UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
| x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2004
| ¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Transition Period from to
NYMEX Holdings, Inc.
| Delaware | 333-30332 | 13-4098266 | ||
| (State of Incorporation) | (Commission File Number) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
One North End Avenue
World Financial Center
New York, New York 10282-1101
(212) 299-2000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2) Yes x No ¨
The number of shares of NYMEX Holdings, Inc. capital stock outstanding as of December 28, 2004 was 816. The aggregate market value of NYMEX Holdings, Inc. capital stock held by stockholders of NYMEX Holdings, Inc., as of December 17, 2004 was $1,448,400,000 based upon the average of the bid and ask price for a NYMEX Holdings, Inc. share as of December 17, 2004.
| Page | ||||
| PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||||
| Item 1. | Financial Statements | |||
| 3 | ||||
| Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2004 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2003 |
4 | |||
| 5 | ||||
| 6 | ||||
| 7 | ||||
| Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 17 | ||
| Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk | 37 | ||
| Item 4. | Controls and Procedures | 38 | ||
| PART II: OTHER INFORMATION | ||||
| Item 1. | Legal Proceedings | 39 | ||
| Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 40 | ||
| Item 3. | Defaults upon Senior Securities | 40 | ||
| Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | 40 | ||
| Item 5. | Other Information | 40 | ||
| Item 6. | Exhibits | 41 | ||
| Signatures | 42 | |||
2
NYMEX HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited)
(in thousands, except for share data)
| Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||
| 2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 | |||||||||
| Revenues: |
||||||||||||
| Clearing and transaction fees, net of member rebates |
$ | 50,151 | $ | 33,337 | $ | 138,766 | $ | 102,093 | ||||
| Market data fees, net |
8,210 | 7,632 | 23,882 | 23,952 | ||||||||
| Other, net |
3,592 | 4,876 | 9,001 | 10,458 | ||||||||
| Total revenues |
61,953 | 45,845 | 171,649 | 136,503 | ||||||||
| Expenses: |
||||||||||||
| Salaries and employee benefits |
13,942 | 14,353 | 42,944 | 40,922 | ||||||||
| Occupancy and equipment |
7,232 | 7,128 | 19,453 | 21,029 | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization, net of deferred credit amortization |
6,853 | 4,895 | 17,397 | 14,360 | ||||||||
| General and administrative |
8,367 | 7,195 | 21,494 | 17,062 | ||||||||
| Professional services |
6,532 | 4,508 | 18,972 | 14,020 | ||||||||
| Telecommunications |
1,249 | 1,719 | 4,162 | 4,365 | ||||||||
| Marketing |
430 | 520 | 1,667 | 1,868 | ||||||||
| Other expenses |
2,519 | 1,849 | 6,341 | 6,225 | ||||||||
| Asset impairment and disposition losses |
4,848 | | 5,350 | 977 | ||||||||
| Total expenses |
51,972 | 42,167 | 137,780 | 120,828 | ||||||||
| Income before investment income, interest expense and provision for income taxes |
9,981 | 3,678 | 33,869 | 15,675 | ||||||||
| Investment income and interest expense: | ||||||||||||
| Investment income, net |
1,809 | 643 | 2,225 | 3,393 | ||||||||
| Interest expense |
1,770 | 1,823 | 5,310 | 5,468 | ||||||||
| Income before provision for income taxes |
10,020 | 2,498 | 30,784 | 13,600 | ||||||||
| Provision for income taxes |
4,437 | 960 | 13,637 | 6,130 | ||||||||
| Net income |
$ | 5,583 | $ | 1,538 | $ | 17,147 | $ | 7,470 | ||||
| Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted |
816 | 816 | 816 | 816 | ||||||||
| Basic and diluted earnings per share |
$ | 6,842 | $ | 1,885 | $ | 21,013 | $ | 9,154 | ||||
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3
NYMEX HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except for share data)
| (Unaudited) September 30, |
December 31, | |||||
| Assets |
||||||
| Current assets |
||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 468 | $ | 1,763 | ||
| Securities purchased under agreements to resell |
21,500 | 45,050 | ||||
| Marketable securities, at market value |
129,118 | 64,885 | ||||
| Clearing and transaction fees receivable, net of allowance for member credits |
18,512 | 13,277 | ||||
| Prepaid expenses |
5,700 | 4,115 | ||||
| Deferred tax assets |
4,970 | 4,134 | ||||
| Margin deposits and guaranty funds |
32,326 | 97,238 | ||||
| Other current assets |
6,567 | 8,959 | ||||
| Total current assets |
219,161 | 239,421 | ||||
| Property and equipment, net |
197,554 | 208,787 | ||||
| Goodwill, net of amortization |
16,329 | 16,329 | ||||
| Other assets |
11,466 | 13,139 | ||||
| Total assets |
$ | 444,510 | $ | 477,676 | ||
| Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
||||||
| Current liabilities |
||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
$ | 8,535 | $ | 10,773 | ||
| Accrued salaries and related liabilities |
10,808 | 4,292 | ||||
| Margin deposits and guaranty funds |
32,326 | 97,238 | ||||
| Income tax payable |
11,326 | 10,364 | ||||
| Other current liabilities |
25,968 | 17,126 | ||||
| Total current liabilities |
88,963 | 139,793 | ||||
| Grant for building construction deferred credit |
110,992 | 112,600 | ||||
| Long-term debt |
88,732 | 88,732 | ||||
| Retirement obligation |
11,558 | 11,729 | ||||
| Deferred income taxes |
4,673 | 5,961 | ||||
| Other liabilities |
19,530 | 13,446 | ||||
| Total liabilities |
324,448 | 372,261 | ||||
| Commitments and contingencies (Note 9) |
||||||
| Stockholders equity |
||||||
| Common stock, at $0.01 par value, 816 shares authorized, issued and outstanding at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 |
| | ||||
| Additional paid-in capital |
93,312 | 93,312 | ||||
| Retained earnings |
26,750 | 12,103 | ||||
| Total stockholders equity |
120,062 | 105,415 | ||||
| Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 444,510 | $ | 477,676 | ||
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
NYMEX HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(in thousands, except for share data)
| Common stock |
Additional |
Retained |
Total |
|||||||||||||
| Shares |
Amount |
|||||||||||||||
| Balances at January 1, 2003 |
816 | $ | | $ | 93,312 | $ | 8,223 | $ | 101,535 | |||||||
| Net income |
8,880 | 8,880 | ||||||||||||||
| Dividends declared Common stock, $6,127/share |
(5,000 | ) | (5,000 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Balances at December 31, 2003 |
816 | | 93,312 | 12,103 | 105,415 | |||||||||||
| Net income |
17,147 | 17,147 | ||||||||||||||
| Dividends declared Common stock, $3,067/share |
(2,500 | ) | (2,500 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Balances at September 30, 2004 (Unaudited) |
816 | $ | | $ | 93,312 | $ | 26,750 | $ | 120,062 | |||||||
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
5
NYMEX HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(in thousands)
| Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||
| 2004 |
2003 |
|||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
| Net income |
$ | 17,147 | $ | 7,470 | ||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization |
18,351 | 15,543 | ||||||
| Amortization of intangibles |
654 | 426 | ||||||
| Deferred grant credits |
(1,983 | ) | (1,984 | ) | ||||
| Deferred rental income |
(1,069 | ) | | |||||
| Deferred rent expense |
132 | 362 | ||||||
| Deferred income taxes |
(2,124 | ) | (5,671 | ) | ||||
| Asset impairment and disposition loss |
5,350 | 977 | ||||||
| Decrease (increase) in operating assets: |
||||||||
| Clearing and transaction fees receivable |
(5,235 | ) | 558 | |||||
| Prepaid expenses |
(1,585 | ) | (2,563 | ) | ||||
| Margin deposits and guaranty fund assets |
64,912 | (9,290 | ) | |||||
| Other current assets |
2,392 | (3,385 | ) | |||||
| Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities: |
||||||||
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
(2,238 | ) | (2,204 | ) | ||||
| Accrued salaries and related liabilities |
6,516 | 5,920 | ||||||
| Margin deposits and guaranty fund liabilities |
(64,912 | ) | 9,290 | |||||
| Income tax payable |
962 | 7,007 | ||||||
| Other current liabilities |
10,199 | 5,054 | ||||||
| Other liabilities |
833 | 366 | ||||||
| Retirement obligation |
(171 | ) | 490 | |||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities |
48,131 | 28,366 | ||||||
| Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
| (Increase) decrease in marketable securities |
(64,233 | ) | 712 | |||||
| (Increase) decrease in securities purchased under agreements to resell |
23,550 | (6,240 | ) | |||||
| Capital expenditures |
(4,762 | ) | (9,608 | ) | ||||
| (Increase) decrease in other assets |
1,019 | (3,694 | ) | |||||
| Net cash used in investing activities |
(44,426 | ) | (18,830 | ) | ||||
| Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
| Dividends paid |
(5,000 | ) | (7,500 | ) | ||||
| Net cash used in financing activities |
(5,000 | ) | (7,500 | ) | ||||
| Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
(1,295 | ) | 2,036 | |||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
1,763 | 1,014 | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 468 | $ | 3,050 | ||||
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
6
NYMEX HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| 1. | Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Nature of Business
NYMEX Holdings, Inc. (NYMEX Holdings) was incorporated in 2000 as a stock corporation in Delaware, and is the successor to the New York Mercantile Exchange which was established in 1872. The two principal operating subsidiaries of NYMEX Holdings are the New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. (NYMEX Exchange or NYMEX Division) and the Commodity Exchange, Inc. (COMEX or COMEX Division), which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the NYMEX Division. When discussing NYMEX Holdings together with its subsidiaries, reference is being made to the Company.
The Company demutualized on November 17, 2000, at which time the book value of the assets and liabilities of the New York Mercantile Exchange carried over to the NYMEX Division.
The Company exists principally to provide facilities for buying, selling and clearing of energy and precious and base metals commodities for future delivery under rules intended to protect the interests of market participants. The Company itself generally does not own commodities, trade for its own account, or otherwise engage in market activities. The Company provides the physical facilities necessary to conduct an open outcry auction market, electronic trading systems, systems for the matching and clearing of trades executed on the Exchange, and systems for the clearing of certain bilateral trades executed in the over-the-counter (OTC) market. These services facilitate price discovery, hedging, and liquidity in the energy and metals markets. Transactions executed on the Exchange mitigate the risk of counter-party default because the Companys clearinghouse acts as the counter-party to every trade. Trading on the Exchange is regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
Significant Accounting Policies
The Companys accounting policies are described in the notes of the December 31, 2003 audited consolidated financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K. The accounting policies that management has identified as critical or complex accounting policies are described starting on Page 25 of this Form 10-Q under the caption Critical Accounting Policies.
Basis of Presentation
The unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Reclassifications are made to the unaudited consolidated financial statements to conform to the current presentation, when appropriate.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in Item 15(a) of NYMEX Holdings, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. Quarterly results are not necessarily indicative of results for any subsequent period.
The Company delayed filing of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pending review of its fixed asset inventory balances, which it determined was necessary to ensure that its reported financial statements were materially correct. The Company has completed its review and has identified charges of $4.4 million, of which $2.0 million relates to 2004 and $2.4 million relates to prior year periods. These charges represent (i) write-off of certain fixed assets that had been disposed of during fiscal years 2004 and prior, (ii) adjustments relating to the depreciation of certain other fixed assets and (iii) an adjustment of the net book values of the Companys fixed assets resulting from a physical inventory of certain asset categories. The impact of these adjustments on the Companys prior period financial statements has been determined by management and the Audit Committee of the Company to not be material to the users of such financial statements based on relevant quantitative and qualitative factors. In addition, management and the Audit Committee have
7
NYMEX HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
determined that the impact of recording the $2.4 million adjustment in the current quarter will not be material to the full year financial statements of the Company. Accordingly, these charges were recognized as current period adjustments in the three-month period ended September 30, 2004, with $1.0 million recorded in depreciation and amortization and $3.4 million recorded in asset impairment and disposition losses in the unaudited consolidated statements of income.
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of NYMEX Holdings and its wholly-owned subsidiaries: NYMEX Division; COMEX Division; COMEX Clearing Association, Inc. (CCA); NYMEX Technology Corporation (which became inactive in November 1996); and Tradingear Acquisition LLC. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. COMEX Division and CCA were acquired by the Company in 1994. While CCA is still in existence, its operations were consolidated into the NYMEX Division in May 2003.
Earnings per Share
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 128, Earnings per Share, basic net earnings per common share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average of the Companys common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net earnings per common share reflect the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. The Company does not have common stock equivalents, therefore, diluted earnings per share is equal to basic earnings per share. For the three months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, basic and diluted earnings per share were $6,842 and $1,885, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, basic and diluted earnings per share were $21,013 and $9,154, respectively.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Changes
In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Financial Accounting Interpretation (FIN) No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others (FIN No. 45). This interpretation elaborates on the existing disclosure requirements for most guarantees, including loan guarantees, and standby letters of credit. It also clarifies that at the time a company issues a guarantee, the company must recognize an initial liability for the fair market value of the obligations it assumes under that guarantee and must disclose that information in its interim and annual financial statements. The initial recognition and measurement provisions of the interpretation apply on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The Company adopted FIN No. 45, effective January 1, 2003. The adoption of FIN No. 45 did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
In December 2003, the FASB issued FIN No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN No. 46R). FIN No. 46R requires a company to consolidate a variable interest entity if it is designated as the primary beneficiary of that entity even if the company does not have a majority of voting interests. A variable interest entity is generally defined as an entity that has insufficient equity to finance its activities or the owners of the entity lack the risk and rewards of ownership. FIN No. 46R replaces FIN No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, which was issued in January 2003. The interpretation applies to interests in variable interest entities or potential variable interest entities commonly referred to as special-purpose entities for the periods ending after December 15, 2003 and for all other types of entities in the financial statements for periods ending after March 15, 2004. The Company does not have any interests that would change its current reporting entity or require additional disclosure as outlined in FIN No. 46R.
8
NYMEX HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| 2. | Collateralization |
In connection with reverse repurchase agreements, the Company receives collateral that is held in custody by the Companys banks. At September 30, 2004, the Company accepted collateral in the form of U.S. Treasury bills that it is permitted by contract or industry practice to sell or re-pledge. At September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the total collateral held was $32.3 million and $97.2 million, respectively.
| 3. | Notes Payable |
The Company issued long-term debt totaling $100 million during 1996 and 1997 to provide completion financing for the Companys trading facility and headquarters. This issuance is comprised of three series, each with different maturity dates, interest rates, and repayment schedules. Series A notes require annual principal repayments from 2001 to 2010, and a final payment of principal in 2011. Series B notes require annual principal repayments from 2011 to 2020, and a final payment of principal in 2021. Series C notes require annual principal repayments from 2022 to 2025, and a final payment of principal in 2026. The notes represent senior unsecured obligations of the Company and are not secured by the facility, the Companys interest therein, or any other collateral. At September 30, 2004, the notes payable balance was $91.5 million.
| 4. | Member Seat Financing Program |
Included in marketable securities are investments that are pledged as collateral with one of the Companys investment managers relating to a membership seat financing program. Under this program, the investment manager extends credit to individuals purchasing NYMEX Division membership seats. The program requires that the Company pledge assets to the investment manager in an amount equal to at least 118% of the loan value. In the event a member defaults on a loan, the investment manager has the right to seize the Companys collateral for the amount of the default, and the Company has the right to liquidate the members interest in the NYMEX Division to be reimbursed for its loss of collateral. At September 30, 2004, there were total seat loan balances of $7.9 million and securities pledged against the seat loan balances of $9.3 million.
| 5. | Incentive Programs |
The Company has various discretionary rebate and cost reduction programs that reduce operating costs of certain market participants. These programs were designed to provide incentives to third parties to establish business with the Company. During the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2004, these programs totaled $4.0 million and $8.9 million, respectively, compared to $1.4 million and $2.9 million, respectively, in the prior year periods.
During 2003, the Company had in effect a proprietary fee reduction program. Under this program, NYMEX Division members received from the Company, either directly or through a clearing member, payments representing reductions of their clearing and transaction fees. The amount of payments under this program was based on each members individual trading and clearing volumes, and represented a stated per-side transaction fee reduction. The level of the per-side fee reduction was set periodically by the Companys board of directors. Clearing and transaction fees were recorded net of these payments, which totaled $3.8 million and $11.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively. This program was eliminated effective December 31, 2003 and, as a result, there were no fee reduction credits during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004.
9
NYMEX HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| 6. | Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Credits |
Clearing and transaction fees receivable are carried net of allowances for member credits, which are based upon expected billing adjustments. Allowances for member credits were $255,000 at September 30, 2004.
An allowance for doubtful accounts was established for market data accounts receivables to cover potential non-collectible receivables as well as future adjustments by the market data customers. At September 30, 2004, this allowance was $130,000, which the Company believes is sufficient to cover potential bad debts and subsequent credits. At September 30, 2004, the combined amounts due from customers with the ten highest receivable balances represented 79% of the total accounts receivable balance.
Other revenues, which include member booth rentals, licensing fees and equipment rentals, are recognized on an accrual basis in the period during which the Company derives economic value, with the exception of floor and compliance fines, which are recognized when cash is received. The Company has established a reserve for non-collectible receivables of $665,000 at September 30, 2004, and believes the amount is sufficient to cover potential bad debts and subsequent credits.
| 7. | Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information |
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 are as follows (in thousands):
| Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||
| 2004 |
2003 | |||||
| Cash paid for: |
||||||
| Interest |
$ | 3,524 | $ | 3,629 | ||
| Income taxes |
$ | 14,677 | $ | 4,794 | ||
| Noncash investing and financing activities: |
||||||
| Purchase of assets under capital lease obligation |
$ | 955 | $ | | ||
| 8. | Margin Deposits and Guaranty Funds |
The Company is required, under the Commodity Exchange Act, to maintain separate accounts for cash and securities that are deposited by clearing members at banks, approved by the Company, as margin for house and customer accounts. These margin deposits are used by members to meet their obligations to the Company for margin requirements on open futures and options positions, as well as delivery obligations.
Each clearing member firm is required to maintain a security deposit, in the form of cash or U.S. treasury securities, ranging from $100,000 to $2.0 million per division, based upon such clearing member firms reported regulatory capital, in a fund known as a Guaranty Fund. Historically, separate and distinct Guaranty Funds were maintained for the NYMEX Division and the COMEX Division. Effective May 16, 2003, the NYMEX Division assumed all of the clearing functions of the COMEX Division. Accordingly, the deposits were aggregated and are now maintained in a single Guaranty Fund which may be used for any loss sustained by the Company as a result of the failure of a clearing member to discharge its obligations on either division. Although there is now one Guaranty Fund for both divisions, separate contribution amounts are calculated for each division.
10
NYMEX HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Every member and non-member executing transactions on the Companys divisions must be guaranteed by a clearing member and clear their transactions through the Companys clearinghouse. This requirement also applies to transactions conducted outside of the Exchange which clear through NYMEX ClearPortSM Clearing. Clearing members of the NYMEX Division and COMEX Division require their customers to maintain deposits in accordance with Company margin requirements. Margin deposits and Guaranty Funds are posted by clearing members with the Companys clearinghouse. In the event of a clearing member default, the Company satisfies the clearing members obligations on the underlying contract by drawing on the defaulting clearing members Guaranty Funds. If those resources are insufficient, the Company may fund the obligations from its own financial resources or draw on Guaranty Funds posted by non-defaulting clearing members. During the second quarter of 2003, the Company obtained a $100 million default insurance policy. This insurance coverage is available to protect the Company and clearing members in the event that a default in excess of $130 million occurs which depletes the available Guaranty Funds and defaulting member margin deposits. Additionally, the Company is evaluating the viability of a line of credit that would provide temporary liquidity, prior to accessing Guaranty Funds, in the event of a clearing member default, and would be collateralized by margin deposits and Guaranty Funds.
The Company is entitled to earn interest on cash balances posted as margin deposits and Guaranty Funds. Such balances are included in the Companys consolidated balance sheets, and are generally invested overnight in securities purchased under agreements to resell.
The following table sets forth margin deposits and Guaranty Fund balances held by the Company on behalf of clearing members at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 (in thousands):
| Cash and securities earning interest for NYMEX Holdings
|
September 30, 2004 |
December 31, 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
| Margin Deposits |
Guaranty Funds |
Total Funds |
Margin Deposits |
Guaranty Funds |
Total Funds | |||||||||||||
| Cash |
$ | 6 | $ | | $ | 6 | $ | 67 | $ | 81 | $ | 148 | ||||||
| Securities held for resale |
29,945 | 2,375 | 32,320 | 92,450 | 4,640 | 97,090 | ||||||||||||
| Total cash and securities |
29,951 | 2,375 | 32,326 | 92,517 | 4,721 | 97,238 | ||||||||||||
| Cash and securities earning interest for members |
||||||||||||||||||
| Money market funds |
1,957,620 | | 1,957,620 | 2,099,620 | | 2,099,620 | ||||||||||||
| U.S. treasuries |
5,749,227 | 142,256 | 5,891,483 | 5,108,929 | 149,911 | 5,258,840 | ||||||||||||
| Letters of credit |
441,514 | | 441,514 | 408,632 | | 408,632 | ||||||||||||
| Total cash and securities |
8,148,361 | 142,256 | 8,290,617 | 7,617,181 | 149,911 | 7,767,092 | ||||||||||||
| Total funds |
$ | 8,178,312 | $ | 144,631 | $ | 8,322,943 | $ | 7,709,698 | $ | 154,632 | $ | 7,864,330 | ||||||
| 9. | Commitments and Contingencies |
Contractual Obligations
The Company occupies premises under leases, including a land lease, with various lessors that expire during the years 2004 through 2069. For the three months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, rental expense for facilities and the land lease amounted to $0.9 million and $0.7 million, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, rental expense for facilities and the land lease amounted to $1.9 million and $3.4 million, respectively.
In connection with its operating activities, the Company enters into certain contractual obligations. The Companys material contractual cash obligations include long-term debt, operating leases, a capital lease and other contracts. A summary of the Companys future cash payments associated with its contractual cash
11
NYMEX HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
obligations outstanding as of September 30, 2004, as well as an estimate of the timing in which these commitments are expected to expire, are set forth on the following table (in thousands):
| Payments Due by Period | |||||||||||||||
| Less than 1 Year |
1 -3 Years |
4 -5 Years |
After 5 Years |
Total | |||||||||||
| Contractual Obligations |
|||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt principal |
$ | 2,817 | $ | 5,634 | $ | 5,634 | $ | 77,464 | $ | 91,549 | |||||
| Debt interest |
6,942 | 13,252 | 12,409 | 50,568 | 83,171 | ||||||||||
| Operating Leases |
4,572 | 8,121 | 7,116 | 10,043 | 29,852 | ||||||||||
| Capital lease |
468 | 487 | | | 955 | ||||||||||
| Other long-term obligations |
800 | 1,600 | 1,600 | 7,451 | 11,451 | ||||||||||
| Total contractual obligations |
$ | 15,599 | $ | 29,094 | $ | 26,759 | $ | 145,526 | $ | 216,978 | |||||
The Companys senior notes are subject to a prepayment penalty in the event they are paid off prior to their scheduled maturities. The Company believes that any economic benefits derived from early redemption of these notes would be offset by the redemption penalty. These notes place certain limitations on the Companys ability to incur additional indebtedness.
Financial Guarantees
The Company adopted FIN No. 45, effective, January 1, 2003. The Company has certain guarantee arrangements in its clearing process as well as other financial guarantees discussed below:
Included in marketable securities are investments that are pledged as collateral with one of the Companys investment managers relating to a membership seat financing program. Under this program, the investment manager extends credit to individuals purchasing NYMEX Division memberships. The program requires that the Company pledge assets to the investment manager in an amount equal to at least 118% of the loan value. In the event a member defaults on a loan, the investment manager has the right to seize the Companys collateral for the amount of the default, and the Company has the right to liquidate the members interest in the NYMEX Division to be reimbursed for its loss of collateral. At September 30, 2004, there were total seat loan balances of $7.9 million and $9.3 million in securities that were pledged against the seat loan balances.
The Company serves a clearinghouse function, standing as a financial intermediary on every futures and options transaction cleared. Through its clearinghouse, the Company maintains a system of guarantees for performance of obligations owed to buyers and sellers. This system of guarantees is supported by several mechanisms, including margin deposits and Guaranty Funds posted by clearing members with the Companys clearinghouse. The Company is required, under the Commodity Exchange Act, to maintain separate accounts for cash and securities that are deposited by clearing members at banks approved by the Company as margin for house and customer accounts. These clearing deposits are used by members to meet their obligations to the Company for margin requirements on open futures and options positions as well as delivery obligations. As of September 30, 2004, there were no clearing members in default.
There were no events of default during the first nine months of 2004, in either arrangement, in which a liability should be recognized in accordance with FIN No. 45.
Legal Proceedings
Set forth below is a description of material litigation to which the Company is a party, as of September 30, 2004. Although there can be no assurance as to the ultimate outcome, the Company believes it has meritorious defenses and is vigorously defending each matter described below. The final outcome of any litigation, however, cannot be predicted with certainty, and an adverse resolution of these matters could have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
12
NYMEX HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Company has been named as a defendant in the following legal action:
New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. v. IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. On November 20, 2002, NYMEX Exchange commenced an action in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. (ICE). The amended complaint alleges claims for (a) copyright infringement by ICE arising out of ICEs uses of certain NYMEX Exchange settlement prices; (b) service mark infringement by reason of use by ICE of the service marks NYMEX and NEW YORK MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, (c) violation of trademark anti-dilution statutes, and (d) interference with contractual relationships. On January 6, 2003, ICE served an Answer and Counterclaims, in which ICE alleges five counterclaims against NYMEX Exchange as follows: (1) a claim for purported violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2, for NYMEX Exchanges allegedly trying to maintain a monopoly in the execution of the North America energy futures and expand the alleged monopoly into the execution and clearing of North American OTC energy contracts by attempting to deny ICE access to NYMEX Exchange settlement prices; (2) a claim for purported violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act by conspiring with certain of its members to restrain trade by attempting to deny ICE access to NYMEX Exchange settlement prices; (3) a claim for alleged violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act by NYMEX Exchange purportedly denying ICE access to NYMEX Exchanges settlement prices which are allegedly an essential facility; (4) a claim for purported violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act and Section 3 of the Clayton Act by NYMEX Exchange allegedly tying execution services for North American energy futures and options to clearing services; and (5) a claim for purported violation of the Lanham Act through false advertising with respect to certain services offered by NYMEX Exchange and services offered by ICE. The counterclaims request damages and trebled damages in amounts not specified yet by ICE in addition to injunctive and declaratory relief.
On August 11, 2003, the Court issued an opinion dismissing certain counterclaims and one affirmative defense, with leave to replead. On or about August 28, 2003, NYMEX Exchange was served with ICEs First Amended Counterclaims in which ICE made four counterclaims against NYMEX Exchange principally alleging violations of U.S. antitrust laws, including claims regarding monopoly leveraging.
By Order and Opinion dated June 30, 2004, the Court granted NYMEX Exchanges motion and dismissed all of the antitrust counterclaims asserted against NYMEX Exchange. This case is ongoing.
The Company is defending counterclaims filed against it by the defendant in the following legal action:
New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. v. Kai Neumann and Codeland, Inc. On May 18, 2004, NYMEX Exchange commenced an action in New York State Supreme Court. This action arises from defendants alleged unauthorized use of computer software and other subject matter proprietary to NYMEX Exchange, and asserts causes of action for, among other things, trade secret misappropriation, fraudulent misrepresentation, and breach of fiduciary duties. On June 25, 2004, defendants Neumann and Codeland answered the complaint and interposed several counterclaims against NYMEX Exchange that include causes of action for breach of contract and theft of trade secrets. These counterclaims seek, among other things, $13,000,000 in compensatory damages, $10,000,000 in punitive damages, as well as injunctive relief and additional damages for back pay, front pay, lost fringe benefits, and reinstatement of Neumanns employment. NYMEX Exchanges time to reply, move or otherwise respond to these counterclaims was extended to October 12, 2004. On that date NYMEX Exchange moved to dismiss certain counterclaims. On December 20, 2004, NYMEX Exchange settled this action. The settlement was recorded in the current period ended September 30, 2004 and did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
13
NYMEX HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| 10. | Segment Reporting |
The Company considers operating results for two business segments: Open Outcry and Electronic Trading and Clearing. Open Outcry is the trading and clearing of NYMEX Division and COMEX Division futures and options contracts on the trading floor of the Exchange. Electronic Trading and Clearing consists of NYMEX ACCESS®, NYMEX ClearPortSM Trading and NYMEX ClearPortSM Clearing. The Company reports income on a segment basis, but does not allocate assets or goodwill. Operating revenues presented for each segment include clearing and transaction fees related to such segment and a pro rated portion of market data fees. Other revenues are attributed entirely to Open Outcry. Depreciation and amortization and other operating expenses are allocated based on the proportion of operating revenues attributed to each segment. The prior year segment information has been restated to reflect this methodology of reporting each segment.
Financial information relating to these segments is set forth below (in thousands):
| Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Open Outcry |
Electronic Trading and Clearing |
Total | ||||||||||||||||
| Three Months |
Nine Months |
Three Months |
Nine Months |
Three Months |
Nine Months | |||||||||||||
| Operating revenues |
$ | 46,281 | $ | 133,740 | $ | 15,672 | $ | 37,909 | $ | 61,953 | $ | 171,649 | ||||||
| Depreciation and amortization |
5,119 | 13,555 | 1,734 | 3,842 | 6,853 | 17,397 | ||||||||||||
| Other operating expenses |
33,706 | 93,796 | 11,413 | 26,587 | 45,119 | 120,383 | ||||||||||||
| Operating income (loss) |
7,456 | 26,389 | 2,525 | 7,480 | 9,981 | 33,869 | ||||||||||||
| Investment income, net |
1,809 | 2,225 | | | 1,809 | 2,225 | ||||||||||||
| Interest expense |
1,770 | 5,310 | | | 1,770 | 5,310 | ||||||||||||
| Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
3,319 | 10,323 | 1,118 | 3,314 | 4,437 | 13,637 | ||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) |
$ | 4,176 | $ | 12,981 | $ | 1,407 | $ | 4,166 | $ | 5,583 | $ | 17,147 | ||||||
| Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Open Outcry |
Electronic Trading and Clearing |
Total | ||||||||||||||||
| Three Months |
Nine Months |
Three Months |
Nine Months |
Three Months |
Nine Months | |||||||||||||
| Operating revenues |
$ | 38,919 | $ | 114,043 | $ | 6,926 | $ | 22,460 | $ | 45,845 | $ | 136,503 | ||||||
| Depreciation and amortization |
4,155 | 11,997 | 740 | 2,363 | 4,895 | 14,360 | ||||||||||||
| Other operating expenses |
31,641 | 88,950 | 5,631 | 17,518 | 37,272 | 106,468 | ||||||||||||
| Operating income |
3,123 | 13,096 | 555 | 2,579 | 3,678 | 15,675 | ||||||||||||
| Investment income, net |
643 | 3,393 | | | 643 | 3,393 | ||||||||||||
| Interest expense |
1,823 | 5,468 | | | 1,823 | 5,468 | ||||||||||||
| Provision for income taxes |
747 | 4,970 | 213 | 1,160 | 960 | 6,130 | ||||||||||||
| Net income |
$ | 1,196 | $ | 6,051 | $ | 342 | $ | 1,419 | $ | 1,538 | $ | 7,470 | ||||||
| 11. | Members Retirement Plan and Benefits |
The Company maintains a retirement and benefit plan for certain members of the COMEX Division under the COMEX Members Recognition and Retention Program (MRRP). The annual benefit payments are $12,500 ($2,000 for options members) for 10 years for vested participants; no new participants were permitted after the date of the merger, nor were there payments made prior to January 1, 2002. The Company is required to fund the plan with a minimum annual contribution of $400,000 until the plan is fully funded. Based on continued funding of $800,000 per year, and certain actuarial assumptions, the Company expects the plan to be fully funded in 2018. Corporate contributions and related investment earnings are charged
14
NYMEX HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
against current operations. All benefits to be paid under the COMEX MRRP shall be based upon reasonable actuarial assumptions which, in turn, are based upon the amounts that are available and are expected to be available to pay benefits, except that the benefits paid to any individual will not exceed the amounts stated above. Quarterly distributions from the program began in the second quarter of 2002. Subject to the foregoing, the board of directors of the Company reserves the right to amend or terminate the COMEX MRRP upon an affirmative vote of 60% of the eligible COMEX Division plan participants.
| 12. | Postretirement Benefits other than Pensions |
The Companys postretirement benefit costs are developed from actuarial valuations. Inherent in these valuations are key assumptions, including the discount rate and expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. Material changes in its postretirement benefit costs may occur in the future due to changes in these assumptions, changes in the number of plan participants, changes in the level of benefits provided, and changes in asset levels. The Company provides certain health care and life insurance benefit plans for qualifying retired employees. Substantially all of the Companys employees may become eligible for these benefits if they reach specified age and years of service criteria while working for the Company. The benefits are provided through certain insurance companies. The Company expects to fund its share of such benefit costs principally on a pay-as-you-go basis. In December 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the Act) became law in the U.S. The Act introduces a prescription drug benefit under Medicare as well as a federal subsidy to sponsors of retiree health care benefit plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to the Medicare benefit. In accordance with FAS No. 106-1, Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003, the Company elected to defer recognition of the effects of the Act in any measures of the benefit obligation or cost. In May 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 106-2 (FAS No. 106-2) under the same title. FAS No. 106-2 provides guidance on accounting for the benefits attributable to new government subsidies for companies that provide prescription drug benefits to retirees. The Company has concluded that it will likely not be eligible to receive a subsidy. Therefore, the Act is not expected to have a material effect on the Companys consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows. The measurement date used to determine pension and other postretirement benefit measures for the pension plan and the postretirement benefit plan is December 31 of each year.
Accrued postretirement benefit costs are included in other non-current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. The accrued postretirement obligations recorded in the balance sheet at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 exceed the amount of the accumulated obligations.
The following table presents the funded status of such plans, reconciled with amounts recognized in the Companys consolidated financial statements (in thousands):
| For the Three Months Ended September 30, |
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
| 2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||
| Service costs |
$ | 123 | $ | 55 | $ | 253 | $ | 165 | ||||||||
| Interest costs |
119 | 62 | 245 | 185 | ||||||||||||
| Expected return on plan assets |
| | | | ||||||||||||
| Amortization of prior service costs |
(15 | ) | (14 | ) | (43 | ) | (43 | ) | ||||||||
| Amortization of net (gain) loss |
7 | (5 | ) | 5 | (17 | ) | ||||||||||
| Net periodic postretirement benefit cost |
234 | 98 | 460 | 290 | ||||||||||||
| Adjustment for prior period overstatement |
| (276 | ) | | (827 | ) | ||||||||||
| Total net period postretirement benefit cost |
$ | 234 | $ | (178 | ) | $ | 460 | $ | (537 | ) | ||||||
15
NYMEX HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| 13. | Subsequent Events |
On October 5, 2004, the Company introduced the New York Mercantile Exchange Electronic Order Network (NEON) in its gold and silver futures rings, with Prudential Financial Derivatives, LLC, serving as the first futures commission merchant to offer the service. NEON is a technology that was internally developed by the Exchange to provide a gateway for firms and traders to route orders to the Exchanges energy and metals markets. The network conforms with industry standard financial information exchange message formats and provides firms with a webbased display for order data including status and fill details.
On October 6, 2004, the board of directors of the Company voted to move daytime trading of its financially-settled PJM monthly electricity futures contract from the trading floor to its internet-based NYMEX ClearPortsm Trading system, effective November 1, 2004.
On November 1, 2004, the Company launched open outcry trading of Brent Crude Oil futures in its newly established Dublin, Ireland branch (NYMEX-Europe). Open outcry is the primary means of trading at NYMEX-Europe, with trading also being made available on an after-hours basis via the Companys electronic trading systems. The Company has sub-leased space from FINEX, the Board of Trade of the City of New York, Inc.s Dublin operation. The board of directors of the Company approved the launch of a trading floor in Dublin on October 18, 2004.
On November 12, 2004, the Company and the Taiwan Futures Exchange announced that they have signed a memorandum of understanding to develop areas of cooperation and business opportunities with the goal of enhancing the liquidity, efficiency, and integrity of the markets of both exchanges.
On December 15, 2004, the board of directors of the Company voted to declare and distribute a dividend of $3.5 million to stockholders of record as of December 31, 2004. The dividend is the fifth issued by the Company since its demutualization in November 2000.
16
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
Throughout this document NYMEX Holdings, Inc. will be referred to as NYMEX Holdings and, together with its subsidiaries, as the Company. The two principal operating subsidiaries of NYMEX Holdings are New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. (NYMEX Exchange or NYMEX Division), and Commodity Exchange, Inc. (COMEX or COMEX Division), which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of NYMEX Exchange. Where appropriate, each division will be discussed separately, and collectively will be discussed as the Exchange.
Since its founding 132 years ago, the Company has evolved into a major provider of financial services to the energy and metals industries. A core component of the business is the revenue derived from the Companys trading facilities and from providing clearing and settlement services through its clearinghouse to a wide range of participants in these industries. A significant amount of revenue is also derived from the sale of market data. Based upon the Companys volume of approximately 139 million contracts transacted and/or cleared on the Exchange during 2003, the Exchange is the largest physical commodity based futures exchange in the world and the third largest futures exchange in the U.S.
The NYMEX Exchange is the largest exchange in the world for the trading of energy futures and options contracts, including contracts for crude oil, unleaded gasoline, heating oil and natural gas, and is the largest exchange in North America for the trading of platinum group metals contracts.
The COMEX is the largest marketplace for gold and silver futures and options contracts, and is the largest exchange in North America for futures and options contracts for copper and aluminum. Participants in the Exchanges markets include a wide variety of customers involved in the production, consumption and trading of energy and metals products. Market participants use the Exchange for both hedging and speculative purposes.
NYMEX ClearPortSM Clearing is the mechanism by which individually negotiated off-exchange trades are submitted to the Exchange for clearing of specified products. The NYMEX ClearPortSM Clearing system enables market participants to take advantage of the financial depth and security of the NYMEX Exchange clearinghouse along with access to more than 60 energy futures contracts.
Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
The Company may, in discussions of its future plans, objectives and expected performance in periodic reports filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (or documents incorporated by reference therein) and in written and oral presentations made by the Company, include projections or other forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the 1934 Act). Such projections and forward-looking statements are based on assumptions, which the Company believes are reasonable but are, by their nature, inherently uncertain. Some of the important factors that could cause actual results to differ from any such projections or other forward-looking statements are discussed below, and in other reports filed by the Company under the 1934 Act, including in the Companys December 31, 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Companys forward-looking statements are based on information available to the Company today, and except as required by law, the Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Actual results and experience may differ materially from forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including: changes in general economic and industry conditions in various markets in which the Companys contracts are traded; increased competitive activity; fluctuations in trading floor administrative expenses related to trading and clearing contracts; the ability to control costs and expenses; changes to legislation or regulations; protection and validity of the Companys intellectual property rights and rights licensed from others; and other unanticipated events and conditions. It is not possible for the Company to foresee or identify all such factors.
17
Market Conditions
For the three months ended September 30, 2004, the volume of total futures and options contracts traded and cleared was 43.7 million contracts, an increase of 8.7 million contracts or 24.9% from 35.0 million contracts for the same period last year.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, the volume of total futures and options contracts traded and cleared was 123.7 million contracts, an increase of 16.3 million contracts or 15.2% from 107.4 million contracts for the same period last year.
Provided below is a discussion of the Companys three significant components of trading and clearing operations: (i) the NYMEX Division; (ii) the COMEX Division; and (iii) NYMEX ClearPortSM Clearing. The NYMEX Division and COMEX Division information presented in the following discussion excludes contracts cleared through NYMEX ClearPortSM Clearing.
Trading and clearing volumes discussed in this managements discussion and analysis are expressed as round-turns, which are matched buys and sells of the underlying contracts. These volumes include futures settlement and options exercise transactions for which transaction fees are assessed. Prior to the filing of the second quarter 2004 Form 10-Q, the Company did not include settlement and exercise volumes in its volume disclosures. Accordingly, prior period volume information has been adjusted to include such transactions for comparative purposes. Open interest represents the number of contracts at September 30, 2004 and 2003 for which clearing members and their customers are obligated to the Companys clearinghouse and are required to make or take future delivery of the physical commodity (or in certain cases be settled by cash), or close out the position with an offsetting sale or purchase prior to contract expiration. Options open interest represents unexpired, unexercised option contracts.
Energy Markets NYMEX Division
For the three months ended September 30, 2004, the volume of futures and options contracts traded and cleared on the NYMEX Division was 32.9 million contracts, an increase of 6.5 million contracts or 24.6% from 26.4 million contracts for the same period last year. Futures contracts volume was 26.6 million contracts, an increase of 4.8 million contracts or 22.0% from 21.8 million contracts for the same period last year. Options contracts volume was 6.3 million contracts, an increase of 1.7 million contracts or 37.0% from 4.6 million contracts for the same period last year.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, the volume of futures and options contracts traded and cleared on the NYMEX Division was 92.2 million contracts, an increase of 8.0 million contracts or 9.5% from 84.2 million contracts for the same period last year. Futures contracts volume was 75.3 million contracts, an increase of 7.6 million contracts or 11.2% from 67.7 million contracts for the same period last year. Options contracts volume was 16.9 million contracts, an increase of 0.4 million contracts or 2.4% from 16.5 million contracts for the same period last year.
The following tables set forth trading and clearing volumes and open interest for the Companys major energy futures and options products.
18
NYMEX Division Contracts Traded and Cleared
(in thousands)
| For the Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2004 |
2003 | |||||||||||
| Quarterly Comparison |
Futures |
Options |
Total |
Futures |
Options |
Total | ||||||
| Light sweet crude oil |
14,054 | 3,346 | 17,400 | 11,059 | 2,160 | 13,219 | ||||||
| Henry Hub natural gas |
5,259 | 2,274 | 7,533 | 4,536 | 2,072 | 6,608 | ||||||
| N.Y. heating oil |
3,108 | 253 | 3,361 | 2,884 | 157 | 3,041 | ||||||
| N.Y. harbor unleaded gasoline |
3,289 | 205 | 3,494 | 2,982 | 163 | 3,145 | ||||||
| Other |
923 | 170 | 1,093 | 290 | 53 | 343 | ||||||
| Total |
26,633 | 6,248 | 32,881 | 21,751 | 4,605 | 26,356 | ||||||
|
NYMEX Division Contracts Traded and Cleared (in thousands)
| ||||||||||||
| For the Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2004 |
2003 | |||||||||||
| Year-to-Date Comparison |
Futures |
Options |
Total |
Futures |
Options |
Total | ||||||
| Light sweet crude oil |
40,277 | 8,859 | 49,136 | 34,571 | 8,357 | 42,928 | ||||||
| Henry Hub natural gas |
13,873 | 6,179 | 20,052 | 14,884 | 6,781 | 21,665 | ||||||
| N.Y. heating oil |
9,529 | 501 | 10,030 | 8,791 | 537 | 9,328 | ||||||
| N.Y. harbor unleaded gasoline |
10,037 | 820 | 10,857 | 8,860 | 599 | 9,459 | ||||||
| Other |
1,587 | 492 | 2,079 | 629 | 194 | 823 | ||||||
| Total |
75,303 | 16,851 | 92,154 | 67,735 | 16,468 | 84,203 | ||||||
|
NYMEX Division Contracts Open Interest (in thousands)
| ||||||||||||
| At September 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2004 |
2003 | |||||||||||
| Futures |
Options |
Total |
Futures |
Options |
Total | |||||||
| Light sweet crude oil |
703 | 1,410 | 2,113 | 501 | 674 | 1,175 | ||||||
| Henry Hub natural gas |
376 | 927 | 1,303 | 350 | 784 | 1,134 | ||||||
| N.Y. heating oil |
190 | 119 | 309 | 158 | 71 | 229 | ||||||
| N.Y. harbor unleaded gasoline |
154 | 50 | 204 | 75 | 21 | 96 | ||||||
| Other |
55 | 52 | 107 | 24 | 11 | 35 | ||||||
| Total |
1,478 | 2,558 | 4,036 | 1,108 | 1,561 | 2,669 | ||||||
Light Sweet Crude Oil
For the three months ended September 30, 2004, futures contract volume was 14.1 million contracts, an increase of 3.0 million contracts or 27.0% from 11.1 million contracts for the same period last year. Options contract volume was 3.3 million contracts, an increase of 1.1 million contracts or 50.0% from 2.2 million contracts for the same period last year. Total futures and options contract volume was 17.4 million contracts, an increase of 4.1 million contracts or 30.8% from 13.3 million contracts for the same period last year.
19
For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, futures contract volume was 40.3 million contracts, an increase of 5.7 million contracts or 16.5% from 34.6 million contracts for the same period last year. Options contract volume was 8.9 million contracts, an increase of 0.5 million contracts or 6.0% from 8.4 million contracts for the same period last year. Total futures and options contract volume was 49.2 million contracts, an increase of 6.2 million contracts or 14.4% from 43.0 million contracts for the same period last year.
The Company believes that increases in futures and options contract volume for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 were due, in part, to the continuing strong global demand for crude oil. In addition, the price volatility of crude oil increased due to terrorism concerns in the Middle East and the hurricanes that have affected the oil refineries located near the Gulf of Mexico. Finally, continued high price differentials between crude oil and gasoline have resulted in higher trading activity.
Henry Hub Natural Gas
For the three months ended September 30, 2004, futures contract volume was 5.3 million contracts, an increase of 0.8 million contracts or 17.8% from 4.5 million contracts for the same period last year. Options contract volume was 2.3 million contracts, an increase of 0.2 million contracts or 9.5% from 2.1 million contracts for the same period last year. Total futures and options contracts volume was 7.6 million contracts, an increase of 1.0 million contracts or 15.2% from 6.6 million contracts for the same period last year.
The Company believes that increases in futures and options contract volume for the three months ended September 30, 2004 were due, in part, to concerns about the natural gas supply resulting from the hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico. The hurricanes caused damage and disruption to the production facilities located in that area, which resulted in reduced natural gas production.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, futures contract volume was 13.9 million contracts, a decrease of 1.0 million contracts or 6.7% from 14.9 million contracts for the same period last year. Options contract volume was 6.2 million contracts, a decrease of 0.6 million contracts or 8.8% from 6.8 million contracts for the same period last year. Total futures and options contracts volume was 20.1 million contracts, a decrease of 1.6 million contracts or 7.4% from 21.7 million contracts for the same period last year.
The Company believes that decreases in futures and options contract volume for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 were due, in part, to diminished concern, prior to the hurricane season, regarding the supply of natural gas. This past winter was characterized by weather that was, for the most part, forecasted accurately. This resulted in weather that was expected, and as a result, there was an adequate supply of natural gas to meet the heating needs of consumers. During the prior year period, a colder than expected winter led to increased concerns about the supply, and therefore, resulted in increased trading activity.
New York Heating Oil
For the three months ended September 30, 2004, futures contract volume was 3.1 million contracts, an increase of 0.2 million contracts or 6.9% from 2.9 million contracts for the same period last year. Options contract volume was 0.3 million contracts, an increase of 0.1 million contracts or 50.0% from 0.2 million contracts for the same prior last year. Total futures and options contracts volume was 3.4 million contracts, an increase of 0.3 million contracts or 9.7% from 3.1 million contracts for the same period last year.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, futures contract volume was 9.5 million contracts, an increase of 0.7 million contracts or 8.0% from 8.8 million contracts for the same period last year. Options contract volume was 0.5 million contracts for both the current and prior year period. Total futures and options contracts volume was 10.0 million contracts, an increase of 0.7 million contracts or 7.5% from 9.3 million contracts for the same period last year.
The Company believes that increases in futures contract volume for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, and options contract volume for the three months ended September 30, 2004, were due, in part, to the continuing strong global
20
demand for petroleum products, including heating oil. In addition, the price volatility in the heating oil market increased, as supply concerns arose due to terrorism in the Middle East and the hurricanes that have affected the oil refineries located near the Gulf of Mexico. Options contract volume for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was essentially flat compared to the same period last year due to unusually strong levels of volume in the prior year period, as volatility was higher due to the war in Iraq.
New York Harbor Unleaded Gasoline
For the three months ended September 30, 2004, futures contract volume was 3.3 million contracts, an increase of 0.3 million contracts or 10.0% from 3.0 million contracts for the same period last year. Options contract volume was 0.2 million for both the current and prior year period. Total futures and options contracts volume was 3.5 million contracts, an increase of 0.3 million contracts or 9.4% from 3.2 million contracts for the same period last year.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, futures contract volume was 10.0 million contracts, an increase of 1.1 million contracts or 12.4% from 8.9 million contracts for the same period last year. Options contract volume was 0.8 million, an increase of 0.2 million contracts or 33.3% from 0.6 million contracts for the same period last year. Total futures and options contract volume was 10.8 million contracts, an increase of 1.3 million contracts or 13.7% from 9.5 million contracts for the same period last year.
The Company believes that increases in futures and options contracts volume for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 were due, in part, to the continuing strong consumer demand for gasoline. The increased demand was coupled with a decrease in gasoline supply as hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico caused refineries to shut down at times throughout the current quarter. These factors attributed to the increased price differential between gasoline and crude oil, resulting in higher trading activity.
Metals Market COMEX Division
For the three months ended September 30, 2004, the volume of total futures and options contracts traded and cleared for the COMEX Division was 6.8 million contracts, a decrease of 0.2 million contracts or 2.9% from 7.0 million contracts for the same period last year. Futures contract volume was 5.3 million contracts for both the current and prior year period. Options contract volume was 1.5 million contracts, a decrease of 0.2 million contracts or 11.8% from 1.7 million contracts for the same period last year.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, the volume of total futures and options contracts traded and cleared for the COMEX Division was 22.7 million contracts, an increase of 4.0 million contracts or 21.4% from 18.7 million contracts for the same period last year. Futures contract volume was 18.6 million contracts, an increase of 3.6 million contracts or 24.0% from 15.0 million contracts for the same period last year. Options contract volume was 4.1 million contracts, an increase of 0.4 million contracts or 10.8% from 3.7 million contracts for the same period last year.
The following tables set forth trading and clearing volumes and open interest for the Companys major metals futures and options products.
21
COMEX Division Contracts Traded and Cleared
(in thousands)
| For the Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2004 |
2003 | |||||||||||
| Quarterly Comparison |
Futures |
Options |
Total |
Futures |
Options |
Total | ||||||
| Gold |
3,442 | 1,253 | 4,695 | 3,198 | 1,550 | 4,748 | ||||||
| Silver |
1,072 | 223 | 1,295 | 1,221 | 179 | 1,400 | ||||||
| High grade copper |
756 | 34 | 790 | 812 | 9 | 821 | ||||||
| Aluminum |
14 | | 14 | 43 | 1 | 44 | ||||||
| Total |
5,284 | 1,510 | 6,794 | 5,274 | 1,739 | 7,013 | ||||||
|
COMEX Division Contracts Traded and Cleared (in thousands)
| ||||||||||||
| For the Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2004 |
2003 | |||||||||||
| Year-to-Date Comparison |
Futures |
Options |
Total |
Futures |
Options |
Total | ||||||
| Gold |
11,878 | 3,246 | 15,124 | 9,331 | 3,273 | 12,604 | ||||||
| Silver |
4,018 | 703 | 4,721 | 3,124 | 398 | 3,522 | ||||||
| High grade copper |
2,624 | 163 | 2,787 | 2,440 | 25 | 2,465 | ||||||
| Aluminum |
71 | | 71 | 129 | 3 | 132 | ||||||
| Total |
18,591 | 4,112 | 22,703 | 15,024 | 3,699 | 18,723 | ||||||
|
COMEX Division Contracts Open Interest (in thousands)
| ||||||||||||
| At September 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2004 |
2003 | |||||||||||
| Futures |
Options |
Total |
Futures |
Options |
Total | |||||||
| Gold |
290 | 630 | 920 | 278 | 706 | 984 | ||||||
| Silver |
93 | 91 | 184 | 106 | 83 | 189 | ||||||
| High grade copper |
97 | 18 | 115 | 91 | 3 | 94 | ||||||
| Aluminum |
10 | | 10 | 8 | | 8 | ||||||
| Total |
490 | 739 | 1,229 | 483 | 792 | 1,275 | ||||||
Gold
For the three months ended September 30, 2004, futures contract volume was 3.4 million contracts, an increase of 0.2 million contracts or 6.3% from 3.2 million contracts for the same period last year. Options contract volume was 1.3 million contracts, a decrease of 0.3 million contracts or 18.8% from 1.6 million contracts for the same period last year. Total futures and options contract volume was 4.7 million contracts, a decrease of 0.1 million contracts or 2.1% from 4.8 million contracts for the same period last year.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, futures contract volume was 11.9 million contracts, an increase of 2.6 million contracts or 28.0% from 9.3 million contracts for the same period last year. Options
22
contract volume was 3.2 million contracts, essentially flat compared to the same period last year. Total futures and options contract volume was 15.1 million contracts, an increase of 2.5 million contracts or 19.8% from 12.6 million contracts for the same period last year.
The Company believes that increases in futures contract volume for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 were due, in part, to significant uncertainty regarding geopolitical conditions, rapidly rising physical commodity prices, a weakened U.S. currency and economic growth, which led to increased hedging and speculative demand for gold futures. The Company believes that the decrease in options contract volume for the three months ended September 30, 2004 was due, in part, to a period of reduced market volatility.
Silver
For the three months ended September 30, 2004, futures contract volume was 1.1 million contracts, a decrease of 0.1 million contracts or 8.3% from 1.2 million contracts for the same period last year. Options contract volume was 0.2 million contracts for both the current and prior year period. Total futures and options contract volume was 1.3 million contracts, a decrease of 0.1 million contracts or 7.1% from 1.4 million contracts for the same period last year.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, futures contract volume was 4.0 million contracts, an increase of 0.9 million contracts or 29.0% from 3.1 million contracts for the same period last year. Options contract volume was 0.7 million contracts, an increase of 0.3 million contracts or 75.0% from 0.4 million contracts for the same period last year. Total futures and options contract volume was 4.7 million contracts, an increase of 1.2 million contracts or 34.3% from 3.5 million contracts for the same period last year.
The Company believes that the decrease in futures contract volume for the three months ended September 30, 2004 was due, in part, to a significant decline in film sales. Silver, a key ingredient in the photographic developing process, is not needed in digital cameras, whose sales have been outpacing those of traditional film cameras.
The Company believes that increases in futures and options contract volume for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 were due, in part, to significant uncertainty regarding geopolitical conditions, rapidly rising physical commodity prices, a weakened U.S. currency and economic growth, which led to increased hedging and speculative demand for silver futures and options.
High Grade Copper
For the three months ended September 30, 2004, futures contract volume was 0.8 million contracts, essentially flat with the same period last year. Options contract volume increased to 34,000 contracts from 9,000 contracts for the same period last year. Total futures and options contract volume was 0.8 million for both the current and prior year period.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, futures contract volume was 2.6 million contracts, an increase of 0.2 million contracts or 8.3% from 2.4 million contracts for the same period last year. Options contract volume increased to 163,000 contracts from 25,000 contracts for the same period last year. Total futures and options contract volume was 2.8 million contracts, an increase of 0.3 million or 12.0% from 2.5 million contracts for the same period last year.
The Company believes that increases in futures and options contract volume for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 were due, in part, to a projected copper deficit in 2004 as a result of declining global warehouse stocks. World usage of copper has exceeded production due to strong housing starts in the U.S. coupled with increased international demand, which contributed to increased market volatility, resulting in increases in copper futures and options trading levels.
23
NYMEX ClearPort SM Clearing
For the three months ended September 30, 2004, futures and options contract clearing volume was 4.0 million contracts, an increase of 2.4 million contracts or 150.0% from 1.6 million contracts from the same period last year.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, futures and options contract clearing volume was 8.8 million contracts, an increase of 4.3 million contracts or 95.6% from 4.5 million contracts from the same period last year.
While the Companys open outcry and electronic trading venues experienced declines in natural gas futures and options trading volumes for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, there was significant growth in natural gas clearing volume through NYMEX ClearPortSM Clearing. The growth in NYMEX ClearPortSM Clearing was due, in part, to traditional over-the-counter market participants seeking credit risk mitigation provided by the Companys clearinghouse for off-exchange trade execution activities. In addition, significant growth in existing natural gas products during the current period and the launch of new products for petroleum, electricity and coal on NYMEX ClearPortSM Clearing contributed to this increase.
NYMEX ClearPortSM Clearing Contracts
(in thousands)
| For the Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||
| Quarterly Comparison |
2004 |
2003 | ||
| Natural gas |
3,719 | 1,506 | ||
| Electricity |
146 | 66 | ||
| Petroleum products |
114 | 34 | ||
| Coal |
2 | 1 | ||
| Total |
3,981 | 1,607 | ||
NYMEX ClearPortSM Clearing Contracts
(in thousands)
| For the Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||
| Year-to-Date Comparison |
2004 |
2003 | ||
| Natural gas |
8,055 | 4,302 | ||
| Electricity |
385 | 147 | ||
| Petroleum products |
372 | 38 | ||
| Coal |
6 | 2 | ||
| Total |
8,818 | 4,489 | ||
24
NYMEX ClearPortSM Clearing Open Interest
(in thousands)
| At September 30, | ||||
| 2004 |
2003 | |||
| Natural gas |
2,183 | 893 | ||
| Electricity |
72 | 31 | ||
| Petroleum products |
109 | 13 | ||
| Coal |
1 | 1 | ||
| Total |
2,365 | 938 | ||
Critical Accounting Policies
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has requested that all registrants discuss their three to five most critical accounting policies in Managements Discussion and Analysis. The SEC indicated that a critical accounting policy is one which is both important to the portrayal of the companys financial condition and results of operations and requires managements most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company believes that the following accounting policies fit this definition:
Internally Developed Software
Statement of Position (SOP) 98-1, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use, provides guidance on the accounting treatment of costs related to software obtained or developed for internal use. The Company has capitalized certain costs to develop internal-use software, consisting primarily of software tools and systems. Since most of its capital expenditures are not exclusively used on developing internally used software, the Company allocates these costs on a project-by-project basis. The Company capitalizes these costs related to software developed for internal use based on the results of this allocation. During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, the Company had no capitalized internal-use software costs, compared to $1.7 million capitalized in the comparable prior year period. These amounts are included in property and equipment, net, in the Companys unaudited consolidated balance sheets. The Company amortizes these capitalized costs to expense over an estimate of the useful life of the internal-use software, which is generally three to five years.
Revenue Recognition
Clearing and Transaction Fee Revenues
The largest source of the Companys operating revenues is clearing and transaction fees. These fees are recognized as revenue in the same period that trades are executed and/or cleared on the Exchange. During 2003, the Company had in effect a proprietary fee reduction program. Under this program, NYMEX Division members received from the Company, either directly or through a clearing member, payments representing reductions of their clearing and transaction fees. The amount of payments under this program was based on each members individual trading and clearing volumes, and represented a stated per-side transaction fee reduction. The level of the per-side fee reduction was set periodically by the Companys board of directors. Clearing and transaction fees were recorded net of these payments, which totaled $3.8 million and $11.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003. This program was eliminated effective December 31, 2003 and, as a result, there were no fee reduction credits during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004.
25
Clearing and transaction fees receivable are monies due to the Company from clearing member firms. Exposure to losses on receivables is principally dependent on the financial condition of each clearing member firm. Clearing members seats collateralize fees owed to the Company. At September 30, 2004, no clearing and transaction fees receivable balance was greater than the related clearing members aggregate seat value. Management does not believe that a concentration of credit risk exists from these receivables. The Company has the right to liquidate a members seat in order to satisfy its receivable.
Clearing and transaction fees receivable are carried net of allowances for member credits, which are based upon expected billing adjustments. Allowances for member credits were $255,000 at September 30, 2004. The Company believes the likelihood of incurring material losses due to non-collectibility of clearing and transaction fees is remote and that the allowance is adequate to cover anticipated member credits.
Market Data Revenue
The Company provides real time information to subscribers regarding prices of futures and options contracts traded on the Exchange. As is common practice in the industry, fees are remitted to the Company by market data customers on behalf of subscribers. Revenues are accrued for the current month based on the most recent month reported by the customers. The Company conducts periodic audits of the information provided. Revenues derived from audit recoveries are recognized when cash is received from the market data customers. An allowance for doubtful accounts was established to cover potential non-collectible customer receivables as well as future adjustments by the market data customers. At September 30, 2004, this allowance was $130,000, which the Company believes is sufficient to cover potential bad debts and subsequent credits. At September 30, 2004, the combined amounts due from customers with the ten highest receivable balances represented 79% of the total accounts receivable balance. Effective January 1, 2005, the Company will implement a new price structure that it anticipates will generate an increase in market data revenue compared to the current structure.
Other Revenues
Other revenues consist of rental income from tenants leasing space in the Companys headquarters building, compliance fines assessed for violation of trading rules and procedures, fees charged to members and non-members for the use of trading booths provided by the Company, fees charged for access to the NYMEX ACCESS® electronic trading system and other miscellaneous revenues. Included in other revenues in the prior year periods are fees charged to members and non-members for the use of telephone equipment and long distance telephone service, whereas in the current year, these fees were recorded as a reduction of telecommunication expenses. Other revenues are recognized on an accrual basis in the period during which the Company derives economic value, with the exception of floor and compliance fines, which are recognized when cash is received. The Company has established a reserve for non-collectible receivables of $665,000 at September 30, 2004, and believes the amount is sufficient to cover potential bad debts and subsequent credits.
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS No. 144). If facts and circumstances indicate that the Companys long-lived assets might be impaired, the estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with the long-lived asset would be compared to its carrying value to determine if a write-down to fair value is necessary. If a write-down is required, the amount is determined by comparing fair market values to carrying values in accordance with SFAS No. 144.
The Company is pursuing a new technology strategy, which is designed to standardize the Companys technology infrastructure. In conjunction with this strategy, the functionality and useful lives of existing technology assets were evaluated as of September 30, 2003. As a result of this evaluation, the Company shortened the estimated useful lives of significant components of its existing technology infrastructure, resulting in an acceleration of depreciation and associated increase in depreciation expense for subsequent periods.
26
Deferred Credits
In 1995, the Company secured a grant of $128.7 million from the New York City Economic Development Corporation (EDC) and the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC, formerly known as the New York State Urban Development Corporation) for construction of its corporate headquarters and trading facility. The grant is being recognized in income on the same basis as, and is a reduction to, the depreciation of the facility.
In 2002, the Company entered into an agreement and received a $5 million grant from the ESDC. This agreement requires the Company to maintain certain annual employment levels, and the grant is subject to recapture amounts on a declining scale over time. The grant is recognized in income ratably in accordance with the recapture schedule.
Results of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003
Overview
Net income for the three months ended September 30, 2004 was $5.6 million, an increase of $4.1 million from $1.5 million for the same period last year. This increase was the result of revenues increasing by $16.2 million, which was partially offset by operating expenses increasing by $9.8 million. The increase in revenues was due to an increase in gross clearing and transaction fees from higher trading and clearing volumes, as well as the elimination of the Companys proprietary fee reduction program that was in effect during 2003. The increase in operating expenses was due primarily to increases in professional fees, depreciation and asset impairment and disposal charges.
Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was $17.1 million, an increase of $9.6 million from $7.5 million for the same period last year. This increase was the result of revenues increasing by $35.1 million, which was partially offset by operating expenses increasing by $17.0 million. The increase in revenues was due to an increase in gross clearing and transaction fees from higher trading and clearing volumes, as well as the elimination of the Companys proprietary fee reduction program that was in effect during 2003. The increase in operating expenses was due primarily to increases in salaries and employee benefits, professional fees, general and administrative expenses, depreciation and asset impairment and disposal charges.
27
The following table summarizes the components of net income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 (in thousands, except for share data):
| Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||
| 2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 | |||||||||
| Total revenues |
$ | 61,953 | $ | 45,845 | $ | 171,649 | $ | 136,503 | ||||
| Operating expenses |
51,972 | 42,167 | 137,780 | 120,828 | ||||||||
| Operating income |
9,981 | 3,678 | 33,869 | 15,675 | ||||||||
| Investment income, net |
1,809 | 643 | 2,225 | 3,393 | ||||||||
| Interest expense |
1,770 | 1,823 | 5,310 | 5,468 | ||||||||
| Income before provision for income taxes |
10,020 | 2,498 | 30,784 | 13,600 | ||||||||
| Provision for income taxes |
4,437 | 960 | 13,637 | 6,130 | ||||||||
| Net income |
$ | 5,583 | $ | 1,538 | $ | 17,147 | $ | 7,470 | ||||
| Basic and diluted earnings per share |
$ | 6,842 | $ | 1,885 | $ | 21,013 | $ | 9,154 | ||||
Revenue
Clearing and Transaction Fees, Net
For the three months ended September 30, 2004, clearing and transaction fees were $50.2 million, an increase of $16.9 million or 50.8% from $33.3 million for the same period last year. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, clearing and transaction fees were $138.8 million, an increase of $36.7 million or 35.9% from $102.1 million for the same period last year. The increases for both the three- and nine-month periods were due to higher NYMEX Division floor trading volumes, NYMEX ClearPortSM Clearing volumes, NYMEX ACCESS® volumes for both the NYMEX Division and COMEX Division and the aggregate average revenue per contract. COMEX Division floor trading volumes increased for the nine-month period. In addition, the elimination of the proprietary fee reduction program, which was in effect during 2003, also contributed to the increase in revenue.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, gross revenue per contract was $1.15 and $1.12, respectively, increases of $0.09 and $0.06 per contract, respectively, compared to the comparable prior year periods. Gross revenue per contract increased due to the customer trading mix and an increase in the trading of certain products on NYMEX ClearPortSM Clearing. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, net revenue per contract increased an additional $0.11 due to the elimination of the proprietary fee reduction program that was in effect during 2003. The following table provides details related to clearing and transaction revenue per contract (in thousands, except for revenue per contract):
| Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||
| 2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||
| Clearing and Transaction Fee Revenue |
||||||||||||||
| Gross fees |
$ | 50,151 | $ | 37,138 | $ | 138,766 | $ | 114,039 | ||||||
| Proprietary fee reduction program |
| (3,801 | ) | | (11,946 | ) | ||||||||
| Clearing and transaction fees, net |
$ | 50,151 | $ | 33,337 | $ | 138,766 | $ | 102,093 | ||||||
| Average Clearing and Transaction Fee Revenue per Contract | ||||||||||||||
| Gross revenue per contract |
$ | 1.15 | $ | 1.06 | $ | 1.12 | $ | 1.06 | ||||||
| Impact of fee reduction program |
| (0.11 | ) | | (0.11 | ) | ||||||||
| Revenue per contract, net |
$ | 1.15 | $ | 0.95 | $ | 1.12 | $ | 0.95 | ||||||
28
Market Data Fees
For the three months ended September 30, 2004, market data fee revenues were $8.2 million, an increase of $0.6 million or 7.9% from $7.6 million for the same period last year. This increase was due primarily to the implementation of separate vendor administrative fees for the NYMEX Division and COMEX Division in May of 2004. Prior to this, vendors were being charged only one administrative fee for access to market data of both divisions.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, market data fee revenues were $23.9 million, essentially flat with the same period last year. The increase in revenue from additional NYMEX Division and COMEX Division units during the current year was offset by audit recovery revenue included in the prior year period.
Other Revenues
For the three months ended September 30, 2004, other revenues were $3.6 million, a decrease of $1.3 million or 26.5% from $4.9 million for the same period last year. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, other revenues were $9.0 million, a decrease of $1.5 million or 14.3% from $10.5 million for the same period last year. The decreases for both the three- and nine-month periods were due primarily to lower revenue from compliance fines, as the third quarter of 2003 included a large compliance fine levied on one of the Companys clearing members offset, in part, by additional rental income recorded from the Board of Trade of the City of New York, Inc.
Operating Expenses
Salaries and Employee Benefits
For the three months ended September 30, 2004, salaries and employee benefit expenses were $13.9 million, a decrease of $0.5 million or 3.5% from $14.4 million for the same period last year. This decrease was due primarily to lower employee costs attributable to a decline in the average number of employees as compared to the same period last year.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, salaries and employee benefit expenses were $42.9 million, an increase of $2.0 million or 4.9% from $40.9 million for the same period last year. This increase was due primarily to an increase in severance costs the Company incurred in the second quarter of 2004 with respect to one of its senior executives, as well as lower levels of capitalized compensation related to software development activities. In addition, this increase was partially offset by lower employee costs attributable to a decline in the average number of employees as compared to the same period last year.
Occupancy and Equipment
For the three months ended September 30, 2004, occupancy and equipment expenses were $7.2 million, an increase of $0.1 million or 1.4% from $7.1 million for the same period last year. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, occupancy and equipment expenses were $19.5 million, a decrease of $1.5 million or 7.1% from $21.0 million for the same period last year. The decrease for the nine-month period was due primarily to the additional rent and associated expenses the Company incurred in the prior year period to maintain a temporary disaster recovery site.
Depreciation and Amortization
For the three months ended September 30, 2004, depreciation and amortization expenses were $6.9 million, an increase of $2.0 million or 40.8% from $4.9 million for the same period last year. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, depreciation and amortization expenses were $17.4 million, an increase of $3.0 million or 20.8% from $14.4 million for the same period last year. The increases for both the three- and nine-month
29
periods were due to additional depreciation related to the change in the useful life of certain fixed assets. The Company continued development of a new technology strategy, which has been designed to standardize the Companys technology infrastructure. Implementation of this strategy is expected to reduce technology operating costs while enhancing processing speed and capacity. In conjunction with this strategy, the functionality and useful lives of existing technology assets were evaluated. As a result of this evaluation, the Company shortened the estimated useful lives of a significant component of its existing technology infrastructure. The change in useful lives will result in higher annual depreciation costs in 2004 compared to 2003. In addition, during the three-month period ended September 30, 2004, the Company identified, through an internal review, a material weakness in its internal controls relating to the acquisition, tracking and disposition of fixed assets. The Company is currently in the process of remediating this weakness, and as a result, certain fixed assets were adjusted to properly reflect their estimated remaining useful life. Depreciation expense attributable to the change in estimated remaining useful life of these assets was $1.0 million for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2004.
General and Administrative
For the three months ended September 30, 2004, general and administrative expenses were $8.4 million, an increase of $1.2 million or 16.7% from $7.2 million for the same period last year. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, general and administrative expenses were $21.5 million, an increase of $4.4 million or 25.7% from $17.1 million for the same period last year. The increases for both the three- and nine-month periods were attributable to the Companys implementation of, in the second quarter of 2003, certain programs designed to provide incentives to third parties to establish business with the Company. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in litigation settlements in the current year periods. In addition, insurance expenses during the current nine-month period increased due to premiums on a default insurance policy obtained in the second quarter of 2003 to provide protection to the Companys clearinghouse in the event of a clearing member default that exceeds the Guaranty Fund.
Professional Services
For the three months ended September 30, 2004, professional services expenses were $6.5 million, an increase of $2.0 million or 44.4% from $4.5 million for the same period last year. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, professional service expenses were $19.0 million, an increase of $5.0 million or 35.7% from $14.0 million for the same period last year. The increases for both the three- and nine-month periods were due primarily to higher consulting fees related to compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as financial and technical consulting to support technology and strategic business initiatives. In addition, legal fees during the current nine-month period increased due to on-going involvement in certain litigation.
Telecommunications
For the three months ended September 30, 2004, telecommunications expenses were $1.2 million, a decrease of $0.5 million or 29.4% from $1.7 million for the same period last year. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, telecommunications expenses were $4.2 million, a decrease of $0.2 million or 4.5% from $4.4 million for the same period last year. The decreases for both the three- and nine-month periods were due to lower data communication expenses. Also, during the current three-month period, a direct billing system was implemented for long distance telecommunication services provided to members, whereby the members are now billed directly by the telecommunications vendors. This resulted in a decrease in telephone expenses during the current three-month period.
Marketing
For the three months ended September 30, 2004, marketing expenses were $0.4 million, a decrease of $0.1 million or 20.0% from $0.5 million for the same period last year. This decrease was due primarily to fewer general marketing expenses incurred during the current three-month period.
30
For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, marketing expenses were $1.7 million, a decrease of $0.2 million or 10.5% from $1.9 million for the same period last year. This decrease was due primarily to fewer advertising campaigns offset, in part, by additional corporate logo sponsorships during the current nine-month period.
Other Expenses
For the three months ended September 30, 2004, other expenses were $2.5 million, an increase of $0.7 million or 38.9% from $1.8 million for the same period last year. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, other expenses were $6.3 million, an increase of $0.1 million or 1.6% from $6.2 million for the same period last year. The increase for the three-month period was due primarily to higher earnings from the COMEX Members Recognition and Retention Program (MRRP). The earnings or losses for the COMEX MRRP are included in investment income, with an equal and offsetting charge recorded in other expenses on the consolidated statements of income.
Asset Impairment and Disposition Losses
The loss on impairment and disposition of property and equipment for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2004 was $4.8 million and $5.4 million, respectively. The Company, in the normal course of business, records charges for the impairment and disposal of assets which it determines to be obsolete. In addition, during the three-month period ended September 30, 2004, the Company identified a material weakness in its internal controls relating to the acquisition, tracking and disposition of fixed assets. The Company is currently in the process of remediating this weakness and, as a result, recorded a charge of $3.4 million in the three-month period ended September 30, 2004 consisting of $1.6 million for certain fixed assets that had been disposed of during periods prior to this three-month period and $1.8 million related to a reduction of fixed asset net book values resulting from a physical inventory of certain fixed asset categories. Charges related to assets disposed of in the normal course of business during the three-month period ended September 30, 2004 were $1.4 million.
Investment Income
For the three months ended September 30, 2004, investment income was $1.8 million, an increase of $1.2 million or 200.0% from $0.6 million for the same period last year. This increase was due primarily to higher unrealized gains on fixed income securities in the current three-month period compared to the same period last year which reported unrealized losses.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, investment income was $2.2 million, a decrease of $1.2 million or 35.3% from $3.4 million for the same period last year. This decrease was due primarily to higher unrealized losses on fixed income securities during the first six months of the current year compared to the same period last year which reported unrealized gains during the first six months.
Provision for Income Taxes
The Companys effective tax rate was 44.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, compared to 45.1% for the same period last year. The difference between the effective tax rates was due primarily to the establishment, during the prior year periods, of valuation allowances related to the potential expiration of charitable contribution carry-forwards and disallowed research and development credits.
Financial Condition and Cash Flows
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At September 30, 2004, the Company had $151.1 million in cash and cash equivalents, securities purchased under agreements to resell and marketable securities. Working capital at September 30, 2004 was $130.2 million.
31
Cash Flow; Sources and Uses of Cash
The Companys principal sources of cash are fees collected from clearing members for trading and/or clearing futures and options transactions, fees collected from market data vendors for distribution of the Companys proprietary contract price information, and rent collected from tenants leased space in the Companys headquarters building. Principal uses of cash include operating expenses, income taxes, capital expenditures, debt service, dividends and payments made to members and third parties under certain incentive programs.
The following table is a summary of significant cash flow categories for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 (in thousands):
| For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||
| 2004 |
2003 |
|||||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 48,131 | $ | 28,366 | ||||
| (Increase) decrease in marketable securities |
(64,233 | ) | 712 | |||||
| (Increase) decrease in securities purchased under agreements to resell |
23,550 | (6,240 | ) | |||||
| Capital expenditures |
(4,762 | ) | (9,608 | ) | ||||
| Other net cash flows |
1,019 | (3,694 | ) | |||||
| Change in cash and investments before dividends |
3,705 | 9,536 | ||||||
| Dividends paid to stockholders |
(5,000 | ) | (7,500 | ) | ||||
| Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
$ | (1,295 | ) | $ | 2,036 | |||
Net cash provided by operating activities includes cash inflows related to operating revenues, net of cash outflows from operating expenses, income taxes and payments to members and third parties under certain incentive programs.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $48.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to $28.4 million for the same period last year. Cash flows from operating activities resulted primarily from net income during both periods, which represents the Companys principal source of cash and led the period-over-period increase. In addition, operating cash flows were positively impacted by increases in accrued salaries and related liabilities and other current liabilities, offset by an increase in accounts receivable related to an increase in revenues period-over-period, and income tax payments of $14.7 million during the current year period compared to $4.8 million in the prior year period. The Company did not pay income taxes in the first quarter of 2003 due to the utilization of net operating losses offsetting taxable income.
Net cash used in investing activities was $44.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, an increase of $25.6 million compared to $18.8 million for the same period last year. This increase was due primarily to the investment of higher operating cash flows into marketable securities.
Capital expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 were $4.8 million and $9.6 million, respectively.
Net cash used in financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 was $5.0 million and $7.5 million, respectively. These amounts represent payments of cash dividends to the Companys common stockholders of $6,127 per common share and $9,191 per common share, respectively. The Company reserves the right to pay discretionary future dividends.
32
In the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company and the Board of Trade of the City of New York, Inc. (NYBOT) entered into a ten-year lease agreement, under which NYBOT is leasing office and trading floor space in the Companys headquarters building. Rent commenced for the office and trading floor space on various occupancy dates during 2003. Operating cash flows in 2004 will benefit from full-year rent receipts under this lease agreement.
The Company believes that its cash flows from operations and existing working capital will be sufficient to meet its needs for the foreseeable future, including capital expenditures, debt service and dividends. Subject to certain limitations under existing long-term note agreements, the Company has the ability and may seek to raise capital through the issuance of debt or equity in the private and public capital markets.
Investment Policy
The Company maintains cash and short-term investments in an amount sufficient to meet its working capital requirements. The Companys investment policies are designed to maintain a high degree of liquidity, emphasizing safety of principal and total after tax return. Excess cash on hand is generally invested overnight in securities purchased under agreements to resell. Cash that is not required to meet daily working capital requirements is invested primarily in high-grade tax-exempt municipal bonds, and obligations of the United States government and its agencies. The Company also invests in equity securities. During the third quarter of 2004, the Company increased the amount of cash invested in overnight repurchase agreements and marketable securities. The Company believes this change will increase its overall investment yield while maintaining a reasonable amount of cash on hand to meet daily working capital needs. At September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, cash and investments were as follows (in thousands):
| September 30, 2004 |
December 31, 2003 | |||||
| Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 468 | $ | 1,763 | ||
| Securities purchased under agreements to resell |
21,500 | 45,050 | ||||
| Marketable securities |
129,118 | 64,885 | ||||
| $ | 151,086 | $ | 111,698 | |||
Included in marketable securities at September 30, 2004 are investments totaling $12.0 million relating to the COMEX MRRP. This plan provides benefits to certain COMEX Division members based on long-term membership, and participation is limited to individuals who were COMEX Division members prior to the Companys acquisition of COMEX in 1994. The Company is required to fund the plan with a minimum annual contribution of $400,000 until the plan is fully funded. Based on continued funding of $800,000 per year, and certain actuarial assumptions, the Company expects the plan to be fully funded by 2018.
Included in marketable securities are investments that are pledged as collateral with one of the Companys investment managers relating to a membership seat financing program. Under this program, the investment manager extends credit to individuals purchasing NYMEX Division membership seats. The program requires that the Company pledge assets to the investment manager in an amount equal to at least 118% of the loan value. In the event a member defaults on a loan, the investment manager has the right to seize the Companys collateral for the amount of the default, and the Company has the right to liquidate the members interest in the NYMEX Division to reimburse its loss of collateral. At September 30, 2004, there were total seat loan balances of $7.9 million and $9.3 million in securities that were pledged against the seat loan balances.
Clearinghouse
The Company serves a clearinghouse function, standing as a financial intermediary on every futures and options transaction cleared. Through its clearinghouse, the Company maintains a system of guarantees for performance of obligations owed to buyers and sellers. This system of guarantees is supported by several
33
mechanisms, including margin deposits and Guaranty Funds posted by clearing members with the Companys clearinghouse. The amount of margin deposits on hand will fluctuate over time as a result of, among other things, the extent of open positions held at any one point in time by market participants in NYMEX Division and COMEX Division contracts and the margin rates then in effect for such contracts.
The Company is required, under the Commodity Exchange Act, to maintain separate accounts for cash and securities that are deposited by clearing members at banks approved by the Company, as margin for house and customer accounts. These margin deposits are used by members to meet their obligations to the Company for margin requirements on open futures and options positions as well as delivery obligations.
Each clearing member firm is required to maintain a security deposit, in the form of cash or U.S. treasury securities, ranging from $100,000 to $2.0 million per division, based upon such clearing member firms reported regulatory capital, in a fund known as a Guaranty Fund. Historically, separate and distinct Guaranty Funds were maintained for the NYMEX Division and the COMEX Division. Effective May 16, 2003, the NYMEX Division assumed all of the clearing functions of the COMEX Division. Accordingly, the deposits were aggregated and are now maintained in a single Guaranty Fund which may be used for any loss sustained by the Company as a result of the failure of a clearing member to discharge its obligations on either division. Although there is now one Guaranty Fund for both divisions, separate contribution amounts are calculated for each division.
Every member and non-member executing transactions on the Companys divisions must be guaranteed by a clearing member and clear their transactions through the Companys clearinghouse. This requirement also applies to transactions conducted outside of the Exchange which clear through NYMEX ClearPortSM Clearing. Clearing members of the NYMEX Division and COMEX Division require their customers to maintain deposits in accordance with Company margin requirements. Margin deposits and Guaranty Funds are posted by clearing members with the Companys clearinghouse. In the event of a clearing member default, the Company satisfies the clearing members obligations on the underlying contract by drawing on the defaulting clearing members Guaranty Funds. If those resources are insufficient, the Company may fund the obligations from its own financial resources or draw on Guaranty Funds posted by non-defaulting clearing members. During the second quarter of 2003, the Company obtained a $100 million default insurance policy. This insurance policy provides coverage that protects the Company and clearing members in the event that a default in excess of $130 million occurs which depletes the available Guaranty Funds and defaulting member margin deposits. Additionally, the Company is evaluating the viability of a line of credit that would provide temporary liquidity, prior to accessing Guaranty Funds, in the event of a clearing member default, and would be collateralized by margin deposits and Guaranty Funds.
The Company is entitled to earn interest on cash and investment balances recorded as margin deposits and Guaranty Funds. Such balances are included in the Companys consolidated balance sheet, and are generally invested overnight in securities purchased under agreements to resell. The table in Note 8, Margin Deposits and Guaranty Funds, sets forth Guaranty Fund balances held by the Company on behalf of clearing members at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003.
Future Cash Requirements
In connection with its operating activities, the Company enters into certain contractual obligations. The Companys material contractual cash obligations include long-term debt, operating leases, a capital lease and other contracts.
A summary of the Companys future cash payments associated with its contractual cash obligations outstanding as of September 30, 2004, as well as an estimate of the timing in which these commitments are expected to expire, are set forth in the following table (in thousands):
| Payments Due by Period | |||||||||||||||
| Less than 1 Year |
1 -3 Years |
4 -5 Years |
After 5 Years |
Total | |||||||||||
| Contractual Obligations |
|||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt principal |
$ | 2,817 | $ | 5,634 | $ | 5,634 | $ | 77,464 | $ | 91,549 | |||||
| Debt interest |
6,942 | 13,252 | 12,409 | 50,568 | 83,171 | ||||||||||
| Operating leases |
4,572 | 8,121 | 7,116 | 10,043 | 29,852 | ||||||||||
| Capital lease |
468 | 487 | | | 955 | ||||||||||
| Other long-term obligations |
800 | 1,600 | 1,600 | 7,451 | 11,451 | ||||||||||
| Total contractual obligations |
$ | 15,599 | $ | 29,094 | $ | 26,759 | $ | 145,526 | $ | 216,978 | |||||
34
The Companys senior notes are subject to a prepayment penalty in the event they are paid off prior to their scheduled maturities. The Company believes that any economic benefits derived from early redemption of these notes would be offset by the redemption penalty. These notes place certain limitations on the Companys ability to incur additional indebtedness.
Other Matters
In February 2004, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) issued, in connection with a Company proposal to clear OTC options, an order requiring, among other things, that the Company establish and maintain a permanent retail customer protection mechanism supported by a commitment of not less than $10 million, which must be available at all times to reimburse retail customers trading on the Exchange whose original margin might be lost in the default of another customer of their clearing member. Based on historical patterns, the Company believes that the likelihood of events that would require its performance under this CFTC order is remote. Therefore, the Company has not established and does not expect in the future to establish, a liability related to this commitment.
On August 6, 2003, the Company modified and implemented new rules addressing the posting of funds for lessee floor brokers and billing entities where the member ownership interest is solely comprised of lessees. The purpose of the modifications was to strengthen the overall financial integrity and accountability of the floor brokerage business community, by requiring lessee floor brokers and billing entities comprised entirely of lessees to post funds of $100,000 as prescribed by the Exchange. The deposited funds may be used to satisfy amounts assessed by Exchange arbitration panels or other duly authorized Exchange committees which remain unsatisfied. The Company maintains deposits for these lessees in cash and securities at financial institutions approved by the Company. These deposits, in the amount of $4.7 million, are not included on the Companys consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2004, and interest earned is paid monthly to each respective lessee.
Business Highlights
On July 7, 2004, the board of directors of the Company voted to declare and distribute a dividend of $2.5 million to stockholders of record as of July 15, 2004. The dividend is the fourth issued by the Company since its demutualization in November 2000.
On July 9, 2004, the Company announced that Dr. James E. Newsome accepted the position of president of the Company, effective August 2, 2004. Dr. Newsome had been Chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) since Senate confirmation in December 2001. He served as a Commissioner of the CFTC since August 1998.
On July 13, 2004, the Company and the Tokyo Commodity Exchange (TOCOM) announced that as of July 20, 2004, energy and metals futures contracts will become available for trading in Japan on NYMEX ACCESS®. In May 2004, the Company and TOCOM executed a cooperation agreement through which, among other things, TOCOM would assist the Company in the offering of the Companys products in Japan.
35
On August 4, 2004, the board of directors of the Company determined not to currently pursue a transaction with Parthenon Capital, LLC (Parthenon), a private equity investment firm. In April 2004, the Company announced that it had received an indication of interest from Parthenon to acquire a potential controlling equity interest in the Company. Parthenon and the Company had engaged in due diligence and preliminary discussions as to the structure of a proposed deal.
On August 12, 2004, the Company and the Shanghai Futures Exchange announced that they have signed a memorandum of understanding to explore potential areas of cooperation that could mutually benefit the memberships of both exchanges. Such areas include cooperation in (i) sharing information regarding physical delivery futures contracts, clearing procedures, and risk management, (ii) developing future lines of business, and (iii) exploring the feasibility of each exchange licensing the others products.
Subsequent Events
On October 5, 2004, the Company introduced the New York Mercantile Exchange Electronic Order Network (NEON) in its gold and silver futures rings, with Prudential Financial Derivatives, LLC, serving as the first futures commission merchant to offer the service. NEON is a technology that was internally developed by the Exchange to provide a gateway for firms and traders to route orders to the Exchanges energy and metals markets. The network conforms with industry standard financial information exchange message formats and provides firms with a webbased display for order data including status and fill details.
On October 6, 2004, the board of directors of the Company voted to move daytime trading of its financially-settled PJM monthly electricity futures contract from the trading floor to its internet-based NYMEX ClearPortsm Trading system, effective November 1, 2004.
On November 1, 2004, the Company launched open outcry trading of Brent Crude Oil futures in its newly established Dublin, Ireland branch (NYMEX-Europe). Open outcry is the primary means of trading at NYMEX-Europe, with trading also being made available on an after-hours basis via the Companys electronic trading systems. The Company has sub-leased space from FINEX, the Board of Trade of the City of New York, Inc.s Dublin operation. The board of directors of the Company approved the launch of a trading floor in Dublin on October 18, 2004.
On November 12, 2004, the Company and the Taiwan Futures Exchange announced that they have signed a memorandum of understanding to develop areas of cooperation and business opportunities with the goal of enhancing the liquidity, efficiency, and integrity of the markets of both exchanges.
On December 15, 2004, the board of directors of the Company voted to declare and distribute a dividend of $3.5 million to stockholders of record as of December 31, 2004. The dividend is the fifth issued by the Company since its demutualization in November 2000.
Responsibility for Financial Reporting
The Companys management is responsible for the preparation, integrity and objectivity of the unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes, and the other financial information contained in this Form 10-Q. Such financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and are considered by management to present fairly the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. These unaudited consolidated financial statements include certain amounts that are based on managements estimates and judgments, giving due consideration to materiality.
36
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The table below provides information about the Companys municipal bond portfolio and long-term debt including expected principal and interest cash flows for the years 2004 through 2009 and thereafter (in thousands):
Principal Amounts by Expected Maturity
At September 30, 2004
| Year |
Principal |
Interest |
Total |
Weighted Average Interest Rate |
||||||||
| Assets |
||||||||||||
| Municipal Bonds | ||||||||||||
| 2004 |
$ | | $ | | $ | | N/A | |||||
| 2005 |
54 | 2 | 56 | 3.47 | % | |||||||
| 2006 |
1,134 | 57 | 1,191 | 4.95 | % | |||||||
| 2007 |
3,489 | 183 | 3,672 | 4.86 | % | |||||||
| 2008 |
10,062 | 395 | 10,457 | 3.88 | % | |||||||
| 2009 and thereafter |
38,046 | 1,678 | 39,724 | 4.19 | % | |||||||
| Total |
$ | 52,785 | $ | 2,315 | $ | 55,100 | ||||||
| Fair Value |
$ | 52,986 | ||||||||||
| Liabilities |
||||||||||||
| Corporate Debt |
||||||||||||
| 2004 |
$ | 2,817 | $ | 3,524 | $ | 6,341 | 7.70 | % | ||||
| 2005 |
2,817 | 6,837 | 9,654 | 7.71 | % | |||||||
| 2006 |
2,817 | 6,626 | 9,443 | 7.71 | % | |||||||
| 2007 |
2,817 | 6,416 | 9,233 | 7.72 | % | |||||||
| 2008 |
2,817 | 6,204 | 9,021 | 7.73 | % | |||||||
| 2009 and thereafter |
77,464 | 53,564 | 131,028 | 7.74 | % | |||||||
| Total |
$ | 91,549 | $ | 83,171 | $ | 174,720 | ||||||
| Fair Value |
$ | 116,012 | ||||||||||
Interest Rate Risk
Current Assets
The Company maintains cash and short-term investments in an amount sufficient to meet its working capital requirements. Excess cash on hand is generally invested overnight in securities purchased under agreements to resell. Cash that is not required to meet daily working capital requirements is invested primarily in high-grade tax-exempt municipal bonds, and obligations of the United States government and its agencies. The Company also invests in equity securities. The Companys investment income consists primarily of interest income and realized and unrealized gains and losses on the market values of its investments. Given the composition of its investment portfolio, the Companys investment income is highly sensitive to fluctuation in interest rates. Investment income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 was $1.8 million and $2.2 million, respectively, compared to income of $0.6 million and $3.4 million for the same periods last year. The fair value of the Companys marketable securities, including equity securities, was $129.1 million at September 30, 2004. Based on portfolio compositions at September 30, 2004, assuming a 10% change in market values, the Company would have recognized losses of $12.9 million.
37
Debt
The weighted average interest rate on the Companys long-term debt is 7.74%. The debt contains a redemption premium, the amount of which varies with changes in interest rates. Therefore, the fair market value of the Companys long-term debt is highly sensitive to changes in interest rates. Although the market value of the debt will fluctuate with interest rates, the Companys interest expense will not vary with changes in market interest rates if the debt is paid off in accordance with stated principal repayment schedules. As of the date of this report, the Company does not expect to pay down any series of its long-term debt prior to stated maturities. However, the Company may pursue future financing strategies that involve early repayment of its current debt, or issuance of new debt, potentially increasing its sensitivity to changes in interest rates.
Credit Risk
NYMEX Division bylaws authorize its board of directors to fix the annual dues of NYMEX Division members and to levy assessments as it determines to be necessary. Such dues and assessments are payable at such time as the Companys board of directors may determine. The Companys board of directors may waive the payment of dues by all NYMEX Division members or by individual members as it determines. The COMEX Division bylaws authorize the Companys board of directors with similar powers relating to dues, assessments and fees with respect to COMEX Division members, provided that such dues and assessments (or fee surcharges in lieu thereof) may not be imposed (other than in connection with certain merger-related events) without the consent of the COMEX Governors Committee and that the ability of the Companys board of directors to impose such fee is subject to the limitations.
The Exchange, as a self-regulatory organization, has instituted detailed risk-management policies and procedures to guard against default risk with respect to contracts traded and/or cleared on the Exchange. The Exchange also has extensive surveillance and compliance operations and procedures to monitor and to enforce compliance with rules pertaining to the trading, position sizes and financial condition of members. As described herein, the Exchange has powers and procedures designed to support contract obligations in the event that a contract default occurs on the Exchange, including authority to levy assessments on any of its clearing members if, after a default by another clearing member, there are insufficient funds available to cover a deficit. The maximum assessment on each clearing member is the lesser of $30 million or 40% of such clearing members reported regulatory capital.
Despite the Companys authority to levy assessments or impose fees, there can be no assurance that the relevant members will have the financial resources available to pay, or will choose to be expelled from membership rather than pay, any dues, fees or assessments. The Company believes that assessment liabilities of a member arising prior to expulsion are contractual in nature and, accordingly, survive expulsion. In addition, the Exchange would have recourse to such member and the proceeds from the Companys sale of such members seat would apply towards any outstanding obligations to the Exchange of such member. Recourse to a members seat, however, may not be of material value in the case of large defaults that result in assessments greater than the seat value, particularly when the seat value declines markedly in price as a consequence of the default.
Moreover, despite the risk mitigation techniques adopted and other powers and procedures implemented by the Company, which are designed to, among other things, minimize the potential risks associated with the occurrence of contract defaults on the Company, there can be no assurance that these powers and procedures will prevent contract defaults or will otherwise function to preserve the liquidity of the Company.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
| (a) | Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Companys principal executive officer and principal financial officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act |
38
| of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, have concluded that, based on such evaluation, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were, except for those relating to the material weakness described in Item 4(b) below, effective in reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act, and this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. |
| (b) | Changes in Internal Controls. There were no changes, other than as discussed below, in the Companys internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation of such internal control that occurred during the Companys last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Companys internal control over financial reporting. |
The Company has identified a material weakness in its internal controls relating to the acquisition, tracking and disposition of fixed assets. The identification of this material weakness caused the Company to delay the filing of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q until the completion of a review of its fixed asset inventory balances. The Company has completed its review and has identified charges of $4.4 million, of which $2.0 million relates to 2004 and $2.4 million relates to prior year periods. These charges represent (i) write-off of certain fixed assets that had been disposed of during fiscal years 2004 and prior, (ii) adjustments relating to the depreciation of certain other fixed assets and (iii) an adjustment of the net book values of the Companys fixed assets resulting from a physical inventory of certain asset categories. The impact of these adjustments on the Companys prior period financial statements has been determined by management and the Audit Committee of the Company to not be material to the users of such financial statements based on relevant quantitative and qualitative factors. In addition, management and the Audit Committee have determined that the impact of recording the $2.4 million adjustment in the current quarter will not be material to the full year financial statements of the Company. Accordingly, these charges were recognized as current period adjustments in the three-month period ended September 30, 2004, with $1.0 million recorded in depreciation and amortization and $3.4 million recorded in asset impairment and disposition losses in the unaudited consolidated statements of income.
The Company is in the process of remediating this weakness in internal controls. Specifically, the Company is in the process of instituting new automated processes to replace certain manual processes, new asset-tagging procedures, and new controls over the disposition of assets. In addition, the Company has instituted a monthly review process that verifies the valuation, categorization and the estimated useful life of all fixed asset additions.
Set forth below is a description of material litigation to which the Company is a party, as of September 30, 2004. Although there can be no assurance as to the ultimate outcome, the Company believes it has meritorious defenses and is vigorously defending each matter described below. The final outcome of any litigation, however, cannot be predicted with certainty, and an adverse resolution of these matters could have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
The Company has been named as a defendant in the following legal action:
New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. v. Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. On November 20, 2002, NYMEX Exchange commenced an action in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). The amended complaint alleges claims for (a) copyright infringement by ICE arising out of ICEs uses of certain NYMEX Exchange settlement prices; (b) service mark infringement by reason of use by ICE of the service marks NYMEX and NEW YORK MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, (c) violation of trademark anti-dilution statutes, and (d) interference with
39
contractual relationships. On January 6, 2003, ICE served an Answer and Counterclaims, in which ICE alleges five counterclaims against NYMEX Exchange as follows: (1) a claim for purported violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2, for NYMEX Exchanges allegedly trying to maintain a monopoly in the execution of the North America energy futures and expand the alleged monopoly into the execution and clearing of North American OTC energy contracts by attempting to deny ICE access to NYMEX Exchange settlement prices; (2) a claim for purported violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act by conspiring with certain of its members to restrain trade by attempting to deny ICE access to NYMEX Exchange settlement prices; (3) a claim for alleged violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act by NYMEX Exchange purportedly denying ICE access to NYMEX Exchanges settlement prices which are allegedly an essential facility; (4) a claim for purported violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act and Section 3 of the Clayton Act by NYMEX Exchange allegedly tying execution services for North American energy futures and options to clearing services; and (5) a claim for purported violation of the Lanham Act through false advertising with respect to certain services offered by NYMEX Exchange and services offered by ICE. The counterclaims request damages and trebled damages in amounts not specified yet by ICE in addition to injunctive and declaratory relief. NYMEX Exchanges response to the counterclaims was served on February 26, 2003.
On August 11, 2003, the Court issued an opinion dismissing certain counterclaims and one affirmative defense, with leave to replead. On or about August 28, 2003, NYMEX Exchange was served with ICEs First Amended Counterclaims in which ICE made four counterclaims against NYMEX Exchange principally alleging violations of U.S. antitrust laws, including claims regarding monopoly leveraging.
By Order and Opinion dated June 30, 2004, the Court granted NYMEX Exchanges motion and dismissed all of the antitrust counterclaims asserted against NYMEX Exchange. This case is ongoing.
The Company is defending counterclaims filed against it by the defendant in the following legal action:
New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. v. Kai Neumann and Codeland, Inc. On May 18, 2004, NYMEX Exchange commenced an action in New York State Supreme Court. This action arises from defendants alleged unauthorized use of computer software and other subject matter proprietary to NYMEX Exchange, and asserts causes of action for, among other things, trade secret misappropriation, fraudulent misrepresentation, and breach of fiduciary duties. On June 25, 2004, defendants Neumann and Codeland answered the complaint and interposed several counterclaims against NYMEX Exchange that include causes of action for breach of contract and theft of trade secrets. These counterclaims seek, among other things, $13,000,000 in compensatory damages, $10,000,000 in punitive damages, as well as injunctive relief and additional damages for back pay, front pay, lost fringe benefits, and reinstatement of Neumanns employment. NYMEX Exchanges time to reply, move or otherwise respond to these counterclaims was extended to October 12, 2004. On that date NYMEX Exchange moved to dismiss certain counterclaims. On December 20, 2004, NYMEX Exchange settled this action. The settlement was recorded in the current period ended September 30, 2004 and did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
Not applicable
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Not applicable
Not applicable
40
| 10.1 | Employment Agreement by and between NYMEX Holdings, Inc., New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. and James E. Newsome, dated as of August 2, 2004. |
| 31.1 | Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to § 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| 31.2 | Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to § 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| 32 | Certification of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
41
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| NYMEX HOLDINGS, INC. | ||||
| Dated: December 28, 2004 | By: | /s/ Mitchell Steinhause | ||
| Name: | Mitchell Steinhause | |||
| Title: | Chairman | |||
| (Principal Executive Officer) | ||||
| Dated: December 28, 2004 |
By: | /s/ Lewis A. Raibley, III | ||
| Name: | Lewis A. Raibley, III | |||
| Title: | Chief Financial Officer | |||
| (Principal Financial Officer) | ||||
42
EXHIBIT 10.1
EXECUTION COPY
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT dated as of August 2, 2004, by and between NYMEX HOLDINGS, INC. (NYMEX Holdings) and NEW YORK MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, INC., (NYMEX and together with NYMEX Holdings, the Company), and JAMES E. NEWSOME (the Executive).
WHEREAS, the Company wishes to retain the services of the Executive in the capacity of President upon the terms and conditions set forth and Executive wishes to accept such employment;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained therein, the parties mutually agree as follows:
1. Term. The Company hereby employs the Executive, and the Executive hereby accepts such employment, for a term commencing as of August 2, 2004 and ending on August 1, 2007, unless sooner terminated in accordance with the provisions of Section 4 or Section 5 (the Term); the Term may be extended or renewed only by the mutual written agreement of the parties.
2. Duties. During the Term, the Executive shall be employed by the Company as President of the Company, and, as such, the Executive shall faithfully perform for the Company the duties of said office and shall perform such other duties of an executive, managerial or administrative nature, consistent with his office, as shall be specified and designated from time to time by the Board of Directors of the Company (the Board). The Executive shall devote substantially all of his business time and effort to the performance of his duties hereunder.
3. Compensation.
3.1 Salary. The Company shall pay the Executive during the Term a salary at the annual rate of: $700,000 (Year 1: 8/2/04 8/1/05); $700,000 (Year 2: 8/2/05 8/1/06); and $900,000 (Year 3: 8/2/06 8/1/07). The Annual Salary shall be payable in accordance with the customary payroll practices of the Company applicable to its senior executives.
3.2 Sign-on Bonus. Within five (5) days of Executives commencement of employment with Company, Company shall pay to the Executive, in a single lump sum, a sign-on bonus of four hundred thousand dollars ($400,000) less applicable deductions and withholdings (Sign-on Bonus).
3.3 Annual Bonus.
In addition to the Annual Salary, Executive will be eligible to be considered for a bonus payment in relation to each year, including any partial year of employment. The Company shall in its absolute discretion in accordance with its established procedures for senior executives, determine whether any such bonus payment will be made to any employees and if to some employees, whether to Executive, and the amount thereof (if any). Payment of a bonus amount in relation to one or more years will under no circumstances give rise to any entitlement to a bonus payment in relation to any other year.
3.4 Benefits.
(a) The Executive shall be permitted during the Term to participate in any group life, hospitalization or disability insurance plans, health programs, retirement plans, fringe benefit programs and similar benefits that may be available to other senior executives of the Company generally, on the same terms as such other executives, in each case to the extent that the Executive is eligible under the terms of such plans or programs.
(b) The Executive shall be entitled to twenty (20) vacation days per annum, prorated for partial years, and two (2) personal days per year.
(c) The Company shall pay (or reimburse) Executive for reasonable moving expenses to assist Executive in relocating to the New York area, including, but not limited to, travel costs associated with seeking permanent housing, actual packing and moving costs, and the cost of temporary housing.
3.5 Grant of Option/Equity.
(a) In the future, the Company may seek to pursue an initial public offering or private placement of equity securities. The Executive acknowledges that an initial public offering or private placement might not be completed, and the Company has not promised that either will in fact occur on any particular terms or to any extent whatsoever. The Company reserves, without limitation, the right to change its plans in this regard at any time and will incur no liability to the Executive if it does so.
(b) If and when the Company completes an initial public offering or private placement of its equity securities, effective not later than the closing of the initial public offering or private placement, the Executive shall be granted an option or other equity or equity-based interest (the Option/Equity), subject to such terms and conditions (including without limitation provisions relating to method of exercise and payment, vesting, withholding, limited periods after termination of employment within which the Option/Equity may be exercised, non-transferability and rights of repurchase and first refusal) as may be determined by the Board of Directors (or other governing body) of the entity granting the Option/Equity, which shall be comparable to the provisions of options granted to other senior officers and executives of the Company.
3.6 Expenses. The Company shall pay or reimburse the Executive for all ordinary and reasonable out-of-pocket expenses actually incurred (and, in the case of reimbursement, paid) by the Executive during the Term in the performance of the Executives services under this Agreement; provided that the reimbursement requests are in compliance with expense reimbursement policies adopted from time to time by the Board.
4. Termination upon Death or Disability. If the Executive dies during the Term, the Term shall terminate as of the date of death, and the obligations of the Company to or with respect to the Executive shall terminate in their entirety upon such date except as otherwise provided under this Section 4. If the Executive by virtue of ill health or other disability is unable (including with reasonable accommodation) to perform substantially and continuously the duties assigned to him for more than 120 consecutive or non-consecutive days out of any consecutive 12-month period, the Company shall have the right, to the extent permitted by law, to terminate the employment of the Executive upon notice in writing to the Executive. Upon termination of employment due to death or disability, in addition to any insurance benefits that may be payable, (i) the Executive (or the Executives estate or beneficiaries in the case of the death of the Executive) shall be entitled to receive any Annual Salary and other benefits earned and accrued under this Agreement prior to the date of termination (and reimbursement under this Agreement
for expenses incurred prior to the date of termination) and (ii) the Executive shall have no further rights to any other compensation or benefits hereunder on or after the termination of employment, or any other rights hereunder, except as required by applicable law.
5. Certain Terminations of Employment.
5.1 Termination for Cause; Voluntary Termination of Employment by the Executive.
| (a) | For purposes of this Agreement, Cause shall mean the Executives: |
| (i) | violation, involving dishonesty, breach of trust or bad faith, of any statute, regulation or rule in the areas of commodities or securities regulation that results in sanctions against the Executive or the Company; |
| (ii) | any intentional act of fraud, embezzlement, theft or misappropriation of Company funds by Executive, as determined after investigation by the Board, or Executives admission or conviction of a felony or of any crime involving moral turpitude, fraud, embezzlement, theft or misrepresentation; |
| (iii) | failure to devote substantially all of his business time and efforts to the Company and failure to cure such breach within ten business days following the Executives receipt of written notice from the Company specifying such breach; |
| (iv) | material breach of any of the provisions of Section 6.1; or |
| (v) | breach in any material respect of the terms and provisions of this Agreement and failure to cure such breach within ten business days following the Executives receipt of written notice from the Company specifying such breach. |
(b) The Company may terminate the Executives employment hereunder for Cause at any time.
(c) The Executive may terminate his employment, for Good Reason or otherwise, on at least 30 days and not more than 60 days written notice given to the Company. For purposes of this Agreement, Good Reason shall mean, without the Executives consent:
(i) relocation by the Company of the Executives principal place of employment by more than 50 miles from New York City;
(ii) a material breach by the Company of the terms of this Agreement and failure to cure such breach within ten business days following the Companys receipt of written notice from the Executive specifying such breach; or
(iii) there is a demotion or significant diminution in Executives responsibilities under the Agreement and failure to cure such breach within ten business days following the Companys receipt of written notice from the Executive specifying such breach.
(d) If the Company terminates the Executive for Cause, or upon any other termination not covered by Section 4 or Section 5.2 (including termination by the Executive not for Good Reason), (i) the Executive shall be entitled to receive Annual Salary and other benefits (but, in all events,
and without increasing the Executives rights under any other provision hereof, excluding any bonuses not yet paid) earned and accrued under this Agreement prior to the termination of employment (and reimbursement under this Agreement for expenses incurred prior to the termination of employment); and (ii) the Executive shall have no further rights to any other compensation or benefits hereunder on or after the termination of employment, or any other rights hereunder, except as required by applicable law.
(e) If the Executives employment is terminated in Year 1 or Year 2 of the Agreement, Executive shall repay to the Company a portion of the Sign-on Bonus within thirty (30) business days of termination in accordance with the following schedule: (104 weeks minus number of weeks worked) multiplied by $3846. This repayment may also be deducted from any payment by the Company made pursuant to Section 5.2.
5.2 Termination by the Company without Cause; Termination by the Executive for Good Reason.
(a) The Company may terminate the Executives employment at any time for any reason or no reason. If the Company terminates the Executives employment other than for Cause, or if the Executive terminates his employment for Good Reason in accordance with Section 5.1(c), and in either such case the termination is not covered by Section 4 or 5.3:
(i) the Executive shall receive Annual Salary and other benefits earned and accrued under this Agreement prior to the termination of employment (and reimbursement under this Agreement for expenses incurred prior to the termination of employment);
(ii) the Executive shall receive (subject to the Executives execution of a general release in a form and substance satisfactory to the Company): (A) a cash payment equal to nine hundred thousand dollars ($900,000), one-third of which will be payable within five business days after the date of termination of employment and two-thirds of which will be payable in equal bi-weekly installments through the applicable Restricted Period; (B) for a period equal to the shortest of (x) twelve months after termination of employment, (y) the period ending when the Executive commences full-time employment with another employer and then or subsequently receives or is entitled to receive (without regard to any waivers) health insurance benefits or (z) the period ending 90 days after the Executive commences full-time employment with another employer, such continuing coverage under the group health plans as the Executive would have received under this Agreement (and at such costs to the Executive) as would have applied in the absence of such termination; and
(iii) the Executive shall have no further rights to any other compensation or benefits hereunder on or after the termination of employment, or any other rights hereunder, except as required by applicable law.
5.3 Termination Upon Failure to Agree Upon Renewal Terms. If the Company and Executive fail to agree on terms for renewal at the end of the Term (as determined under the time-based provisions of Section 1 without regard to early termination under Section 4 or 5) and Executives employment terminates at the end of the Term (as so determined), and in such case the termination is not covered by Section 4 or the Cause provision of section 5.1:
(i) the Executive shall receive Annual Salary and other benefits earned and accrued under this Agreement prior to the termination of employment (and reimbursement under this Agreement for expenses incurred prior to the termination of employment); and
(ii) the Executive shall receive a cash payment equal to nine hundred thousand dollars ($900,000) (subject to the Executives execution of a standard, general release in a form and substance satisfactory to the Company), one-third of which will be payable within five business days after the date of termination and two-thirds of which will be payable in equal bi-weekly installments through the applicable Restricted Period.
6. Covenants of the Executive.
6.1 Covenant Against Competition; Other Covenants. The Executive acknowledges that (i) the principal business of the Company (which expressly includes for purposes of this Section 6, its successors and assigns, any holding or parent company and the direct and indirect subsidiaries of the Company, its successors and assigns and any such holding or parent company) is the operation of a commodities exchange for the trading and/or clearing of futures and options contracts, risk management or other derivative instruments on commodities in the energy and metals sectors (such business, together with the operation of a commodities exchange for the trading and/or clearing of any other futures or options contracts that may in the future, during the pendency of executives employment, be listed by the Company or any entity that is then an affiliate of the Company, herein being collectively referred to as the Business); (ii) the Company is one of the limited number of entities in both the United States and in the world that have developed such a business; (iii) the Companys Business is, in part, both national and international in scope and an integral part of the Companys Business is the expansion of its products on a global scale and the establishment of essential elements of the Business in numerous portions of the world; (iv) the Executives work for the Company has given and will continue to give him access to certain confidential, proprietary information of the Company; (v) the covenants and agreements of the Executive contained in this Section 6 are essential to the business and goodwill of the Company; and (vi) the Company would not have entered into this Agreement but for the covenants and agreements set forth in this Section 6. Accordingly, the Executive covenants and agrees that:
(a) By and in consideration of the salary and benefits to be provided by the Company hereunder, including the severance arrangements set forth herein, and further in consideration of the Executives exposure to the proprietary information of the Company, the Executive covenants and agrees that, during the applicable Restricted Period (as hereinafter defined), he shall not either in the continental United States or elsewhere, directly or indirectly, (i) engage in any material element of the Business, (ii) render any services to any person, corporation, partnership or other entity (other than the Company or its affiliates) engaged in any material element of the Business, or (iii) become interested in any such person, corporation, partnership or other entity (other than the Company or its affiliates) as a partner, shareholder, principal, agent, employee, consultant or in any other relationship or capacity; provided, however, that, notwithstanding the foregoing, the Executive may invest in securities of any entity, solely for investment purposes and without participating directly in the business thereof, if (A) such securities are traded on any national securities exchange or the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. Automated Quotation System, (B) the Executive is not a controlling person of, or a member of a group which controls, such entity and (C) the Executive does not, directly or indirectly, own 1% or more of any class of securities of such entity. As used in this Agreement, the Restricted Period means the period beginning on the date of this Agreement and ending one year after the date on which Executives employment with the Company is terminated.
(b) From the date hereof and following the termination of the Executives employment with the Company for any reason, the Executive shall keep secret and retain in strictest confidence, and shall not use for his benefit or the benefit of others, except in connection with the business and affairs of the Company and its affiliates, all confidential matters relating to the Companys Business and the business of any of its affiliates and to the Company and any of its affiliates, learned by the Executive heretofore or hereafter directly or indirectly from the Company or any of its affiliates (the
Confidential Company Information), and shall not disclose such Confidential Company Information to anyone outside of the Company except with the Companys express written consent and except for Confidential Company Information which is at the time of receipt or thereafter becomes publicly known through no wrongful act of the Executive or is received from a third party not under an obligation to keep such information confidential and without breach of this Agreement.
(c) From the date hereof and for a period of one year after the termination of the Executives employment with the Company, the Executive shall not, without the Companys prior written consent, directly or indirectly, (i) solicit or encourage to leave the employment or other service of the Company, or any of its affiliates, any employee or independent contractor thereof or (ii) hire (on behalf of the Executive or any other person or entity) any employee or independent contractor who has left the employment or other service of the Company or any of its affiliates within the one-year period which follows the termination of such employees or independent contractors employment or other service with the Company and its affiliates. From the date hereof and for a period of one year after the termination of the Executives employment with the Company, the Executive will not, whether for his own account or for the account of any other person, firm, corporation or other business organization, intentionally interfere with the Companys or any of its affiliates relationship with, or endeavor to entice away from the Company or any of its affiliates, any person who during the Term is or was a customer or client of the Company or any of its affiliates. During the Restricted Period, the Executive shall not publish any statement or make any statement under circumstances reasonably likely to become public that is critical of the Company or any of its affiliates, or in any way adversely affecting or otherwise maligning the Business or reputation of the Company or any of its affiliates.
(d) All memoranda, notes, lists, records, property and any other tangible product and documents (and all copies thereof), whether visually perceptible, machine-readable or otherwise, made, produced or compiled by the Executive or made available to the Executive concerning the business of the Company or its affiliates, (i) shall at all times be the property of the Company (and, as applicable, any affiliates) and shall be delivered to the Company at any time upon its request, and (ii) upon the Executives termination of employment, shall be returned to the Company within five (5) business days of Executives termination.
(e) During the Term, the Executive shall disclose to Company and treat as confidential information all ideas, methodologies, product and technology applications that he develops during the course of his employment with Company that relates directly or indirectly to Companys business. Executive hereby assigns to Company his entire right, title and interest in and to all discoveries and improvements, patentable or otherwise, trade secrets and ideas, writings and copyrightable material, which may be conceived by Executive or developed or acquired by him during his employment with Company, which may pertain directly or indirectly to the business of the Company. Executive shall at any time during or after the Agreement Term, upon Companys request, execute, acknowledge and deliver to Company all instruments and do all other acts which are necessary or desirable to enable Company to file and prosecute applications for, and to acquire, maintain and enforce, all patents, trademarks and copyrights in all countries with respect to intellectual property developed or which was being developed during Executives employment with Company.
6.2 Rights and Remedies upon Breach.
The Executive acknowledges and agrees that any breach by him of any of the provisions of Section 6.1 (the Restrictive Covenants) would result in irreparable injury and harm for which money damages would not provide an adequate remedy. Therefore, if the Executive breaches, or threatens to commit a breach of, any of the provisions of Section 6.1, the Company and its affiliates shall
have the following rights and remedies, each of which rights and remedies shall be independent of the others and severally enforceable, and all of which rights and remedies shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, any other rights and remedies available to the Company and its affiliates under law or in equity (including, without limitation, the recovery of damages):
(i) The right and remedy to have the Restrictive Covenants specifically enforced (without the need to prove damages) by any court having equity jurisdiction, including, without limitation, the right to an entry against the Executive of restraining orders and injunctions (preliminary, mandatory, temporary and permanent) against violations, threatened or actual, and whether or not then continuing, of such covenants; and
(ii) The right and remedy to require the Executive to account for and pay over to the Company and its affiliates all compensation, profits, monies, accruals, increments or other benefits (collectively, Benefits) derived or received by him as the proximate result of any actions constituting a breach of the Restrictive Covenants, and the Executive shall account for and pay over such Benefits to the Company and, if applicable, its affected affiliates.
The Executive agrees that in any action seeking specific performance or other equitable relief, he will not assert or contend that any of the provisions of this Section 6 are facially unreasonable or otherwise facially unenforceable. The existence of any claim or cause of action by the Executive, whether predicated on this Agreement or otherwise, shall not limit the Companys right to enforce the Restrictive Covenants.
7. Other Provisions.
7.1 Severability. The Executive acknowledges and agrees that (i) he has had an opportunity to seek advice of counsel in connection with this Agreement and (ii) the Restrictive Covenants are reasonable in geographical and temporal scope and in all other respects. If it is determined that any of the provisions of this Agreement, including, without limitation, any of the Restrictive Covenants, or any part thereof, is invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions of this Agreement shall not thereby be affected and shall be given full effect, without regard to the invalid portions.
7.2 Duration and Scope of Covenants. If any court or other decision-maker of competent jurisdiction determines that any of the Executives covenants contained in this Agreement, including, without limitation, any of the Restrictive Covenants, or any part thereof, is unenforceable because of the duration or geographical scope of such provision, then, after such determination has become final and unappealable, the duration or scope of such provision, as the case may be, shall be reduced so that such provision becomes enforceable and, in its reduced form, such provision shall then be enforceable and shall be enforced.
7.3 Enforceability; Jurisdiction. The Company and the Executive intend to and hereby confer jurisdiction to enforce the Restrictive Covenants set forth in Section 6 any Federal or State court sitting in the State of New York. The parties hereby agree to waive any right to a trial by jury for any and all disputes hereunder (whether or not relating to the Restricted Covenants).
7.4 Notices. Any notice or other communication required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing and shall be delivered personally, or sent by certified, registered or express mail, postage prepaid. Any such notice shall be deemed given when so delivered personally or, if mailed, five days after the date of deposit in the United States mails as follows:
| (i) | If to the Company, to: |
NYMEX Holdings, Inc.
One North End Avenue
New York, New York 10282
Attention: General Counsel
| (ii) | If to the Executive, to him at: |
Crowell and Moring LLP
1001 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20004-2595
Attention: Kris D. Meade, Esq.
Any such person may by notice given in accordance with this Section 7.4 to the other parties hereto designate another address or person for receipt by such person of notices hereunder.
7.5 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements, written or oral, with respect thereto.
7.6 Waivers and Amendments. This Agreement may be amended, superseded, canceled, renewed or extended, and the terms hereof may be waived, only by a written instrument signed by the parties or, in the case of a waiver, by the party waiving compliance. No delay on the part of any party in exercising any right, power or privilege hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall any waiver on the part of any party of any such right, power or privilege nor any single or partial exercise of any such right, power or privilege, preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other such right, power or privilege.
7.7 GOVERNING LAW. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK WITHOUT REGARD TO PRINCIPLES OF CONFLICTS OF LAW.
7.8 Assignment. This Agreement, and the Executives rights and obligations hereunder, may not be assigned by the Executive; any purported assignment by the Executive in violation hereof shall be null and void. In the event of any sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of the Companys assets or business, whether by merger, consolidation or otherwise, the Company may assign this Agreement and its rights hereunder.
7.9 Withholding. The Company shall be entitled to withhold from any payments or deemed payments any amount of tax withholding it determines to be required by law.
7.10 Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective successors, permitted assigns, heirs, executors and legal representatives.
7.11 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed by the parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be an original but all such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Each counterpart may consist of two copies hereof, each signed by one of the parties hereto.
7.12 Survival. Anything contained in this Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, the provisions of Sections 6, 7.3 and 7.9, and the other provisions of this Section 7 (to the extent necessary to effectuate the survival of Sections 6, 7.3 and 7.9), shall survive termination of this Agreement and any termination of the Executives employment hereunder.
7.13 Existing Agreements. The Executive represents to the Company that he is not subject or a party to any employment or consulting agreement, non-competition covenant or other agreement, covenant or understanding which might prohibit him from executing this Agreement or limit his ability to fulfill his responsibilities hereunder.
7.14 Headings. The headings in this Agreement are for reference only and shall not affect the interpretation of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed their names as of the day and year first above written.
| NYMEX HOLDINGS, INC.
| ||
| By: | /s/ Mitchell Steinhause | |
| Name: | Mitchell Steinhause | |
| Title: | Chairman | |
| NEW YORK MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, INC.
| ||
| By: |
/s/ Mitchell Steinhause | |
| Name: |
Mitchell Steinhause | |
| Title: |
Chairman | |
| EXECUTIVE
|
| /s/ James E. Newsome |
| James E. Newsome |
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
I, Mitchell Steinhause, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NYMEX Holdings, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants first fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
| Dated: December 28, 2004 |
By: |
/s/ Mitchell Steinhause | ||
| Name: |
Mitchell Steinhause | |||
| Title: |
Chairman | |||
| (Principal Executive Officer) |
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
I, Lewis A. Raibley, III, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NYMEX Holdings, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants first fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
| Dated: December 28, 2004 |
By: |
/s/ Lewis A. Raibley, III | ||
| Name: |
Lewis A. Raibley, III | |||
| Title: |
Chief Financial Officer | |||
| (Principal Financial Officer) |
Exhibit 32
Certification of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NYMEX Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Mitchell Steinhause as Principal Executive Officer of the Company, and Lewis A. Raibley, III, as Principal Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
| Dated: December 28, 2004 |
By: |
/s/ Mitchell Steinhause | ||
| Name: |
Mitchell Steinhause | |||
| Title: |
Chairman | |||
| (Principal Executive Officer) |
| Dated: December 28, 2004 |
By: |
/s/ Lewis A. Raibley, III | ||
| Name: |
Lewis A. Raibley, III | |||
| Title: |
Chief Financial Officer | |||
| (Principal Financial Officer) |