received from any particular market data reseller.
Effective January 1, 2004, we will modify our market data pricing to a flat fee structure. Users of the professional service will be charged $30 per month for each market data screen, or device. There will no longer be a different charge for the first screen at each location.
GLOBEX Access Fees. GLOBEX access fees increased $1.2 million, or 18.7%, from $6.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to $7.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. This increase resulted primarily from the additional monthly access fees generated by an increased number of GLOBEX users during the first half of 2003, particularly those accessing GLOBEX through our T-1 connection.
In July, 2003 we announced an expanded telecommunications alternative, Client DIRECTLink, for users of GLOBEX, our CLEARING 21® system and market data. This program allows participants to coordinate intercompany connectivity to CME through existing connections to major telecommunications vendors, giving them the option to order CME connections with greater capacity than the existing T-1 line offered through CME. Through this program, customers will now manage their own equipment and network. CME will charge $200 a month per 0.5 megabyte bandwidth, and the telecommunications company selected will charge an access fee that varies by customer. To the
15
extent that existing customers switch to this alternative, we will experience a decrease in revenue as well as in communications expense.
Communication Fees. Communication fees were relatively constant at $4.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and $4.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. The number of individuals and firms utilizing our communications services and the associated rates has not changed significantly from the first six months of 2002 to the first six months of 2003.
Investment Income. Investment income increased $0.4 million, or 13.3%, from $2.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to $3.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. The increase resulted primarily from an increase of approximately $3.1 million in interest income as a result of increased balances in short-term investments of available funds and cash performance bonds and security deposits as well as the investment of the net proceeds of our initial public offering that was completed in December 2002. In addition, there was a $0.9 million increase in the investment results of our non-qualified deferred compensation plan that is included in investment income but does not affect our net income, as there is an equal increase in our compensation and benefits expense. Partially offsetting these increases in investment income was a reduction in rates earned on our marketable securities, short-term investments of available funds and the investment of clearing firms' cash performance bonds and security deposits. In the third quarter of 2002, we changed our investment policy and converted our marketable securities to short-term investments. Therefore, all investments were short-term in nature during the first half of 2003 and consisted of money market mutual funds. The average rate earned on all investments declined from approximately 2.5% in the first six months of 2002 to approximately 1.1% during the same period in 2003, representing a decrease in investment income of approximately $3.5 million.
Securities Lending Interest Income and Expense. Securities lending interest income decreased $4.9 million, or 50.0%, from $9.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to $4.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. The average balance of proceeds from securities lending activity was $956.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and $736.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. Securities lending interest expense decreased $4.0 million, or 47.4%, from $8.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to $4.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. This expense is an integral part of our securities lending program and is required to engage in securities lending transactions. Therefore, this expense is presented in the consolidated statements of income as a reduction of total revenues. The net revenue from securities lending represented a return of 0.26% on the average daily balance in the first half of 2002 compared to 0.11% in the first half of 2003. Beginning in 2003, we elected to make our daily offering of securities available for lending later in the business day. As a result, the number of investment choices and the related returns has decreased from 2002 to 2003.
Other Revenue. Other revenue increased $2.1 million, or 32.3%, from $6.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to $8.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. This increase is attributed primarily to a $2.2 million increase in the trading revenue generated by GFX, a $0.7 million increase in fees associated with managing our IEF program and a $1.3 million increase in revenue for certain communication services provided to OneChicago, the joint venture established for the trading of single stock futures and narrow-based stock indexes. Partially offsetting these increases was a $1.3 million increase in our share of the OneChicago net loss and $0.9 million of losses incurred on certain technology equipment that was traded-in during the first six months of 2003.
Expenses
Total operating expenses increased $22.3 million, or 15.6%, from $143.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to $165.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. This increase was
16
primarily attributable to increases in compensation and benefits as well as the marketing expenses associated with our brand advertising campaign and depreciation and amortization expense.
Compensation and Benefits Expense. Compensation and benefits expense increased $11.1 million, or 18.5%, from $60.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to $71.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. There were four significant components to this increase. The average number of employees increased approximately 8%, or by 89 employees, from the six months ended June 30, 2002 to the six months ended June 30, 2003. This increased headcount resulted in additional compensation and benefits, excluding bonuses, of approximately $4.4 million. We had 1,185 employees at June 30, 2003. Compensation and benefits increased approximately $3.9 million as a result of annual salary increases and related increases in employer taxes, pension and benefits. Additionally, bonus expense increased $4.1 million from the six months ended June 30, 2002 to the six months ended June 30, 2003. As a result of an annual incentive plan approved in 2003, bonus expense is now directly linked to cash earnings as defined in the plan. Finally, the $0.9 million increase in the earnings of the deferred compensation plan resulted in increased compensation and benefits expense. Partially offsetting these increases was a $1.1 million decrease in stock-based compensation. Although there were additional stock options granted in June 2003, the majority of outstanding stock options were issued in 2000 and 2001. We have elected an accelerated method for recognizing this expense and as a result, a greater percentage of the total expense for all stock awards is recognized in the first years of the vesting period. Therefore, the decline in expense from the first six months of 2002 to the same period in 2003 is a direct result of the time that has lapsed since options were granted and the expense previously recognized in the periods immediately following the date of grant. Finally, there was a $0.7 million decrease in compensation and benefits expense for the six months ended June 30, 2003 as a result of the reimbursement provisions of the CME/Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT®) Common Clearing Link agreement. Under the terms of this agreement, that was finalized in April 2003, CME will begin to provide clearing services to CBOT in November 2003 and we will be reimbursed by CBOT to a maximum of $2.0 million for expenses to prepare for providing this service. There was no similar reimbursement arrangement during the six months ended June 30, 2002.
Occupancy Expense. Occupancy expense increased $1.5 million, or 13.4%, from $11.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to $12.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. Increased operating expenses and insurance costs resulted in $1.0 million of this increase. Rent expense has also increased, as a result of additional space we now lease at our main location.
Professional Fees, Outside Services and Licenses Expense. Professional fees, outside services and licenses decreased $0.7 million, or 4.5%, from $15.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to $14.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. The decrease resulted primarily from a $0.8 million decrease in legal fees, which included a $1.8 million decrease in fees incurred for the patent litigation that was settled in 2002. This decline in legal fees related to litigation was partially offset by additional legal fees as a result of our secondary offering of stock that was completed in June 2003. Additionally, under the terms of our CME/CBOT Common Clearing Link agreement that was signed in April 2003, our professional fees expense in the first six months of 2003 has been reduced by $0.4 million for amounts that will be reimbursed by CBOT. No similar reimbursement existed during 2002. Partially offsetting these decreases was a $0.9 million increase in license fees relating to increased trading volume in our equity products.
Communications and Computer and Software Maintenance Expense. Communications and computer and software maintenance expense increased $1.7 million, or 7.7%, from $21.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to $23.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. Expenses of this nature are affected primarily by growth in electronic trading. Our computer and software maintenance costs are driven by the number of transactions processed, not the volume of contracts traded. We processed nearly 80% of total transactions electronically in the first half of 2003 compared
17
to approximately 70% in the first half of 2002, which represented approximately 40% and nearly 30%, respectively, of total contracts traded. As a result, our expenses for software and maintaining hardware increased $1.0 million during the first six months of 2003 when compared to the same period in 2002, primarily as a result of the need to expand our capacity for processing transactions. In addition, the communications expense associated with our remote data facility, that became operational in October 2002, increased $0.8 million from the first half of 2002 to the first half of 2003. Communications expense associated with our GLOBEX network was relatively constant from the six months ended June 30, 2002 to the six months ended June 30, 2003 primarily as a result of a $1.5 million refund from our telecommunications provider for billing errors that related to previous periods.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $3.3 million, or 14.6%, from $23.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to $26.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. Capital expenditures totaled $56.9 million in 2002 and $25.0 million in the first six months of 2003. Technology-related purchases represented approximately 90% of total purchases in 2002 and 85% in 2003. Equipment and software represent the greatest portion of these technology-related purchases and are depreciated over a three or four year period. Therefore, these recent purchases, which include the development of software for internal use, have resulted in the increased depreciation and amortization expense from the first half of 2002 to the first half of 2003.
Marketing, Advertising and Public Relations Expense. Marketing, advertising and public relations expense increased $4.2 million, from $2.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to $7.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. In the first quarter of 2003 we incurred $5.1 million of expense associated with our brand advertising campaign. There was no similar expense in the first half of 2002. We anticipate that this initiative to increase our brand awareness will result in a total expense of approximately $6 million for the year 2003. Partially offsetting the increased brand advertising expense during the first quarter of 2003 was a reduction in product advertising when compared to the same period in 2002.
Other Expense. Other expense increased $1.2 million, or 13.7%, from $8.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 to $9.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. The primary factor in this increase was a $1.0 million increase in our insurance expense, which includes directors and officers and general liability coverage. In addition, fees to our Board of Directors increased in the first six months of 2003 as a result of changes in the fee structure that were effective in the fourth quarter of 2002. We also experienced increases in general administrative costs from the first half of 2002 to the first half of 2003.
Income Tax Provision
We recorded an income tax provision of $42.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 compared to $26.0 million for the same period in 2002. The effective tax rate was 40.7% for the first six months of 2003, compared to 39.6% for the first six months of 2002. The increase in the effective rate resulted primarily from certain expenses related to our secondary offering, completed in June 2003, that are not deductible for purposes of determining taxable income.
Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2003 Compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2002
Overview
Our operations for the three months ended June 30, 2003 resulted in net income of $35.0 million compared to net income of $21.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002. The increase in
18
net income resulted primarily from a 32.4% increase in net revenues that was only partially offset by a 13.7% increase in operating expenses. The increase in net revenues was driven by a 21.6% increase in total trading volume during the second quarter of 2003 when compared to the second quarter of 2002. The percentage increase in net revenues exceeded the increase in trading volume primarily as a result of the increase in the percentage of trades executed through GLOBEX which consist primarily of equity products with a higher average rate per trade. In addition, revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2002 was reduced by the $5.0 million reserve established for payments to clearing firms for fee adjustments. There was no similar reserve in 2003. Increases in expenses resulted primarily from greater compensation and benefits expense.
Trading volume for the three months ended June 30, 2003 totaled 168.6 million contracts, representing an average daily trading volume of 2.7 million contracts. This was a 21.6% increase over the 138.7 million contracts traded during the same period in 2002, representing an average daily trading volume of 2.2 million contracts. The month of June 2003 represented the busiest month in our history, as 63.6 million contracts were traded. June 2003 was the second busiest month in our history for average daily volume in our E-mini equity futures and new volume records were established for interest rate and foreign exchange products.
Revenues
Total revenues increased $31.2 million, or 27.6%, from $113.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 to $144.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003. Net revenues increased $34.9 million, or 32.4%, from the second quarter of 2002 to the same period in 2003. The increase in revenues was attributable primarily to a 23.5% increase in average daily trading volume for the three months ended June 30, 2003 when compared to the three months ended June 30, 2002. In the second quarter of 2003, volume increased in our four main product areas and in our three venues. Electronic trading volume represented 40.6% of total trading volume, or nearly 1.1 million contracts per day, a 63.0% increase over the same period in 2002. In addition to increased clearing and transaction fees resulting from the increase in trading volume, we also experienced increased revenue from quotation data fees, investment income and trading revenue from GFX, our wholly owned subsidiary that utilizes GLOBEX to trade in foreign exchange and Eurodollar futures contracts. These increases were partially offset by a reduction in interest income, net of the applicable interest expense, from our securities lending activity.
Clearing and Transaction Fees. Clearing and transaction fees, which include clearing fees, GLOBEX electronic trading fees and other volume-related charges increased $31.5 million, or 37.4%, from $84.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 to $115.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003. A significant portion of the increase was attributable to the 23.5% increase in average daily trading volume. In addition to the increase in trading volume, there was a significant increase in the percentage of trading volume executed through GLOBEX, our electronic trading platform. In the second quarter of 2003, GLOBEX volume represented 40.6% of total trading volume compared to 30.8% during the same period in 2002. Also, the product mix shifted to more equity product volume and less interest rate volume. For the three months ended June 30, 2003, equity products represented 41.7% of trading volume, compared to 34.0% during the same period of 2002. By contrast, for the three months ended June 30, 2003, interest rates represented 51.9% of our volume, compared to 59.8% during the same period in 2002. Fees for interest rate products are lower than fees for equity products. In addition, clearing and transaction fees revenue for the second quarter of 2003 includes revenue for clearing firm assessments resulting from audits of clearing and transaction fees that are conducted in the normal course of business to assure compliance with our fee policies. Any correction to prior billings is assessed based on the audit and the second quarter of 2003 included an assessment of $2.5 million. Finally, in the second quarter of 2002, we established a one-time reserve of $5.0 million for payments to clearing firms for their account management errors that were not adjusted
19
within our established three-month timeframe for correcting these errors. There was no similar reserve in the second quarter of 2003.
Primarily as a result of the increase in percentage of trades executed through GLOBEX and the product mix shift, the average rate, or revenue, per contract increased from $0.608 for the three months ended June 30, 2002 to $0.687 for the same period in 2003. In addition, the $5.0 million reserve established in the second quarter of 2002 resulted in a $0.036 reduction in the rate per trade for the three months ended June 30, 2002. Without the reserve, the average rate per trade would have been $0.644 for the second quarter of 2002. In the second quarter of 2003, the change to our tiered pricing discounts for Eurodollar products that became effective March 1, 2003 had a favorable impact on the average rate per contract. The thresholds for obtaining the tiered pricing discounts were increased and the amount of the discount was decreased. As a result, the tiered pricing discount reduced our rate per trade by only $0.015 in the second quarter of 2003 compared to a reduction of $0.038 in the second quarter of 2002. The previously mentioned clearing firm assessment for clearing and transaction fees also increased our average rate per contract in the second quarter of 2003 by $0.015. To stimulate volume in the back months of the Eurodollar futures contract, an incentive program was implemented effective March 1, 2003. This program reduced our average rate per contract approximately $0.006 for the three months ended June 30, 2003. Our average rate per contract for the three months ended June 30, 2003 was also affected by the introduction of TRAKRS contracts in July 2002. Similar to limits on certain GLOBEX fees, transaction fees for this contract are limited based on the size of the order. The average rate per contract for these trades in the second quarter of 2003 was $0.011. As a result, TRAKRS volume had an adverse impact on our overall rate per contract. If volume and fees for TRAKRS were excluded from the second quarter 2003, our average rate per contract would have increased by approximately $0.012 to $0.699. In the second quarter of 2002 and 2003, the percentage of trades executed by non-member customers was constant at 22%, reversing a recent trend over the past two years when the percentage of non-member customer trades had been declining.
The following table shows the average daily trading volume in our four product areas, the portion that was traded electronically through the GLOBEX platform, and clearing and transaction fee revenues expressed in total dollars and as an average rate per contract:
|
Three Months Ended June 30 |
|
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product Area |
Percentage Increase/ (Decrease) |
|||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
Interest Rate | 1,389,457 | 1,295,024 | 7.3 | % | ||||||
Equity | 1,115,884 | 737,611 | 51.3 | |||||||
Foreign Exchange | 136,722 | 102,647 | 33.2 | |||||||
Commodity | 33,970 | 31,811 | 6.8 | |||||||
Total Volume | 2,676,033 | 2,167,093 | 23.5 | |||||||
GLOBEX Volume | 1,086,868 | 666,640 | 63.0 | |||||||
GLOBEX Volume as a Percent of Total Volume | 40.6 | % | 30.8 | % | ||||||
Clearing and Transaction Fee Revenues (in thousands) | $ | 115,808 | $ | 84,274 | ||||||
Average Rate per Contract | $ | 0.687 | $ | 0.608 |
Volume in our interest rate products grew each month in the second quarter of 2003, culminating in a new record in June. Interest rate volume has increased as derivatives users focus on credit quality. Additionally, mortgage refinancing activity has continued and the U.S. Federal Reserve Board reduced the Fed funds rate in June 2003. Our equity product volume experienced significant growth from the second quarter of 2002 to the second quarter of 2003. Approximately 88% of our stock index product
20
volume is traded through the GLOBEX platform. Greater access to GLOBEX combined with an increase in the number of software vendors that offer GLOBEX and increased speed of trading have all contributed to the growth in our equity products. Our foreign exchange volume has also benefited from improvements in our GLOBEX trading platform. In the second quarter of 2003, approximately 41% of our foreign exchange volume was conducted through GLOBEX compared to approximately 29% during the same period in 2002. In addition, our central counterparty clearing makes our foreign exchange products increasingly important to large banks and investment banks. Price levels, specifically for cattle, and concerns regarding volatility patterns of commodity prices contributed to the increase in volume in our commodity products during the second quarter of 2003 when compared to the same period in 2002.
Quotation Data Fees. Quotation data fees increased $1.7 million, or 13.8%, from $11.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 to $13.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003. The increased revenue in the second quarter of 2003 resulted primarily from the price change that was effective April 1, 2003.
21
GLOBEX Access Fees. GLOBEX access fees increased $0.6 million, or 18.5%, from $3.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 to $3.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003. This increase resulted primarily from the additional monthly access fees generated by an increased number of GLOBEX users during the second quarter of 2003, particularly those accessing GLOBEX through our T1 connection, that was only partially offset by a decrease in individuals utilizing a dedicated workstation to access GLOBEX.
Communication Fees. Communication fees were relatively unchanged, reflecting a decrease of $0.1 million, or 3.8%, from $2.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 to $2.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003.
Investment Income. Investment income increased $0.9 million, or 66.0%, from $1.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 to $2.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003. The primary component was an increase of approximately $1.6 million in interest income as a result of increased balances in short-term investments of available funds and cash performance bonds and security deposits as well as the investment of the net proceeds of our initial public offering that was completed in December 2002. In addition, there was a $1.2 million increase in investment income related to the improved investment results of our non-qualified deferred compensation plan that is included in investment income but does not affect our net income, as there is an equal increase in our compensation and benefits expense. Partially offsetting these increases was a reduction in rates earned on our marketable securities, short-term investments of available funds and the investment of clearing firms' cash performance bonds and security deposits. In the third quarter of 2002, we changed our investment policy and converted our marketable securities to short-term investments. Therefore, all investments were short-term in nature during the second quarter of 2003 and consist of money market mutual funds. The average rate earned on all investments declined from approximately 2.5% in the second quarter of 2002 to approximately 1.1% during the same period in 2003, representing a decrease in investment income of approximately $1.9 million. In addition, there were gains from sales of some of our marketable securities in the second quarter of 2002. There were no similar sales or related gains in the second quarter of 2003.
Securities Lending Interest Income and Expense. Securities lending interest income decreased $4.3 million, or 67.7%, from $6.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 to $2.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003. The average balance of proceeds from securities lending activity was $1.2 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and $633.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003. Securities lending interest expense decreased $3.6 million, or 65.7%, from $5.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 to $1.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003. This expense is an integral part of our securities lending program and is required to engage in securities lending transactions. Therefore, this expense is presented in the consolidated statements of income as a reduction of total revenues. The net revenue from securities lending represented a return of 0.24% on the average daily balance in the second quarter of 2002 compared to 0.08% in the second quarter of 2003. Interest rates earned have declined more from the second quarter of 2002 to the second quarter of 2003 than the associated rate for interest expense. Beginning in 2003, we elected to make our daily offering of securities available for lending later in the business day. As a result, the number of investment choices and the related returns has decreased from 2002 to 2003.
Other Revenue. Other revenue increased $0.9 million, or 25.9%, from $3.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 to $4.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003. This increase is attributed primarily to a $1.3 million increase in the trading revenue generated by GFX and a $0.2 million increase in fees associated with managing our IEF program. In addition, in the second quarter of 2003, we generated $0.7 million of revenue for providing certain communication and regulatory services to OneChicago. This represented a $0.6 million increase from the second quarter of 2002 when we only provided regulatory services. Partially offsetting these increases was a $0.5 million
22
increase in our share of the OneChicago net loss and $0.9 million of losses incurred as a result of trade-in activity for certain technology-related capital equipment purchases.
Expenses
Total operating expenses increased $10.0 million, or 13.7%, from $73.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 to $83.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003. This increase was attributable primarily to increases in compensation and benefits.
Compensation and Benefits Expense. Compensation and benefits expense increased $8.7 million, or 29.4%, from $29.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 to $38.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003. There were four significant components to this increase. Bonus expense for the second quarter of 2003, as calculated under the recently approved annual incentive plan, increased $4.1 million when compared to the same period in 2002. The average number of employees increased approximately 8%, or by 86 employees, from the second quarter of 2002 to the second quarter of 2003. This increased headcount resulted in additional compensation and benefits, excluding bonuses, of approximately $2.1 million. In addition, compensation and benefits increased approximately $2.2 million as a result of annual salary increases and related increases in employer taxes, pension and benefits. Our stock-based compensation expense decreased $0.2 million. In June 2003, we granted additional employee stock options. The total expense related to this option grant of 465,900 shares is $8.3 million and will be recognized over the five-year vesting period. We have elected an accelerated method for recognizing the expense associated with our stock awards. Therefore, a greater percentage of the total expense for all stock awards is recognized in the first years of the vesting period. Overall, stock-based compensation decreased due to this accelerated vesting and the time that has lapsed since our original stock options that were granted in 2000 and 2001. Partially offsetting these increases was the impact of our CME/CBOT Common Clearing Link agreement, whereby $0.7 million of compensation and benefits expense will be reimbursed by CBOT for the second quarter of 2003. There was no similar reimbursement arrangement in the second quarter of 2002.
Occupancy Expense. Occupancy expense increased $1.0 million, or 18.6%, from $5.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 to $6.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003. Increased operating expenses for our premises as well as increased insurance costs resulted in $0.8 million of this increase. In addition, the impact of additional space we now lease at our main location resulted in greater rent expense in the second quarter of 2003.
Professional Fees, Outside Services and Licenses Expense. Professional fees, outside services and licenses decreased $0.8 million, or 9.7%, from $8.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 to $7.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003. The decrease resulted primarily from a $1.0 million decrease in legal fees incurred in the second quarter of 2002 for the Wagner patent litigation that was resolved later in 2002. There were no similar expenses in the second quarter of 2003. Partially offsetting this reduction was a $0.3 million increase in license fees relating to increased trading volume for our equity products from the second quarter of 2002 to the second quarter of 2003. In addition, we experienced an increase in professional fees and services incurred as part of the secondary offering of our stock that was completed in June 2003.
Communications and Computer and Software Maintenance Expense. Communications and computer and software maintenance expense decreased $0.1 million, or 1.3%, from $11.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 to $11.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003. This expense is affected primarily by growth in electronic trading. In the second quarter of 2003, we experienced greater communications expense that included a $0.7 million increase for connections to our GLOBEX platform that was offset by a $1.0 million refund from our telecommunications provider as a result of billing errors. We received a similar refund of $0.5 million in the first quarter of 2003 and our review of past billings from this vendor is complete. In addition, we experienced lower equipment
23
rental costs in the second quarter of 2003 as a result of recent decisions to purchase, rather than lease, certain equipment. Our computer and software maintenance costs are driven by the number of transactions processed, not the volume of contracts traded. We processed nearly 80% of total transactions electronically in the second quarter of 2003 compared to nearly 75% in the second quarter of 2002, which represented approximately 40% and 30%, respectively, of total contracts traded. As a result, the reductions in communications and leasing expenses were partially offset by a $0.3 million increase in our hardware and software maintenance expenses from the second quarter of 2002 to the second quarter of 2003 primarily as a result of recent purchases of hardware and software.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $1.0 million, or 8.0%, from $12.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 to $13.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003. Capital expenditures totaled $56.9 million in 2002, with technology-related purchases representing approximately 90% of total purchases. Additional purchases have also occurred in the first six months of 2003. Equipment and software represent the greatest portion of these technology-related purchases and are depreciated over a three or four year period. These recent purchases, which include the development of software for internal use, have resulted in increased depreciation and amortization expense from the second quarter of 2002 to the second quarter of 2003.
Marketing, Advertising and Public Relations Expense. Marketing, advertising and public relations expense increased $0.1 million, or 13.3%, from $1.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 to $1.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003. In the second quarter of 2003, additional expenses were incurred for marketing materials and promotional events.
Other Expense. Other expense increased $0.2 million, or 3.0%, from $5.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 to $5.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003. The primary factor in this increase was a $0.5 million increase in our insurance expense, as well as additional expense for annual listing fees and franchise taxes as a result of our recent initial public offering and increased currency delivery fees. These increases were partially offset by reductions in bank fees, travel and other general administrative expenses.
Income Tax Provision
We recorded an income tax provision of $24.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 compared to $13.5 million for the same period in 2002. The effective tax rate was 41.0% for the second quarter of 2003, compared to 39.1% for the second quarter of 2002. The increase in the effective tax rate for 2003 resulted primarily from expenses incurred in connection with the June 2003 secondary offering that are not deductible for tax purposes.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash and cash equivalents totaled $392.8 million at June 30, 2003, compared to $339.3 million at December 31, 2002. The $53.5 million increase resulted primarily from our operations for the first six months of 2003. Cash generated by operations was partially offset by $25.0 million for purchases of property, net of trade-in allowances. The balance retained in cash and cash equivalents is a function of anticipated or possible short-term cash needs, prevailing interest rates, our investment policy and alternative investment choices.
Other current assets readily convertible into cash include accounts receivable. When combined with cash and cash equivalents, these assets represented 75.3% of our total assets, excluding cash performance bonds and security deposits and investment of securities lending proceeds, at June 30, 2003, compared to 72.0% at December 31, 2002. Cash performance bonds and security deposits, as well as any investment of securities lending proceeds, are excluded from total assets and total liabilities for
24
purposes of this comparison as these balances may vary significantly over time and there are equal and offsetting current liabilities that relate to these current assets.
Included in other assets is $22.1 million and $17.3 million of deferred tax assets at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively. These deferred tax assets result primarily from depreciation, stock-based compensation and deferred compensation. There is no valuation reserve for these assets as we expect to fully realize their value in the future based on our expectation of future taxable income.
Historically, we have met our funding requirements from operations. Net cash provided by operating activities was $90.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 compared to $46.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002, an increase of $43.6 million. The cash provided by operations increased in 2003 as a result of our improved operating results as well as an increase in current liabilities that was partially offset by an increase in accounts receivable. The increase in accounts receivable resulted primarily from the increase in trading volume in June 2003 that generated additional clearing and transaction fees. The increase in current liabilities resulted primarily from increased bonus and tax liabilities. The net cash provided by operating activities exceeded our net income in 2002 and 2003 primarily as a result of non-cash expenses, such as depreciation, which do not adversely impact our cash flow.
Cash used in investing activities was $28.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 compared to $47.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002. The decrease resulted primarily from the change in our investment policy that was effective in the third quarter of 2002. Net purchases of investments totaled $11.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002. There were no similar purchases in the first six months of 2003. In addition, net purchases of property decreased $7.7 million, from $32.7 million for the first six months of 2002 to $25.0 million for the same period in 2003. During the second half of 2003, we anticipate capital expenditures of approximately $9 million for leasehold improvements related to the expansion of our lobby and certain office improvements at our main location in addition to other anticipated capital expenditures.
Cash used in financing activities was $8.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 compared to $20.3 million for the same period in 2002. Cash dividends totaled $9.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 as a result of our regular quarterly dividend. This is a decrease of $8.2 million from the $17.3 million one-time cash dividend paid in the first six months of 2002 prior to our initial public offering. Also, in the first six months of 2003 we received $3.2 million of proceeds from the exercise of stock options. Cash used in financing activities for both periods includes regularly scheduled payments on long-term debt.
As of June 30, 2003, we were contingently liable on irrevocable letters of credit totaling $83.0 million in connection with our mutual offset system with The Singapore Derivatives Exchange Ltd. We also guarantee the principal for funds invested in the first IEF facility, which had a balance of $231.9 million as of June 30, 2003.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market risk represents interest rate risk relating to the marketable securities that are available for sale, as well as derivatives trading risk associated with GFX. With respect to interest rate risk, a change in market interest rates would impact interest income from short-term cash investments and cash performance bonds and security deposits. Changes in market interest rates also would have an effect on the fair value of any marketable securities owned. However, as a result of our investment policy that became effective in the third quarter of 2002, we invest only in cash equivalents composed primarily of institutional money market mutual funds and obligations of the U.S. Government and its agencies with maturities of seven days or less. Under our prior investment policy, we monitored interest rate risk by completing regular reviews of our marketable securities portfolio and its sensitivity to changes in the general level of interest rates, commonly referred to as a portfolio's duration. We controlled the
25
duration of the portfolio primarily through the purchase of individual marketable securities having a duration consistent with our overall investment policy. In addition, under our prior investment policy, we would generally hold marketable securities to maturity, which acted as a further mitigating factor with respect to interest rate risk.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest income from marketable securities, short-term cash investments and cash performance bonds and security deposits was $2.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2003 compared to $3.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2002. At June 30, 2003, we owned no marketable securities as a result of our investment policy that became effective in the third quarter of 2002.
GFX Trading Risk
GFX engages in the purchase and sale of our foreign exchange and Eurodollar futures contracts on the GLOBEX electronic trading platform to promote liquidity in our products and subsequently enters into offsetting transactions using futures contracts, spot foreign exchange transactions with approved counterparties in the interbank market or forward contracts to limit market risk. Any potential impact on earnings from a change in foreign exchange rates would not be significant. Net position limits are established for each trader and currently amount to $12.0 million in aggregate notional value.
At June 30, 2003, GFX held futures positions with a notional value of $206.2 million, offset by a similar amount of spot and forward foreign exchange positions. The notional value of futures positions at June 30, 2002 was $47.5 million. All positions are marked to market through a charge or credit to other revenue on a daily basis. Net trading gains were $3.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and $1.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
26
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
(c) The annual meeting of shareholders of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Holdings Inc. was held on April 22, 2003. The matters voted on at the meeting, and the results of the voting, were as follows:
1. Election of Directors
Equity Director Nominee |
Votes For |
Votes Withheld |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Terrence A. Duffy | 19,140,729 | 2,166,653 | ||
James J. McNulty | 20,175,210 | 1,132,172 | ||
Daniel R. Glickman | 19,927,551 | 1,379,831 | ||
William P. Miller II | 20,178,659 | 1,128,723 | ||
James E. Oliff | 19,837,147 | 1,470,235 | ||
John F. Sandner | 17,893,571 | 3,413,811 | ||
Terry L. Savage | 19,101,318 | 2,206,063 |
Class B-1 Director Nominee |
Votes For |
Abstentions |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
William G. Salatich, Jr. (elected) | 278 | 103 | ||
Thomas A. Bentley | 86 | 295 |
Class B-2 Director Nominee |
Votes For |
Abstentions |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
David J. Wescott (elected) | 349 | 115 | ||
Richard J. Appel | 86 | 378 |
Class B-3 Director Nominee |
Votes For |
Abstentions |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Gary M. Katler (elected) | 342 | 328 | ||
Leon C. Shender | 170 | 501 | ||
Thomas J. Esposito | 152 | 518 |
27
2. Election of Class B Nominating Committees
Nominee |
Votes For |
Abstentions |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
William F. Kulp (elected) | 230 | 161 | ||
Lonnie Klein (elected) | 216 | 175 | ||
Jeffrey R. Carter (elected) | 208 | 183 | ||
John C. Garrity (elected) | 206 | 185 | ||
Larry S. Fields (elected) | 197 | 194 | ||
Michael J. Downs | 197 | 194 | ||
Donald A. Huizinga | 191 | 200 | ||
Kevin P. Tunney | 148 | 243 | ||
Larry Katz | 106 | 285 | ||
David J. Klusendorf | 69 | 322 |
Nominee |
Votes For |
Abstentions |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Denis P. Duffey (elected) | 304 | 161 | ||
Donald J. Lanphere, Jr. (elected) | 285 | 180 | ||
Michael P. Mullins (elected) | 262 | 204 | ||
Richard J. Duran (elected) | 237 | 228 | ||
James P. Shannon (elected) | 185 | 281 | ||
Samuel T. Bailey | 174 | 291 | ||
William J. Higgins | 170 | 295 | ||
Michael T. Klemke | 133 | 332 | ||
Steven D. Peake | 121 | 345 | ||
Frank N. Morgan | 94 | 372 |
3. Amendment to the Chicago Mercantile Exchange Holdings Inc. Amended and Restated Omnibus Stock Plan
A proposal to amend the Chicago Mercantile Exchange Holdings Inc.'s Amended and Restated Omnibus Stock Plan was approved by the Class A and Class B shareholders voting together as a single class. The results were as follows:
Votes For |
Votes Against |
Abstentions |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
15,317,339 | 3,678,588 | 1,123,334 |
4. A proposal to approve the Chicago Mercantile Exchange Holdings Inc. Annual Incentive Plan was approved by Class A and Class B shareholders voting together as a single class. The results were as follows:
Votes For |
Votes Against |
Abstentions |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
15,122,528 | 3,691,823 | 1,304,910 |
5. A proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as the Chicago Mercantile Exchange Holdings Inc.'s independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003
28
was approved by Class A and Class B shareholders voting together as a single class. The results were as follows:
Votes For |
Votes Against |
Abstentions |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
20,046,678 | 910,346 | 350,356 |
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits:
10.1 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange Holdings Inc. Annual Incentive Plan | |||
10.2 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange Holdings Inc. Amended and Restated Omnibus Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Chicago Mercantile Exchange Holdings Inc.'s Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed with the SEC on May 14, 2003, File No. 333-105236) | |||
10.3 | Clearing Services Agreement, dated April 16, 2003, between Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. and The Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc.* | |||
10.4 | Agreement, dated as of July 10, 2003, between Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. and David G. Gomach. | |||
31.1 | Section 302 CertificationJames J. McNulty, President and Chief Executive Officer | |||
31.2 | Section 302 CertificationDavid G. GomachManaging Director and Chief Financial Officer | |||
32 | Section 906 Certification |
(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
On April 17, 2003, Chicago Mercantile Exchange Holdings Inc. furnished a Current Report on Form 8-K reporting under Item 9 that it had issued a joint press release with the Chicago Board of Trade ("CBOT") announcing that they have reached an agreement for Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Holdings Inc., to provide clearing, settlement and related services for all CBOT products.
On April 22, 2003, Chicago Mercantile Exchange Holdings Inc. furnished a Current Report on Form 8-K reporting under Items 9 and 12 that it had issued a press release reporting its financial results for the first quarter of 2003.
29
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE HOLDINGS INC. (Registrant) |
||||
August 11, 2003 |
By |
/s/ DAVID G. GOMACH David G. Gomach Chief Financial Officer |
30
Exhibit 10.1
CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE HOLDINGS INC.
ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN
1. Purpose. The purpose of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange Holdings Inc. Annual Incentive Plan is to align the interests of Company management with those of the shareholders of the Company by encouraging management to achieve goals intended to increase shareholder value.
2. Definitions. The following terms, as used herein, shall have the following meanings:
(a) "Award" shall mean an incentive compensation award, granted pursuant to the Plan, which is contingent upon the attainment of Performance Factors with respect to a Performance Period.
(b) "Board" shall mean the Board of Directors of the Company.
(c) "Code" shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
(d) "Committee" shall mean the Compensation Committee of the Board or such other committee as may be appointed by the Board to administer the Plan in accordance with Section 3 of the Plan.
(e) "Common Stock" shall mean the common stock of the Company, par value $0.01 per share.
(f) "Company" shall mean Chicago Mercantile Exchange Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation, or any successor corporation.
(g) "Disability" shall mean permanent disability as determined pursuant to the long-term disability plan or policy of the Company or its Subsidiaries in effect at the time of such disability and applicable to a Participant.
(h) "Effective Date" shall mean January 1, 2003.
(i) "Exchange Act" shall mean the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
(j) "Participant" shall mean an employee of the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company who is, pursuant to Section 4 of the Plan, selected to participate herein.
(k) "Performance Factors" shall mean the criteria and objectives, determined by the Committee, which must be met during the applicable Performance Period as a condition of the Participant's receipt of payment with respect to an Award. Performance Factors may include any or all of the following or any combination thereof: gross margin, operating margin, revenue growth, free cash flow, operating cash flow, earnings per share, economic value added, cash-flow return on investment, net income, total shareholder return, return on investment, return on equity, return on assets or any increase or decrease of one or more of the foregoing over a specified period. Such Performance Factors may relate to the performance of the Company, a Subsidiary, any portion of the business, product line, or any combination thereof and may be expressed on an aggregate, per share (outstanding or fully diluted) or per unit basis. Where applicable, the Performance Factors may be expressed in terms of attaining a specified level of the particular criteria, the attainment of a percentage increase or decrease in the particular criteria, or may be applied to the performance of the Company, a Subsidiary, a business unit, a product line, or any combination thereof, relative to a market index, a group of other companies (or their subsidiaries, business units or product lines), or a combination thereof, all as determined by the Committee. Performance Factors may include a threshold level of performance below which no payment shall be made, levels of performance below the target level but above the threshold level at which specified percentages of the Award shall be paid, a target level of performance at which the full Award shall be paid, levels of performance above the target level but below the maximum level at which specified multiples of the Award shall be paid, and a maximum level of performance above which no additional payment
shall be made. Performance Factors may also specify that payments for levels of performances between specified levels will be interpolated.
(l) "Performance Period" shall mean the twelve-month periods commencing on January 1, 2003 and each January 1 thereafter, or such other periods as the Committee shall determine; provided that a Performance Period for a Participant who becomes employed by the Company or its Subsidiaries following the commencement of a Performance Period may be a shorter period that commences with the date of the commencement of such employment.
(m) "Plan" shall mean this Chicago Mercantile Exchange Holdings Inc. Annual Incentive Plan.
(n) "Subsidiary" shall mean any company, partnership, limited liability company, business or entity (other than the Company) of which at least 50% of the combined voting power of its voting securities is, or the operations and management are, directly or indirectly controlled by the Company.
3. Administration. The Plan shall be administered by a Committee of the Board. The Committee shall have the authority in its sole discretion, subject to and not inconsistent with the express provisions of the Plan, to administer the Plan and to exercise all the powers and authorities either specifically granted to it under the Plan or necessary or advisable in the administration of the Plan, including, without limitation, the authority to grant Awards; to determine the persons to whom and the time or times at which Awards shall be granted; to determine the terms, conditions, restrictions and Performance Factors relating to any Award; to determine whether, to what extent, and under what circumstances an Award may be settled, cancelled, forfeited, or surrendered; to make adjustments in the Performance Factors in recognition of unusual or non-recurring events affecting the Company or its Subsidiaries or the financial statements of the Company or its Subsidiaries, or in response to changes in applicable laws, regulations or accounting principles; to construe and interpret the Plan and any Award; to prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to the Plan; to determine the terms and provisions of Awards (including provisions relating to a change in control of the Company); and to make all other determinations deemed necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Committee shall have the sole discretion to determine whether, or to what extent, Performance Factors are achieved; provided, however, that the Committee shall have the authority to make appropriate adjustments in Performance Factors under an Award to reflect the impact of extraordinary items not reflected in such goals. For purposes of the Plan, extraordinary items shall be defined as (1) any profit or loss attributable to acquisitions or dispositions of stock or assets, (2) any changes in accounting standards or treatments that may be required or permitted by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or adopted by the Company or its Subsidiaries after the goal is established, (3) all items of gain, loss or expense for the year related to restructuring charges for the Company or its Subsidiaries, (4) all items of gain, loss or expense for the year determined to be extraordinary or unusual in nature or infrequent in occurrence or related to the disposal of a segment of a business, (5) all items of gain, loss or expense for the year related to discontinued operations that do not qualify as a segment of a business as defined in APB Opinion No. 30 (or successor literature), (6) the impact of capital expenditures, (7) the impact of share repurchases and other changes in the number of outstanding shares, and (8) such other items as may be prescribed by Section 162(m) of the Code and the Treasury Regulations thereunder as may be in effect from time to time, and any amendments, revisions or successor provisions and any changes thereto.
The Committee shall consist of two or more persons each of whom shall be an "outside director" within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code. All decisions, determinations and interpretations of the Committee shall be final and binding on all persons, including the Company and the Participant (or any person claiming any rights under the Plan from or through any Participant).
2
Subject to Section 162(m) of the Code or as otherwise required for compliance with other applicable law, the Committee may delegate all or any part of its authority under the Plan.
4. Eligibility. Awards may be granted to Participants in the sole discretion of the Committee. In determining the persons to whom Awards shall be granted and the Performance Factors relating to each Award, the Committee shall take into account such factors as the Committee shall deem relevant in connection with accomplishing the purposes of the Plan.
5. Terms of Awards. Awards granted pursuant to the Plan shall be communicated to Participants in such form as the Committee shall from time to time approve and the terms and conditions of such Awards shall be set forth therein.
(a) In General. On or prior to the date on which 25% of a Performance Period has elapsed, the Committee shall specify in writing, by resolution of the Committee or other appropriate action, the Participants for such Performance Period and the Performance Factors applicable to each Award for each Participant with respect to such Performance Period. Unless otherwise provided by the Committee in connection with specified terminations of employment, payment in respect of Awards shall be made only if and to the extent the minimum Performance Factors with respect to such Performance Period are attained.
(b) Special Provisions Regarding Awards. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall payment in respect of Awards granted hereunder exceed $2,500,000 to any one Participant in any one year. The Committee may at its discretion decrease the amount of an Award payable upon attainment of the specified Performance Factors, but in no event may the Committee increase at its discretion the amount of an Award payable upon attainment of the specified Performance Factors.
(c) Time and Form of Payment. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, all payments in respect of Awards granted under this Plan shall be made in cash within one hundred and twenty (120) days after the end of the Performance Period.
6. Term. Subject to the approval of the Plan by the holders of a majority of the Common Stock represented and voting on the proposal at the annual meeting of Company stockholders to be held in 2003 (or any adjournment thereof), the Plan shall be effective as of January 1, 2003 and shall continue in effect until the fifth anniversary of the date of such stockholder approval, unless earlier terminated as provided below.
7. General Provisions.
(a) Compliance with Legal Requirements. The Plan and the granting and payment of Awards, and the other obligations of the Company under the Plan shall be subject to all applicable federal and state laws, rules and regulations, and to such approvals by any regulatory or governmental agency as may be required.
(b) Nontransferability. Awards shall not be transferable by a Participant except upon the Participant's death following the end of the Performance Period but prior to the date payment is made, in which case the Award shall be transferable in accordance with any beneficiary designation made by the Participant in accordance with Section 7(k) below or, in the absence thereof, by will or the laws of descent and distribution.
(c) No Right To Continued Employment. Nothing in the Plan or in any Award granted pursuant hereto shall confer upon any Participant the right to continue in the employ of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or to be entitled to any remuneration or benefits not set forth in the Plan or to interfere with or limit in any way whatever rights otherwise exist of the Company or its Subsidiaries to terminate such Participant's employment or change such Participant's remuneration.
3
(d) Withholding Taxes. Where a Participant or other person is entitled to receive a payment pursuant to an Award hereunder, the Company shall have the right either to deduct from the payment, or to require the Participant or such other person to pay to the Company prior to delivery of such payment, an amount sufficient to satisfy any federal, state, local or other withholding tax requirements related thereto.
(e) Amendment, Termination and Duration of the Plan. The Board or the Committee may at any time and from time to time alter, amend, suspend, or terminate the Plan in whole or in part; provided that, no amendment that requires stockholder approval in order for the Plan to continue to comply with Code Section 162(m) shall be effective unless the same shall be approved by the requisite vote of the stockholders of the Company. Notwithstanding the foregoing (but subject to Section (j)), no amendment shall affect adversely any of the rights of any Participant under any Award following the grant of such Award, provided that neither an adjustment of an Award (as contemplated by Section 3) nor the exercise of the Committee's discretion pursuant to Section 5(b) to reduce the amount of an Award shall not be deemed an impermissible amendment of the Plan or an Award.
(f) Participant Rights. No Participant shall have any claim to be granted any Award under the Plan, and there is no obligation for uniformity of treatment for Participants.
(g) Termination of Employment.
(i) Unless otherwise provided by the Committee, and except as set forth in subparagraph (ii) of this Section 7(g), a Participant must be actively employed by the Company or its Subsidiaries at the time Awards are generally paid with respect to a Performance Period in order to be eligible to receive payment in respect of such Award.
(ii) Unless otherwise provided by the Committee, if a Participant's employment is terminated as result of death, Disability or voluntary retirement with the consent of the Company prior to the end of the Performance Period, such Participant shall receive a pro rata portion of the Award that he or she would have received with respect to the applicable Performance Period, which shall be payable at the time payment is made to other Participants in respect of such Performance Period.
(h) Unfunded Status of Awards. The Plan is intended to constitute an "unfunded" plan for incentive and deferred compensation. With respect to any payments not yet made to a Participant pursuant to an Award, nothing contained in the Plan or any Award shall give any such Participant any rights that are greater than those of a general creditor of the Company.
(i) Governing Law. The Plan and all determinations made and actions taken pursuant hereto shall be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware without giving effect to the conflict of laws principles thereof.
(j) Effective Date. The Plan shall take effect upon its adoption by the Board; provided, however, that the Plan shall be subject to the requisite approval of the stockholders of the Company in order to comply with Section 162(m) of the Code. In the absence of such approval, the Plan (and any Awards made pursuant to the Plan prior to the date of such approval) shall be null and void.
(k) Beneficiary. A Participant may file with the Committee a written designation of a beneficiary on such form as may be prescribed by the Committee and may, from time to time, amend or revoke such designation. If no designated beneficiary survives the Participant and an Award is payable to the Participant's beneficiary pursuant to Section 7(b), the executor or administrator of the Participant's estate shall be deemed to be the grantee's beneficiary.
(l) Interpretation. The Plan is designed and intended to comply, to the extent applicable, with Section 162(m) of the Code, and all provisions hereof shall be construed in a manner to so comply.
4
Exhibit 10.3
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omissions have been indicated by asterisks ("*****"), and the omitted text has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
CLEARING SERVICES AGREEMENT
EFFECTIVE THE 16th DAY OF APRIL 2003
BETWEEN
CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE INC., a business corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware and having its principal office situated at 30 South Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60606 U.S.A., duly represented by its Chairman of the Board, Terrence Duffy, and by its President and Chief Executive Officer, James J. McNulty, (hereinafter referred to at times as "CME"),
AND
THE BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, INC., a non share corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware and having its principal office situated at 141 W. Jackson Blvd., Chicago, Illinois 60604 U.S.A., duly represented by its Chairman, Charles P. Carey, and by its President and Chief Executive Officer, Bernard W. Dan, (hereinafter referred to at times as "CBOT").
Each of CBOT and CME is referred to herein as a "Party", and collectively they are referred to as the "Parties."
RECITALS:
WHEREAS, CME is registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the "CFTC") as a designated contract market ("DCM") and a "derivative clearing organization" ("DCO") within the meaning of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended (the "CEA"), and seeks to provide clearing services, as defined herein, for CBOT futures and options contracts;
WHEREAS, CBOT is registered with the CFTC as a DCM and intends to register as a DCO within the meaning of the CEA, as amended, and seeks to have CME provide clearing services, as defined herein, for CBOT futures and options contracts;
WHEREAS, the Parties intend to provide substantial benefits to their customers by clearing their listed contracts through the same clearing house;
WHEREAS, the Parties intend to enhance the efficient use of capital by their members by employing CME's system of financial guarantees and providing for more efficient portfolio risk margining of certain positions held at CME's clearing house; and
WHEREAS, the Parties intend to cooperatively promote the advantages of clearing certain CBOT products by means of CME systems, all on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and with the intent to be legally bound, the Parties hereby agree as follows:
1. INTERPRETATION
In this Agreement, unless the context otherwise requires:
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omissions have been indicated by asterisks ("*****"), and the omitted text has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
2
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omissions have been indicated by asterisks ("*****"), and the omitted text has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Schedule A | Clearing Services | |
Schedule B | Fees | |
Schedule C | Project Development Plan |
3. Clearing Services.
3
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omissions have been indicated by asterisks ("*****"), and the omitted text has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
4
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omissions have been indicated by asterisks ("*****"), and the omitted text has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
5
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omissions have been indicated by asterisks ("*****"), and the omitted text has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
4. CBOT Payment of Fees and Expenses.
5. CME Intellectual Property.
6
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omissions have been indicated by asterisks ("*****"), and the omitted text has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
6. CBOT Contracts Subject to Clearing Services
7
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omissions have been indicated by asterisks ("*****"), and the omitted text has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
7. Admission of CBOT Clearing Members.
8
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omissions have been indicated by asterisks ("*****"), and the omitted text has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
8. Transfer of CBOT Open Interest.
9
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omissions have been indicated by asterisks ("*****"), and the omitted text has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
9. Network Interconnections Between CBOT and CME
10. Breach of Agreement; Termination.
10
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omissions have been indicated by asterisks ("*****"), and the omitted text has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
11
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omissions have been indicated by asterisks ("*****"), and the omitted text has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
12
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omissions have been indicated by asterisks ("*****"), and the omitted text has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
13
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omissions have been indicated by asterisks ("*****"), and the omitted text has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
13. Confidentiality.
14
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omissions have been indicated by asterisks ("*****"), and the omitted text has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
15. Liability Limits; Indemnification.
16. Indemnity
15
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omissions have been indicated by asterisks ("*****"), and the omitted text has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
18. Public Announcements.
19. Miscellaneous.
16
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omissions have been indicated by asterisks ("*****"), and the omitted text has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
CME Contact | CBOT Contact | |
Mr. Craig Donohue Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. 30 South Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60606 Facsimile No.: 312-930-3323 |
Ms. Carole Burke Executive Vice President, Chief of Staff and General Counsel CBOT 141 W. Jackson Blvd Chicago, Illinois 60604 Facsimile No.: 312-341-3392 |
17
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omissions have been indicated by asterisks ("*****"), and the omitted text has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
18
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omissions have been indicated by asterisks ("*****"), and the omitted text has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the date first above written.
CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE INC. | THE BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, INC. | |||||||||
By: |
/s/ TERRENCE A. DUFFY Terrence A. Duffy, Chairman of the Board, CME |
By: |
/s/ CHARLES P. CAREY Charles P. Carey Chairman of the Board, CBOT |
|||||||
Date: | |
Date: | |
|||||||
By: |
/s/ JAMES J. MCNULTY James J. McNulty President and Chief Executive Officer |
By: |
/s/ BERNARD W. DAN Bernard W. Dan President and Chief Executive Officer |
|||||||
Date: | |
Date: | |
19
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omissions have been indicated by asterisks ("*****"), and the omitted text has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
SCHEDULE A
DESCRIPTION OF CLEARING AND SETTLEMENT SERVICES
In accordance with the terms of this Agreement, CME shall provide clearing services as follows with respect to transactions in CBOT Products:
Electronic Trade Acceptance. CME shall accept for clearing and guarantee matched trades submitted to CME by CBOT (or CBOT's electronic trade matching facility service provider) in accordance with the CME Rules and the Operational Policies and Procedures in effect from time to time.
Pit Trade AcceptanceElectronic Devices. CME shall receive unmatched trade records submitted to CME by CBOT from electronic pit trading technology devices, and CME shall accept for clearing and guarantee such trades upon matching by CME in accordance with the CME Rules and the Operational Policies and Procedures in effect from time to time.
Pit Trade AcceptanceOpen Outcry. CME shall receive unmatched trade records submitted to CME by Special CME Clearing Members for trades executed without benefit of electronic pit trading technology devices, and CME shall accept for clearing and guarantee such trades upon matching by CME in accordance with the CME Rules and the Operational Policies and Procedures in effect from time to time.
Ex-Pit Trade Acceptance. CME shall receive unmatched trade records submitted to CME by Special CME Clearing Members for ex-pit trades (blocks and EFPs) that are executed in accordance with CBOT rules, and CME shall accept for clearing and guarantee such trades upon payment of initial settlement variation and performance bond by the applicable settlement bank for each party to the transaction, as set forth in the CME Rules and the Operational Policies and Procedures in effect from time to time.
Requirements for CME Trade Acceptance. In addition to the other requirements that may be set forth in this Agreement, the CME Rules and the Operational Policies and Procedures, the following requirements apply to CME's receipt and acceptance for clearing of trades as set forth in this Schedule A:
Origins for Matched and Unmatched Trade Records. CME will support up to four origins for transactions in CBOT Productshouse, house market-maker, customer, and customer market-makersubject to final confirmation by CBOT promptly following the effective date.
Report Formats. Message formats for trade records, including but not limited to, trade registers, out-trade and EQC reports, and brokers' matched and unmatched trade reports shall conform to CME specifications.
Opposite House Switches. CME will not support the current modified contra matching practice currently employed by BOTCC with respect to unmatched trades in CBOT products. However, CME will facilitate matching of unmatched trades by performing automatic opposite house switches for unmatched trades in CBOT products, as CME does for unmatched trades in its own products, in accordance with the CME Rules and the Operational Policies and Procedures. CME will explore the functional requirements for integrating modified contra-matching processes as a possible enhancement after the Launch Date.
SLEDs. CME will not support single-line spread entry functionality ("SLEDs") as of the Launch Date. CME will use reasonable efforts, in consultation with CBOT, to implement SLEDs for transactions in CBOT products by February 20, 2004.
A-1
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omissions have been indicated by asterisks ("*****"), and the omitted text has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Position Maintenance and Settlement. On a daily basis CME shall calculate and collect original margin, premium and variation margin on futures and options trades and positions in the accounts of Special CME Clearing Members. CME shall settle the gains and losses associated with futures and options trades and positions in the accounts of clearing members at least once each business day, typically twice each business day, and more frequently as CME determines is warranted by market volatility.
CME PCS Process. CME's position change submission (PCS) process will be used for reporting final positions and spreadable positions and to determine each clearing member's final position for margining purposes and for exercise and assignment of options, as well as for determining the exchange open interest to be reported for each business day.
Net Margining of CBOT Products. CME will support net margining of positions in CBOT Products in substantially the same manner as the current procedures employed by BOTCC with respect to performance bond requirements. Notwithstanding the foregoing, CME may adjust formulas for calculating security deposit requirements or assessment of security deposit contributions with respect to net-margined products, as CME in its reasonable discretion deems appropriate in order to fairly and equitably calculate security deposit requirements, given differences between positions subject to gross margining and positions subject to net margining.
SPAN Files. CME will generate and distribute to Special CME Clearing Members' and customers' SPAN files reflecting SPAN margining of positions in CBOT Products. SPAN files will be distributed over the internet and through any other means specified in the CME Rules and the Operational Policies and Procedures. CME may generate and distribute joint SPAN files for positions in CBOT Products, CME products and products of any other exchange for which CME provides clearing services or linked clearing.
Authority Over Clearing Firm Margin Requirements. CME will work with CBOT to develop a coordinated performance bond / margin review process such that CME can receive input from CBOT as to performance bond / margin requirements. Such process shall involve monthly meetings with representatives designated by CBOT and will involve data analysis and discussions with respect to how and when to implement changes to clearing firm level performance bond / margin requirements; provided however, that ultimate control over performance bond / margin requirements at the clearing member level shall reside with CME. Notwithstanding the foregoing, CME agrees that determinations by CME with respect to performance bond / margin requirements for CBOT Core Products shall be made strictly on the basis of risk management principles and shall not involve competitive considerations associated with CME products and competing CBOT Products. Additionally, CME shall not recognize clearing member level spreads between CBOT Products and products of any other exchange without the prior written approval of CBOT.
Authority Over Customer Level Requirements. CBOT shall have ultimate control over customer level exchange minimum performance bond / margin and spread requirements, provided that CBOT shall consult with CME as to such requirements as a part of the coordinated review process to be developed between CME and CBOT.
Acceptable Collateral. CME will review the forms of collateral currently accepted by BOTCC that are not currently accepted by CME and, where in CME's judgment such additional forms of collateral are frequently used and not unduly costly or risky to accept, CME will amend the CME Rules to accept such forms of collateral with respect to CBOT Products. Notwithstanding the foregoing, CME will conduct this review process prior to the Launch Date only if time permits.
Transfers. CME shall effect the transfer of positions in CBOT Products between Special CME Clearing Members, where applicable, in accordance with the CME Rules and Operational Policies and Procedures in effect from time to time. Transferred positions will be guaranteed by CME to the
A-2
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omissions have been indicated by asterisks ("*****"), and the omitted text has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
transferee only upon payment of initial settlement variation and performance bond by the transferor or the transferee, as applicable.
Give-Up Transactions. CME will make the allocate claim system ("ACS") available to Special CME Clearing Members for processing give-up transactions.
Exercise and Assignment. CME will provide exercise and assignment functionality to Special CME Clearing Members with respect to positions in options products, including at option expiration, as set forth in the CME Rules and the Operational Policies and Procedures. CME will not support option expiration processing on Saturdays, and option expiration processing for CBOT Products as of the Launch Date will be completed on Fridays (or another business day, with respect to Friday holidays) in accordance with the CME Rules and the Operational Policies and Procedures.
Deliveries. CME will provide automated support to CBOT in connection with deliveries management of CBOT Products, including inventory of deliverable positions, inventory of deliverable supply, delivery intent processing, delivery assignment, and delivery invoicing, except that CBOT shall maintain responsibility for management and operation of the registration and delivery process. CME will provide automated deliveries support as of the Launch Date of financial and equity CBOT Products that are listed for trading by CBOT as of the Effective Date. CME will use its best efforts to implement automated deliveries support of other CBOT Products that are listed for trading by CBOT as of the Effective Date, including agricultural products, as of the Launch Date or as soon thereafter as is practicable. CME shall provide automated deliveries support for new CBOT Products (or for changed features of existing CBOT Products) listed for trading by CBOT after the Effective Date, provided that the product characteristics permit automation of deliveries management through means substantially similar to those that CME then employs with respect to other products cleared by CME. If significant development work will be required by CME to provide automated deliveries support for such products listed for trading by CBOT after the Effective Date, the work will be subject to the change request procedures set forth in Section 3.10.
Settlement Banks. CME will interface with all banks that serve as settlement banks for transactions in CME products to provide settlement services for transactions in CBOT Products also, provided that such banks agree to serve as settlement banks for transactions in CBOT Products. Additionally, CME will use best efforts to establish a settlement bank relationship with Lakeside Bank and, as appropriate, Burling Bank, prior to the Launch Date.
Large Trader Reports. CME will collect on CBOT's behalf the large trader submissions from Special CME Clearing Members or their clients and forward such submissions to the CFTC and to CBOT for regulatory purposes. The CME clearing house shall be authorized to use this data to perform the type of account level stress testing it performs on its own products to identify concentration of client exposure at a clearing member. CME shall facilitate reporting of large trader data for CBOT products by accepting transmissions of such data in standard formats. CME shall construct an application that maintains a database of firms, customer accounts, and EINs (the term CBOT uses for the number used to aggregate customer accounts by beneficial owner). For each reported position, the application shall search in the database by the firm and customer account: a) if the firm and customer account is found, the application shall tag the position with the EIN for it; and b) if the firm and customer account is not found, the application shall assign the EIN, using CBOT's standard convention, and tag the position with the newly-assigned EIN. The application shall then prepare a datafile of reported positions for transmission to CBOT, with each position tagged with its EIN. The application shall further provide CBOT staff with an interface for viewing and modifying the EIN assigned to a particular firm and customer account. CBOT shall provide an initial datafile or files for loading this application with its existing EINs and their associated firm and customer accounts. CME shall prepare position limit reports against the large trader data for provision to CBOT. Other than these enumerated processes, all
A-3
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omissions have been indicated by asterisks ("*****"), and the omitted text has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
responsibility for large trader reporting analysis and other larger trader-related functions remains with CBOT.
Calculation and Collection of Fees. CME will calculate, bill and collect clearing fees from Special CME Clearing Members for transactions in CBOT Products, using the transaction types for which CME currently bills clearing members with respect to transactions in its own products. The rate billed will be determined by CBOT for the fee for initial cleared transactions, including block trades, EFPs and other alternative execution procedures, and by CME for post-trade transaction types (including, without limitation, give-ups, transfers, option exercise and assignment, and deliveries).
Operational Timeline. Except as otherwise set forth in the CME Rules or the Operational Policies and Procedures, the operational timeline for clearing services and submission of reports for transactions and positions in CBOT Products shall be the same as it is with respect to transactions and positions for CME products. CME anticipates using single, combined clearing process cycles for both CME products and CBOT Products. Consequently, CME's deadlines and requirements shall apply with respect to processes including, but not limited to, trade report submission deadlines, out-trade report production, final reconciliation and option exercise deadlines, mark-to-market and settlement cycles (including intra-day cycles), collateral substitution and withdrawal deadlines, and pay/collect procedures.
Support for Existing and Future CBOT Product Characteristics. Subject to any specific limitations set forth in this Schedule A or elsewhere in this Agreement, in providing the Clearing Services CME will develop systems and adopt practices as necessary to support the product features and characteristics of CBOT products as they are listed for trading as of the Effective Date, including, without limitation, fractional price formats and variable cabinet pricing. CME shall similarly support new product features and characteristics of existing CBOT Products or those that CBOT may list for trading in the future, provided, however, that if the features and characteristics of such products differ materially from those of products then cleared by CME, CME's support of such new product features or characteristics shall be subject to the change request procedures set forth in Section 3.10.
Security Deposit Management and Assessment. CME will calculate and collect from Special CME Clearing Members security deposit contributions in accordance with the CME Rules and the Operational Policies and Procedures in effect from time to time. CME shall have the authority, as set forth in the CME Rules and the Operational Policies and Procedures in effect from time to time, to seize the security deposits of Special CME Clearing Members and to further exercise certain limited assessment powers in the event of a default by either a Special CME Clearing Member or a CME clearing member. For the avoidance of doubt, CME shall manage a joint security deposit pool for the benefit of Special CME Clearing Members and CME clearing members with respect to transactions in CME products, transactions in CBOT Products, and transactions in the products of any other exchange for which CME provides clearing services or linked clearing, unless CME's agreement with such other exchange prohibits a joint guarantee fund. Consequently, the security deposit contributions of CME-only clearing members may be assessed as a result of defaults as to transactions in CBOT Products, and the contributions of CBOT-only clearing members who are Special CME Clearing Members may be assessed as a result of defaults as to transactions in CME products.
Support for Cross-Margining of CBOT Products. CME will provide support for and will participate in cross-margining of positions in CBOT Products held by Special CME Clearing Members pursuant to CBOT's existing cross-margining arrangements with GSCC and OCC, provided that CBOT shall secure any necessary amendments to substitute CME for BOTCC in its current cross-margining agreements with GSCC and OCC. CME will provide support for and will participate in cross-margining of positions in CBOT Products held by Special CME Clearing Members under any other cross-margining agreements (or amendments to existing agreements) into which CBOT may enter in the future, provided that (i) such support, including without limitation the development of necessary interfaces, shall be subject to the change request procedures set forth in Section 3.10, and (ii) CME may decline
A-4
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omissions have been indicated by asterisks ("*****"), and the omitted text has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
to support such cross-margining agreement if CME concludes, in its sole reasonable judgment after consultation and negotiation with CBOT and the other party, that such proposed cross-margining arrangement presents an unacceptable credit risk to CME.
Information and Reports for CBOT. With respect to each trading day, CME will deliver to CBOT the following reports in accordance with the Operational Policies and Procedures:
Information and Reports From CBOT. CBOT (or a third-party service provider to CBOT, if CBOT delegates such obligation) shall provide the following reports and information to CME in accordance with the Operations Policies and Procedures:
Information and Reports for Clearing Members. CME will make available to each Special CME Clearing Member on every business day the following information, in machine readable format in accordance with the CME Rules and the Operational Policies and Procedures:
A-5
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omissions have been indicated by asterisks ("*****"), and the omitted text has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
File Formats Generally. The formats for data files and/or messages to be exchanged among CME, CBOT, any third-party service provider to CBOT or any other entity with which CME must exchange data in connection with providing Clearing Services, shall be as mutually agreed by CME and CBOT promptly after the execution of this Agreement. If any disagreement arises, generally the principle that the receiving party specifies the format shall control.
Special CME Clearing Member Access to CME Clearing Systems. CME will permit Special CME Clearing Members to access CME's automated and online systems for all clearing and position management functionality for use in connection with positions in CBOT Products on substantially the same basis as CME permits such access with respect to positions in its own products (unless unique characteristics of a particular CBOT Product preclude use of such functionality).
Services Complete. Except as otherwise specified in this Agreement, in the CME Rules or the Operational Policies and Procedures, the services set forth above are the complete clearing services that CME will provide to CBOT pursuant to this Agreement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, CBOT understands that CME will not provide additional services relating to market regulation, generating statistical information, managing time and sales information, managing membership requirements, or daily bulletin processing.
A-6
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omissions have been indicated by asterisks ("*****"), and the omitted text has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Schedule B
*****
B-1
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omissions have been indicated by asterisks ("*****"), and the omitted text has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Schedule C
Project Development Plan
Outlined below are the terms to which the Parties have agreed concerning the development of and compliance with a detailed project plan for implementing the arrangements described in this Agreement.
Terms Relating to Plan
A. Development of the Plan. Immediately following the Effective Date of this Agreement and on an ongoing basis throughout the development period prior to the Launch Date, the Parties will use their best efforts to update the project development plan (the "Plan", as updated from time to time during the development period). The Plan shall identify, with reasonable detail, (i) all material information that must be exchanged between the Parties, (ii) any outstanding matters that must be agreed to between the Parties or decisions that must be reached by one Party, (iii) all material tasks that must be completed by either Party, and (iv) the timeline upon which such tasks must be completed in order to meet the Launch Date. The Parties shall also use their best efforts to jointly develop and incorporate within the Plan an (i) outline and timeline for completing legal documentation, including necessary regulatory filings and any documentation that must be executed by Special CME Clearing Members or other entities, and (ii) and outline and timeline for other communications with Special CME Clearing Members, ISVs, market data vendors, back-office service bureaus and any other entity with which information must be shared in order to effectuate a successful launch of Clearing Services.
B. Mutual Best Efforts to Participate and Adhere to Plan. Each of the Parties shall use its best efforts to participate fully in the planning process and to complete its required tasks in accordance with the timeline identified in the Plan. CME understands and agrees that it has primary responsibility for completing the development work necessary to implement Clearing Services as described in Schedule A. CBOT understands and agrees that it also will have development work to complete in order to effectively implement Clearing Services, including without limitation any development work necessary to provide to CME the information and reports specified to be provided by CBOT in Schedule A. Both Parties understand and agree that their full participation will be required for multiple phases of systems testing, including a comprehensive end-to-end testing phase of the fully integrated systems, which testing may require overtime, weekend and holiday work.
C. Failure to Adhere to Plan. A failure to meet a particular internal deadline set forth in the Plan by either Party shall not be deemed a Material Breach of this Agreement. However, if either Party concludes that a serious failure or multiple failures to conform to the tasks and timelines set forth in the Plan jeopardizes the Parties' ability to meet the Launch Date, the concerned Party shall so notify the relevant management personnel of the other Party (including the individuals identified in Section 19.5) in writing, which may be by e-mail, and the Parties shall use reasonable efforts to resolve the matter and adjust the Plan to the concerned Party's satisfaction. If such efforts are not successful, the concerned Party may, not sooner than ten (10) business days after delivering the notice, submit the matter to arbitration. If the arbitrator concludes that one of the Parties is primarily and substantially at fault for the failure and that the failure does jeopardize the Launch Date, the other Party shall have the option to terminate this Agreement for an Unexcused Breach under Section 10.1, without application of any notice and cure period.
C-1
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The omissions have been indicated by asterisks ("*****"), and the omitted text has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Project Review Teams
Immediately following the Effective Date, each Party will identify individuals to participate in the following review teams, each of which will review matters assigned to it and develop any related elements of the Plan. Where a team is assigned to identify interface requirements or other technical requirements, the team shall produce at least a high-level functional specifications document. The Parties agree that the project review teams shall complete the process of fully defining requirements for each aspect of the project described below by May 16, 2003, meaning that the teams will have decided how to resolve any open issues and have documented and circulated their assigned elements of the Plan, including any functional specifications documents.
A. Product Review Team. Matters to review:
B. Deliveries Review Team. Matters to review:
C. Regulatory Review Team. Matters to review:
D. Membership Review Team. Matters to review:
E. Trade Review Team. Matters to review:
C-2
Exhibit 10.4
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 10th day of July 2003, by and between CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE INC. ("Employer" or "CME"), a Delaware Business Corporation, having its principal place of business at 30 South Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois, and David Gomach ("Employee").
R E C I T A L S:
WHEREAS, Employer wishes to retain the services of Employee in the capacity of Managing Director, Chief Financial Officer, upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth and Employee wishes to accept such employment;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties mutually agree as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, nothing in the Agreement shall preclude Employee from participating in the affairs of any governmental, educational or other charitable institution, engaging in professional speaking and writing activities, and serving as a member of the board of directors of a publicly held corporation (except for a competitor of Employer), provided Employee notifies the Employer's Board of Directors ("Board") prior to his participating in any such activities and as long as the Board does not determine that any such activities interfere with or diminish Employee's obligations under the Agreement. Employee shall be entitled to retain all fees, royalties and other compensation derived from such activities, in addition to the compensation and other benefits payable to him under the Agreement, but shall disclose such fees to Employer.
The exercise of the right of CME to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Section 6(c) shall not abrogate any other rights or remedies of CME in respect of the breach giving rise to such termination.
If Employer terminates Employee's employment for Cause, Employee shall be entitled to accrued Base Salary through the date of the termination of his employment, other employee benefits to which Employee is entitled upon his termination of employment with Employer, in accordance with the terms of the plans and programs of CME. Upon termination for cause,
2
Employee will forfeit any unvested or unearned compensation or long-term incentives, unless otherwise provided herein or specified in the terms of the plans and programs of CME.
3
4
If to CME, to:
James
McNulty
President and Chief Executive Officer
Chicago Mercantile Exchange
30 S. Wacker
Chicago, IL 60606
(312) 930-3100
If to Employee, to:
David
Gomach
600 East Carrington Lane
Appleton, WI 54913
5
jurisdiction, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect the validity, legality or enforceability of any other provision of this Agreement or the validity, legality or enforceability of such provision in any other jurisdiction, but this Agreement shall be reformed, construed and enforced in such jurisdiction as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.
Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. |
David Gomach |
|||
By: |
/s/ JAMES J. MCNULTY |
/s/ DAVID GOMACH |
||
Date: |
Date: |
6
I, James J. McNulty, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:
August 11, 2003 | /s/ JAMES J. McNULTY |
||||
Name: | James J. McNulty | ||||
Title: | President & Chief Executive Officer |
I, David G. Gomach, Managing Director & Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:
August 11, 2003 | /s/ DAVID G. GOMACH |
||||
Name: | David G. Gomach | ||||
Title: | Managing Director & Chief Financial Officer |
Certification
of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Holdings Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), James J. McNulty, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and David G. Gomach, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
/s/ JAMES J. MCNULTY |
||||
Name: | James J. McNulty | |||
Title: | Chief Executive Officer | |||
Date: | August 11, 2003 | |||
/s/ DAVID G. GOMACH |
||||
Name: | David G. Gomach | |||
Title: | Chief Financial Officer | |||
Date: | August 11, 2003 |
This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or is staff upon request.